Revision as of 11:46, 26 July 2009 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 208.127.100.233 - "→SCSI: agreed"← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:56, 25 February 2012 edit undo220.253.33.211 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===Neutrality=== | ===Neutrality=== | ||
This seems like nothing more than a smear article - bugs only, no features or real useful information at all. ] (]) 23:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | This seems like nothing more than a smear article - bugs only, no features or real useful information at all. ] (]) 23:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
On the subject of bugs, is it possible to establish a timeline of models so one is aware of what is older/newer and thus able to steer toward new drives that are less prone to failure? | |||
===SCSI=== | ===SCSI=== |
Revision as of 14:56, 25 February 2012
Neutrality
This seems like nothing more than a smear article - bugs only, no features or real useful information at all. --Benjamin Henry (talk) 23:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
On the subject of bugs, is it possible to establish a timeline of models so one is aware of what is older/newer and thus able to steer toward new drives that are less prone to failure?
SCSI
No SCSI information? -Stian (talk) 04:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, WTF?!?! I have hundreds of Seagate Barracuda 9.1gb drives, they surely exist and should be described in that laundry list. There is no mention of SCSI on the entire page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.100.233 (talk) 11:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
What is a difference between "Medalist", "Barracuda" and "U6 family"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.177.230.120 (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)