Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:25, 9 April 2006

User:Jtkiefer/userpage/talk

Incident Report Board

Hi, I` m soory, but I had nothing to do with this; this is the first I even hear of it.Zmmz 03:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Acuman Is Very Underhanded

He instigates these problems then pretends he is innocent. I was never warned by anyone I was told that the beleived I made a personal attack and I verified what I did. Can you please look at the threat Acuman made toward me. How come nothing is done about his racist or untrue comments? Look at the large group of people complaining about his edits that are very misleading and misinforming 69.196.139.250 05:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

250

He's supposed to be blocked per this. As you can see for yourself, he's now moved to grossly vandalizing my talk page! Aucaman 06:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

RE

Could i ask my what's my personal attack? Inanna 23:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Since you're opposed to Curps's block bot

You might be interested in . --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 01:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Boothy arbcom case

original header ==Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443== --- changed so it wouldn't break talk page formatting

A final decision has been made in the above arbitration case, and it has been closed.

For the Arbitration committee. ---Tony Sidaway 16:55, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Loyola vandal

You might want to read this report for more information about this vandal. In general, he is to be indef blocked on sight. Many of the reports in Category:Wikipedia_vandals contain useful information about vandals and are recommended reading. Cheers! --Ryan Delaney 02:03, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Curpsbot

I didn't expect to be unbanned yet, so I emailed you. Would you be willing to certify an RFC "against" Curps relating to his block bot? Alternately, do you think there's any chance of an RFC about block bots in general not being deleted after a day for not being certified? --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 08:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

WP:BRFA

Hi Jtkiefer. I notice you seem to be active on the Bots request for approval page, so I was wondering if you could take a look at my bot request and leave a comment on it. Thanks! Cmdrjameson 23:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:Archive

I modified the template. It now works on all archive pages on wikipedia. It will also work as if I never made an edit as it is backwards compatible. --Cool Cat 00:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Warning Template Subst

• Hey, I noticed that your bot has been substituting a bunch of my vanadlism warnings given to anon users. I was just wondering why you were doing this? I read the policy page but didn't quite understand why it's necessary. Thanks -- pm_shef 21:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Star Wars

Hey there. I noticed you created an incarnation of WPSW a couple months ago. Well, Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Star Wars has been up for a month and a half now, so feel free to join and help out! — Deckiller 22:10, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

re: personal attacks

I phrased my opinion in the most civil manner I saw possible, and also linked to a couple of the edits that led me to that opinion. Had I said "oppose, candidate is a lunatic" (or "batshit"), I agree that it would have constituted a personal attack. — Mar. 26, '06 <freakofnur_xture|talk>

Dropping adminship

I do hope you are serious in your statement on the failed bcrat nomination page that you will also be resigning your adminship. Without animosity, I feel that would be best all around. For one thing, I can show it to JDG and hopefully use it to get him back to the project. For another thing, your history as Jtkiefer will follow you around like a wolf even if you have learned from all these misadventures. Better to chill out and come back later, compile a good record as a contributor, then see where you want to take it... Where will I be able to see you are in fact off the rolls of active admins? Jim Tour 21:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

removal of access

I've fulfilled your request on Meta. Sorry to see you go. Regards — Dan | talk 22:53, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello Jtkiefer,

I'm very sorry if I have overstepped my bounds...I assure you that is not my intention!

Jewell Marceau told me (two days ago) that she was terribly unhappy with the way she had been described on Misplaced Pages. She knew that I am somewhat..okay *a very little bit* familiar with this website and asked me if I could help her make some changes in the page. The image used was supplied by her, with her full permission. It is also used on her page of the "My Space" website.

A huge problem that so many performers in the adult industry face is that people take extreme liberties with our personal information and feel absolutely vallidated in posting hurtful, and even dangerous tidbits on the Internet. I myself have had extreme difficulties with cyberstalking. This is probably why my "POV" seems too slanted in favor of the individual.

I have attempted to "Wikify" the page and remove traces of my personal "POV." I'm hoping I have met your approval? Please feel free to instruct me further...

Sincerely, Darla Crane

KGV Computer Blocking

I am contesting the blocking of all ESF computers as it violates the philosophy of wikipedia as being easily and freely available by all of mankind.

Are you on WikiTree?

I assume that this is not you, since it isn't actually a real user. I wouldn't have a clue whether any of the IPs which have edited that page are significant, but I thought you might like to know. HTH HAND. —Phil | Talk 07:20, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

No it isn't me. Jtkiefer ---- 03:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 13:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Jim

I do feel vindicated. So, I'm back. Maybe I can get somebody to expunge the Block Log, as this guy was pretty clearly out of control. JDG 08:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

You were the one who was refusing to follow Misplaced Pages policy so I have absolutely no sympathy for you and hope that you get blocked again. Jtkiefer ---- 03:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)