Misplaced Pages

Talk:Capture of Garadaghly: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:11, 17 March 2012 editAngel670 (talk | contribs)352 edits Azerbaijani News sources← Previous edit Revision as of 04:10, 21 March 2012 edit undoBoneyard90 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers80,832 edits Assessed for WP: DeathNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Azerbaijan|class=|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Azerbaijan|class=|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Death|class=|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Death|class=start|importance=Low}}
}} }}
{{Olddelrev {{Olddelrev

Revision as of 04:10, 21 March 2012

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Capture of Garadaghly article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAzerbaijan Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijanWikiProject icon
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconDeath Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Articles for deletion reviewThis article was nominated for deletion review on 2010 December 24. The result of the discussion was closed as moot.

Notability and POV

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Most of links that I could control are not neutral. Please find Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources to prove Misplaced Pages:Notability. Takabeg (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Garadaghly Massacre also has many hits: , , , more in Russian sources , , . Since the investigation started more facts are coming out. Angel670 talk 22:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Cornell

Cornell states that Armenian troops conquered these villages which resulted in 99 civilian deaths, this meaning they died during the war and it doesn't say they were massacred, so using it in the header as killing of civilians and using Cornell is not accurate at all.Nocturnal781 (talk) 01:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I suggest you discuss your edits here, otherwise your edits look more like a vandalism than a real edit. Cornell is a good source indicating to the number of casualities. Moreover, Cornell mentions all three villages where civilians were targeted. Meanwhile, to address your concern, I added a text from the book authored by brother of Armenian commander Monte Melkonian where the number is mentioned more than 50 civilians and details of massacre of civilians are described. Angel670 talk 03:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Azerbaijani News sources

Alot of information is cited by Azerbaijani news media, which can't be reliable, or neutral to use in this such case. Misplaced Pages aims to contain reliable information from a neutral view. Please see: WP:NEWSORG. Nocturnal781 (talk) 04:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

As indicated on AfD page by uninvolved editor, the Azerbaijani news media indicate to the notability of the event of the massacre, which Armenian sources do not deny either. I believe this helps. Angel670 talk 03:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories: