Misplaced Pages

Talk:Antigentilism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:53, 6 March 2012 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,482 editsm Signing comment by 83.12.91.242 - "→Farse: new section"← Previous edit Revision as of 12:42, 22 April 2012 edit undoAnAimlessRoad (talk | contribs)64 edits →Nice Propaganda: new sectionNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


This article is a pure farse. I think one could hardly find a single more biased article in the whole wiki. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> This article is a pure farse. I think one could hardly find a single more biased article in the whole wiki. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Nice Propaganda ==

"Antigentilism is a form of xenophobia which may occur as one response to long Jewish experience of Gentile antisemitism."

This is a false statement and is not verifiable. How do you verify that "antigentilism" only arises as a direct response to "antisemitism"? Following the same logic, one could assert that antisemitism arises in response to Jewish ethnocentrism. There may be some truth to both assertions but it's far more complicated and multi-dimensional than that.

"Some white nationalists have discerned Anti-Christian sentiment in the Talmud."

Another false statement. Emphasising the term "white nationalist" implies that these criticisms arise solely from the white-nationalist community, which is patently false, since Louis Farrakhan was not a white nationalist, last I checked. It also insinuates a racist origin for such criticisms (how can it be racist to merely perceive anti-christian sentiment in a book)?

Anyway, nice propaganda and all, but this article needs more balance.

Revision as of 12:42, 22 April 2012

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antigentilism redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconPsychology NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconDiscrimination NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
NAThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Farse

This article is a pure farse. I think one could hardly find a single more biased article in the whole wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.12.91.242 (talk) 11:52, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Nice Propaganda

"Antigentilism is a form of xenophobia which may occur as one response to long Jewish experience of Gentile antisemitism."

This is a false statement and is not verifiable. How do you verify that "antigentilism" only arises as a direct response to "antisemitism"? Following the same logic, one could assert that antisemitism arises in response to Jewish ethnocentrism. There may be some truth to both assertions but it's far more complicated and multi-dimensional than that.

"Some white nationalists have discerned Anti-Christian sentiment in the Talmud."

Another false statement. Emphasising the term "white nationalist" implies that these criticisms arise solely from the white-nationalist community, which is patently false, since Louis Farrakhan was not a white nationalist, last I checked. It also insinuates a racist origin for such criticisms (how can it be racist to merely perceive anti-christian sentiment in a book)?

Anyway, nice propaganda and all, but this article needs more balance.

Categories: