Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jtkiefer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:10, 10 April 2006 editJDG (talk | contribs)3,103 edits Response to attack← Previous edit Revision as of 18:44, 10 April 2006 edit undoMoe Epsilon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers119,291 edits response to JDGNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:



== Response to attack == == Response to attack ==
Line 10: Line 9:


::Jeez, it's a good thing you got caught out when you did. No telling what kind of trouble you would have caused as a b'crat. A guy who can't control his 'tonque' has no business in such a position... Also, in the vanishing hope you will get it through your head this time, I was NOT "refusing to follow Misplaced Pages policy". I was refusing to follow your 100% mistaken and misapplied notion of Misplaced Pages policy. Your ignorance of copyright law is total. You should have left copyright-related disputes to an admin who at least had some small working knowledge of the issues involved... As for your hope that I'll be blocked again (expressed on another blanked-out Talk page), sorry but it's pretty unlikely. As Jim mentioned, I'd been here since early `02 without even approaching any sort of disciplinary action. I suppose there may be a few other loose cannon, totally irresponsible admins out there in the Jtkiefer pattern, but the odds are tiny that I'll even cross paths with them. Sorry to disappoint you. ] 04:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC) ::Jeez, it's a good thing you got caught out when you did. No telling what kind of trouble you would have caused as a b'crat. A guy who can't control his 'tonque' has no business in such a position... Also, in the vanishing hope you will get it through your head this time, I was NOT "refusing to follow Misplaced Pages policy". I was refusing to follow your 100% mistaken and misapplied notion of Misplaced Pages policy. Your ignorance of copyright law is total. You should have left copyright-related disputes to an admin who at least had some small working knowledge of the issues involved... As for your hope that I'll be blocked again (expressed on another blanked-out Talk page), sorry but it's pretty unlikely. As Jim mentioned, I'd been here since early `02 without even approaching any sort of disciplinary action. I suppose there may be a few other loose cannon, totally irresponsible admins out there in the Jtkiefer pattern, but the odds are tiny that I'll even cross paths with them. Sorry to disappoint you. ] 04:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

:::JDG, don't antagonize someone when they are already stressed. To JDG: mind ] and ]. ] ] 18:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:44, 10 April 2006

Response to attack

-- Thanks, Jim --

I do feel vindicated. So, I'm back. Maybe I can get somebody to expunge the Block Log, as this guy was pretty clearly out of control. JDG 08:51, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Fuck you, you were the one who was refusing to follow Misplaced Pages policy. Jtkiefer ---- 03:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Jeez, it's a good thing you got caught out when you did. No telling what kind of trouble you would have caused as a b'crat. A guy who can't control his 'tonque' has no business in such a position... Also, in the vanishing hope you will get it through your head this time, I was NOT "refusing to follow Misplaced Pages policy". I was refusing to follow your 100% mistaken and misapplied notion of Misplaced Pages policy. Your ignorance of copyright law is total. You should have left copyright-related disputes to an admin who at least had some small working knowledge of the issues involved... As for your hope that I'll be blocked again (expressed on another blanked-out Talk page), sorry but it's pretty unlikely. As Jim mentioned, I'd been here since early `02 without even approaching any sort of disciplinary action. I suppose there may be a few other loose cannon, totally irresponsible admins out there in the Jtkiefer pattern, but the odds are tiny that I'll even cross paths with them. Sorry to disappoint you. JDG 04:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
JDG, don't antagonize someone when they are already stressed. To JDG: mind WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Moe ε 18:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)