| Revision as of 23:08, 18 February 2006 editKingjeff (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users87,419 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:14, 12 April 2006 edit undo84.60.145.119 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Just growth of the article. If you don't think the template isn't warranted then feel free to remove it. ] 23:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | Just growth of the article. If you don't think the template isn't warranted then feel free to remove it. ] 23:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Hmm, I am myself a fan of this club and I don't think there is much to add to this article and it's also neutral and fair (that isn't really normal for articles about this club, trust me). The only thing that could be mentioned is that nowadays as Reiner Calmund is gone the club has to save money, but this isn't necessary. I will remove the template within a week if nobody answers me back. ] 22:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:14, 12 April 2006
An expert on the club is needed. Kingjeff 21:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- It just underwent a major clean-up. What specifically needs to be addressed? Wiggy! 23:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Just growth of the article. If you don't think the template isn't warranted then feel free to remove it. Kingjeff 23:08, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, I am myself a fan of this club and I don't think there is much to add to this article and it's also neutral and fair (that isn't really normal for articles about this club, trust me). The only thing that could be mentioned is that nowadays as Reiner Calmund is gone the club has to save money, but this isn't necessary. I will remove the template within a week if nobody answers me back. 84.60.145.119 22:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)