| Revision as of 11:55, 4 July 2004 editAndries (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,090 editsm wikify← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:45, 29 July 2004 edit undoThe Anome (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators253,266 edits added criticism of CESNURNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''CESNUR''' is a center for studies on ], based in ], ]. It is an international network of associations of ]s working in the field of ]s. Its director is the Italian scholar ]. CESNUR |
'''CESNUR''' is a center for studies on ], based in ], ]. It is an international network of associations of ]s working in the field of ]s. Its director is the Italian scholar ]. CESNUR claims to be independent of any religious group, church, denomination or association. | ||
| CESNUR gives a greater weight to ] than ] and is critical about concepts like ], ], and ] asserting that they lack ] and scholarly support and are mainly based on ]. | CESNUR gives a greater weight to ] than ] and is critical about concepts like ], ], and ] asserting that they lack ] and scholarly support and are mainly based on ]. | ||
| It has beed described by Apologetics Index as having " gained a reputation for being mostly uncritical and, in fact, supportive of movements considered to be cults by secular anticult- and/or Christian countercult professionals." | |||
| ==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| * | * | ||
| * | |||
| {{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 29 July 2004
CESNUR is a center for studies on new religions, based in Turin, Italy. It is an international network of associations of scholars working in the field of new religious movements. Its director is the Italian scholar Massimo Introvigne. CESNUR claims to be independent of any religious group, church, denomination or association.
CESNUR gives a greater weight to religious freedom than anti-cult activists and is critical about concepts like mind control, thought reform, and brainwashing asserting that they lack scientific and scholarly support and are mainly based on anecdotal evidence.
It has beed described by Apologetics Index as having " gained a reputation for being mostly uncritical and, in fact, supportive of movements considered to be cults by secular anticult- and/or Christian countercult professionals."
External links
This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |