| Revision as of 13:22, 21 July 2004 view sourceFT2 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 edits 1) Added a little psychological info on zoophilia, 2) did some research to find out how common it is, and added the results.← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:28, 21 July 2004 view source FT2 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 editsm paragraph break and minor wording change for clarityNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Zoophilia is usually considered to be unnatural, and zoosexuality has been condemned as ]; however, some, such as philosopher ], argue that this is not inherently the case. As with ] and ], the activity is no longer classified as a pathology by ] when taken by itself, and people who practice zoophilia tend to reject the view of their activities as disordered. | Zoophilia is usually considered to be unnatural, and zoosexuality has been condemned as ]; however, some, such as philosopher ], argue that this is not inherently the case. As with ] and ], the activity is no longer classified as a pathology by ] when taken by itself, and people who practice zoophilia tend to reject the view of their activities as disordered. | ||
| The extent to which zoosexuality occurs is controversial. There have been many attempts to assess the frequency of occurance. Allowing for the grey areas and weaknesses in method, a reasonable estimate for the Western world would seem to be that 2-8% of sexually active adults have had a zoophilic experience at some point in their lives which was not "once off", and a larger number (? 10-30% depending on area) will have fantasised or had some form of brief encounter. Larger figures such as 50% for farm teenagers have been cited in some surveys, but the quality of the statistics is uncertain to the present writer. Figures of under 1% for sexually active zoophiles are probably unrealistic. |
The extent to which zoosexuality occurs is controversial. There have been many attempts to assess the frequency of occurance. Allowing for the grey areas and weaknesses in method, a reasonable estimate for the Western world would seem to be that 2-8% of sexually active adults have had a zoophilic experience at some point in their lives which was not "once off", and a larger number (? 10-30% depending on area) will have fantasised or had some form of brief encounter. Larger figures such as 50% for farm teenagers have been cited in some surveys, but the quality of the statistics is uncertain to the present writer. Figures of under 1% for sexually active zoophiles are probably unrealistic. | ||
| Nancy Friday's acclaimed book on ] "My Secret Garden" was published in 1973 (ie, well before the internet). It comprised around 180 womens contributions. Of these, some 10% volunteered a serious interest or active participation in zoophilia. | |||
| Zoophilia advocates claim that the human/animal relationship goes far beyond sexuality, and that they are capable of forming a ] with an animal that can frequently last several years and that they do not consider functionally different from any other love/sex relationship. | Zoophilia advocates claim that the human/animal relationship goes far beyond sexuality, and that they are capable of forming a ] with an animal that can frequently last several years and that they do not consider functionally different from any other love/sex relationship. | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 21 July 2004
 | The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Zoophilia is a paraphilia defined as sexual attraction by a human to non-human animals. Human/animal sexual interaction is referred to as zoosexuality, or simply animal sex; the term bestiality is the actual dictionary term, used especially in legal and negative contexts. The quite ambiguous term sodomy has also sometimes been used for bestiality. In pornography, zoosexuality is occasionally referred to as "farmsex" or "dogsex" .
Zoophilia is usually considered to be unnatural, and zoosexuality has been condemned as animal abuse; however, some, such as philosopher Peter Singer, argue that this is not inherently the case. As with BDSM and homosexuality, the activity is no longer classified as a pathology by DSM-IV when taken by itself, and people who practice zoophilia tend to reject the view of their activities as disordered.
The extent to which zoosexuality occurs is controversial. There have been many attempts to assess the frequency of occurance. Allowing for the grey areas and weaknesses in method, a reasonable estimate for the Western world would seem to be that 2-8% of sexually active adults have had a zoophilic experience at some point in their lives which was not "once off", and a larger number (? 10-30% depending on area) will have fantasised or had some form of brief encounter. Larger figures such as 50% for farm teenagers have been cited in some surveys, but the quality of the statistics is uncertain to the present writer. Figures of under 1% for sexually active zoophiles are probably unrealistic.
Nancy Friday's acclaimed book on Female Sexuality "My Secret Garden" was published in 1973 (ie, well before the internet). It comprised around 180 womens contributions. Of these, some 10% volunteered a serious interest or active participation in zoophilia.
