Revision as of 23:37, 24 March 2012 editRightCowLeftCoast (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,091 edits →Occupy UC Davis article title has been changed: 2 cents← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:07, 28 March 2012 edit undoMichaelProcton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,103 edits →Occupy UC Davis article title has been changedNext edit → | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:::http://occupyucdavis.org/ No sources? Entire website... Northamerica1000, i think that you should propose requested move, with good explanation, and source listing. Same on you, Viriditas. :) --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 13:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | :::http://occupyucdavis.org/ No sources? Entire website... Northamerica1000, i think that you should propose requested move, with good explanation, and source listing. Same on you, Viriditas. :) --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 13:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
*'''Per RfC'''; may I remind all editors about ] please direct comments about the discussion at hand and not about other editors (see ]). Although the subject "Occupy UC Davis" has a website that doesn't make them notable per ], and given that this article is primarily about an event that is notable per ] but who's notability per ] is questionable I do not at this time support a name change to "Occupy UC Davis". Additionally this article should be checked for neutrality as this events deal with living persons and maybe subject to the ] guidelines. --] (]) 23:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | *'''Per RfC'''; may I remind all editors about ] please direct comments about the discussion at hand and not about other editors (see ]). Although the subject "Occupy UC Davis" has a website that doesn't make them notable per ], and given that this article is primarily about an event that is notable per ] but who's notability per ] is questionable I do not at this time support a name change to "Occupy UC Davis". Additionally this article should be checked for neutrality as this events deal with living persons and maybe subject to the ] guidelines. --] (]) 23:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I am in agreement with the above thoughts from RCLC. Most will come to Misplaced Pages in search of information about the pepper spray event, and that's what most of the article is about. The provided context with regards to the larger event is sufficient, IMP. | |||
] (]) 21:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:07, 28 March 2012
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
To-do list for UC Davis pepper spray incident: edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list is empty: remove {{To do}} tag or click on edit to add an item. |
February reports
Conclusions from the initial reports are expected to start appearing by February 2012. Viriditas (talk) 02:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
So are they back?
The article states that "demonstrators plan to return on January 9, 2012". Have they?--Salix (talk): 08:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, they have. Old news. Viriditas (talk) 08:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Occupy UC Davis article title has been changed
|
A user has recently changed the title of this article from "Occupy UC Davis" to UC Davis pepper-spray incident. I changed the title back to Occupy UC Davis once, but the person who changed the name changed it back, based upon a rationale that most of the sources are about the pepper-spray incident. However, while many of the sources are about this incident, not all of them are.
This is problematic, because the Occupy protests at UC Davis are characterized by more than just once incident that occurred. This title change also sets other sections of the article out of context, such as the "Background" and "Rallies and encampment" sections. Also, Occupy UC Davis has continued to engage in organized meetings, events and actions, which have nothing to do with the pepper-spray incident. Therefore, I place this message here in hopes of obtaining consensus regarding the article's title.
- I propose that the article's title is renamed to "Occupy UC Davis". Northamerica1000 03:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- There are 65 sources supporting the content in this article. The majority of them are about the pepper spray incident. Please list the sources that are only about Occupy UC Davis. Viriditas (talk) 03:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Per RfC. Well, i really dont see problem here. Propose new requested move, gave arguments for both names, and community will decide. We should see what is most common name of this situation. So, i can say only, create requested move template. --WhiteWriter 12:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- So why doesn't he just create a new article about Occupy UC Davis? Well, he can't because there are virtually no sources on the subject. Instead he has to play coatrack and latch on to the notability of the pepper-spray incident to promote the notability of the group. 65 sources and virtually all of them are about the pepper-spray incident. What does that tell you? Viriditas (talk) 12:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well, under that circumstances, req-move will do no harm... And all sides will be pleased. --WhiteWriter 13:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- http://occupyucdavis.org/ No sources? Entire website... Northamerica1000, i think that you should propose requested move, with good explanation, and source listing. Same on you, Viriditas. :) --WhiteWriter 13:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Well, under that circumstances, req-move will do no harm... And all sides will be pleased. --WhiteWriter 13:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Per RfC; may I remind all editors about WP:CIVIL please direct comments about the discussion at hand and not about other editors (see WP:AVOIDYOU). Although the subject "Occupy UC Davis" has a website that doesn't make them notable per WP:ORG, and given that this article is primarily about an event that is notable per WP:GNG but who's notability per WP:EFFECT is questionable I do not at this time support a name change to "Occupy UC Davis". Additionally this article should be checked for neutrality as this events deal with living persons and maybe subject to the WP:BLP guidelines. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- I am in agreement with the above thoughts from RCLC. Most will come to Misplaced Pages in search of information about the pepper spray event, and that's what most of the article is about. The provided context with regards to the larger event is sufficient, IMP.
MichaelProcton (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists, unused
- Misplaced Pages requests for comment