Revision as of 00:47, 18 April 2006 editCapitalistroadster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users47,872 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:44, 18 April 2006 edit undoJPD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,850 edits →[]: mNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
***Actually I might be confused and it might be a Queensland branch of ''Pauline Hanson's One Nation (NSW Division)'' which wasn't allowed to change its name in June and thus a spearate entity to the Queensland One Nation mob registered in April last year. Still should be kept on the grounds of notable wierdness. Next election, state or federal, it will be useful information if wikified, verified and otherwise improved.--]\<sup>]</sup> 00:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ***Actually I might be confused and it might be a Queensland branch of ''Pauline Hanson's One Nation (NSW Division)'' which wasn't allowed to change its name in June and thus a spearate entity to the Queensland One Nation mob registered in April last year. Still should be kept on the grounds of notable wierdness. Next election, state or federal, it will be useful information if wikified, verified and otherwise improved.--]\<sup>]</sup> 00:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Merge'''. I am inclined to think that the NSW Division might deserve a page as a separately registered and separately operating political party which has had members in parliament. Info on Queensland branches should be included there (or all of it included at ], but I don't see that this branch is significant enough for it's own article. ] (]) 10:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:44, 18 April 2006
East Coast Queensland Branch Pauline Hanson's One Nation New South Wales Division
POV fork. In itself this organisation is not notable. Delete and redirect to Pauline Hanson's One Nation RicDod 13:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Nobody on Earth will search for that title, Delete no real need for redirect. --Eivind 14:35, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Comment.This article has a number of problems. Firstly, it has verifiability problems given that the sources consist of minutes of the Branch meetings and no sources outside One Nation are cited. Secondly, notability given that individual branches of political parties are generally not notable. Thirdly, this appears to have problems with WP:NPOV given that it is written and authorised by a party official. Lastly, it may well be a copyvio. No redirect as noone would look for One Nation under that name. Capitalistroadster 23:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Please see A. Y. Artos's comments below. Delete vote changed. If it is more substantial than a branch and there is verifiable evidence for it such as Electoral Commission registration or some independent verification such as third party media reports then it might be worth keeping and renaming.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 23:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't think it should be redirected to Pauline Hanson's One Nation which we say ceased t exist from 2005. It seems to be new as it claims to have been formed in Ipswich Queensland on the 11th of April 2005. Needs to be verified as registered.--A Y Arktos\ 00:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and rename: From the electoral commission site: "Application by Pauline Hanson's One Nation (NSW Division) to change its registered Party Name and Party Abbreviation" was refused June 2005. There is however One Nation Queensland Division which was registered on 22 April 2005. This is a separate party to Pauline Hanson's One Nation. Article should be kept and renamed. I think, ironically, it is not clear if One Nation is indeed one national party or a series of separate state entities. For example, if you look at those who objected to the renaming of the NSW branch you will find it is their One Nation colleagues in WA who did not want any confusion. Accordingly I support keeping a state branch article - this is not quite the same as an individual branch as per comments by User:Capitalistroadster. I agree it may well be a copyvio but I did not find evidence of that when I searched.--A Y Arktos\ 00:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Actually I might be confused and it might be a Queensland branch of Pauline Hanson's One Nation (NSW Division) which wasn't allowed to change its name in June and thus a spearate entity to the Queensland One Nation mob registered in April last year. Still should be kept on the grounds of notable wierdness. Next election, state or federal, it will be useful information if wikified, verified and otherwise improved.--A Y Arktos\ 00:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge. I am inclined to think that the NSW Division might deserve a page as a separately registered and separately operating political party which has had members in parliament. Info on Queensland branches should be included there (or all of it included at Pauline Hanson's One Nation, but I don't see that this branch is significant enough for it's own article. JPD (talk) 10:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)