Zoophilia advocates claim that the human/animal relationship goes far beyond sexuality, and that they are capable of forming a loving relationship with an animal that can frequently last several years and that they do not consider functionally different from any other love/sex relationship.
Zoophilia and the law
Zoophilia is illegal in many jurisdictions, while others generally outlaw the mistreatment of animals without specifically mentioning zoosexuality.
Just over half of U.S. states explicitly outlaw zoophilia (sometimes under the name sodomy). In Australia laws are also determined state by state, with only the Australian Capital Territory and Jervis Bay Territory not explicitly outlawing it. In Germany, sex with animals is not specifically outlawed (but pornography showing it is); in West Germany, the law making it a crime was removed in 1969, while in East Germany (until the German reunification), there never was a law against zoophilia at all. In Britain, section 69 of the 'Sexual Offences Act 2003' reduced the sentence to a maximum of 2 years imprisonment.
An anomaly that arose in many U.S states was that when laws outlawing sodomy were repealed, some people thought sex with animals would no longer outlawed, but a recent conviction of a man in Florida proved that even in states with no specific laws against bestiality- animal cruelty statutes can and will be used (see State v/s Mitchel link below)
Six States recently adopted new legislation against bestiality OR, ME, IA, IL, IN and MO.In Maine in 2000, there was a court case in which Frank Buble attacked his son Philip with an iron bar, allegedly because of his son's sexual relationship with the family dog, Lady. Philip Buble regarded the dog to be his wife, and wrote a formal letter (signed "Philip and Lady Buble") to the court requesting that his 'significant other' be allowed to attend the court hearing. This was declined, although Frank Buble faced a prison sentence for assault, while no charges were brought against his son. The Bangor Daily News archives show numerous articles on this case, including one detailing Philip Buble's alleged abuse towards his father and avocating zoophilia to the parents of young children on the internet. Refs: bangordailynews.com
In the Netherlands, in 2004 according to the newspapers, there was some concern by a legislator that a man caught having sex in a neighbor's barn with a horse not belonging to him could not be prosecuted because no law was broken. There was no visible injury to the horse; the man who was arrested was caught by the horse's owner in the act.
Zoophilia as a lifestyle
Separate from those whose interest is curiosity, pornography, or sexual novelty, are those for whom zoophilia might be called a lifestyle. A common reported starting age is at puberty, around 9 - 11, and this seems consistent for both males and females. Those who discover an interest at an older age often trace it back to nascent form during this period or earlier. Lifestyle zoophiles often share some or all of the following common traits:
- Some form of social individualism. This can be either inhibitive (eg, shyness) or empowering (eg, independence of thought). Zoophiles tend not to be people who unquestioningly follow a peer group.
- An emotional respect for animals. Examples of human emotion towards animals in everyday society are common (google: pet memorials); in some cases this will become akin to a partnership, or become sexual.
- Belief that animals and humans are not so different in many ways, similar to the way that homosexuals feel the gender gap is not a major issue.
- A sense that humans can be deceptive and manipulative (even if only white lies), such people respect animals and their company is sought for not having this trait and for not requiring protective social barriers.
- A "romantic" nature, the desire to have a bond for life, and a partner to devote oneself to fully. (Relationships of this quality are hard to depend upon with humans, as human partners often come to demand heavy compromise of the romantic relationship over time)
- Above average awareness of feelings (empathy). This may be cause or effect, it isn't clear which. In other words, they may be close to animals because they empathize well, or have developed empathic skills because of intimate closeness with animals. Either way, zoophiles are often described by those who do not realise their sexuality as being caring individuals aware of others feelings.
- Loneliness, insofar as others of like kind are hard to find.
- An open view on sexuality. Sex is commonly seen as "just part of life". Zoophiles tend also to be highly accepting of bi/homosexuality, but less accepting of abusive activities.
- A higher proportion than average of zoophiles appear to be engaged in supportive work for animal welfare, SPCA, conservation organisations, etc.
- That the ideal life would be an animal as lifelong mate, and a human as a companion (with or without the possibility of sexual relationship).
Lifestyle zoophiles often experience the biggest issues of their chosen life as the inability to be open or accepted in their relationships. This is not usually religion-oriented, as many zoophiles find religion and zoophilia to be compatible. Another difficulty is the loss of loved ones, in a world that dismisses animals as secondary species.
Animals and humans differ in sexuality. For most animals, sex carries less importance, is burdened with fewer social and conceptual barriers, and is more an immediate than a conceptual experience. Therefore there are 3 trends amongst zoophiles, depending whether the human partner feels inclined to human-style relationships (human remains monogamous), animal-style relationships (both partners trusted to make own sexual choices, humans role is primarily as protector), or tries to blend the two in various ways.
Zoophiles may or may not have human partners. In some cases the human partner or family knows. As human partnerships are often seen by society as desirable and there is social pressure to be in them, both male and female zoophiles often marry and this forces many to keep their other lifestyle as a private affair.
Zoophilia in pornography
Pornography involving zoosexuality is widely illegal, even in most countries where the act itself is not explicitly outlawed. In the United States, this pornography is automatically considered obscene and therefore may not be sold, mailed or imported (production and mere possession appear to be legal however). Similar restrictions obtain in Germany (cf. §184 StGB ).
Materials featuring animal sex are widely available on the Internet, however, mainly because their production and sale is legal in countries like the Netherlands and Denmark. Promoting "stars" began with Danish Bodil Joensen, in the period of 1970-72. Into the 1980s the Dutch took the lead, creating figures like Wilma and "Dutch Sisters". Today, in Hungary, where producing zoophilia pornography faces no legal limitations, the "bestiality" materials has turned out to be a real industry that produces numerous films, magazines, particularly for the Dutch companies and the genre created its "very own" stars like Hector (a dog starring in several films). Elsewhere, female porn performers conceive zoophilia shootings as an easy way to make more money (e.g. Chessie Moore) or to be famous. (e.g. Linda Lovelace). Pornography of this sort has become known as the stock in trade of a particular class of spammers. Email spam featuring women having sex with goats and dogs usually casts the activity as a form of sexual degradation.
Zoophilia in mythology
Zoophilia has been a frequent subject in art, literature, and fantasy. In Greek mythology, Zeus appeared to Leda in the form of a swan (resulting in the birth of Helen and Polydeuces), and the Minotaur was the offspring of Queen Pasiphae and a white bull. The god Pan has also been frequently associated with animal sex.
Erotic furry fantasy art and stories have been accused of promoting zoophilia, but defenders point out that the characters are predominantly humanoid fantasy creatures who are thinking, reasoning beings as capable of giving consent as any human. Furry characters have been compared to other non-human characters who are subjects of love/sexuality fantasies, such as the Vulcans and Klingons in Star Trek.
See also
Books
- Midas Dekkers: Dearest Pet: On Bestiality, ISBN 1859843107
- Mark Matthews: The Horseman: Obsessions of a Zoophile, ISBN 0-87975-902-X
- Andrea Beetz: Love, Violence, and Sexuality in Relationships between Humans and Animals, ISBN 3832200207
- Marjorie B. Garber: Dog Love, ISBN 0641042728
- Brenda Love: The Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices, ISBN 1569800111
- Colin J. Williams and Martin S. Weinberg: Zoophilia in Men: a study of sexual interest in animals. - in: Archives of sexual behavior, Vol. 32, No.6, December 2003, pp. 523-535
External links
- Humane Concepts
- Zoophile - information for zoophiles
- Humane Society of the US: HSUS viewpoint
- German animal rights site on zoophilia: German language
- Website (resource): (Surveys on zoophilia in society, includes anecdotal and 3rd party verified research plus subjective information)
- Philip Buble case, see item #9:
- Hani Miletski: Understanding Bestiality and Zoophillia, available at Hani Miletskis Homepage
- PURE: Pure animal page:
- Humane Concepts: Animal Sex-Abuse, available at Humane Concepts Homepage
- State v/s Mitchel: