| Revision as of 03:50, 28 February 2012 editBusterD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators44,975 edits Relisting debate← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:35, 28 February 2012 edit undoCloudz679 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers136,188 edits deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] | :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | <hr style="width:55%;" /> | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Deletion processes exist exactly for this kind of article. Fails various guidelines and policies as mentioned by nominator above. ]] 14:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:35, 28 February 2012
Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein
- Sajda Tere Pyaar Mein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article about a soap opera that provides no evidence of notability. The only mentions in reliable sources I can find are thin passing references such as . This article has already been deleted after a Prod (as not notable) and a speedy deletion (as recreated by a banned user). I don't believe this new TV show (launch Feb 14, 2012) is yet notable enough to support an article. Sparthorse (talk) 02:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Deletion processes exist exactly for this kind of article. Fails various guidelines and policies as mentioned by nominator above. Cloudz679 14:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)