| Revision as of 07:07, 9 May 2012 editWDGraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers45,201 edits →Hi WD: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:36, 9 May 2012 edit undoPenyulap (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,262 edits →Hi WDNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ::::::But if I was shopping about, doesn't that mean that at least one admin must have already given me a decision about the matter ? <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">]</span>] 07:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC) | ::::::But if I was shopping about, doesn't that mean that at least one admin must have already given me a decision about the matter ? <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">]</span>] 07:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::] did give you an answer, you just didn't like it. --'''''] ] ]''''' 07:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC) | :::::::] did give you an answer, you just didn't like it. --'''''] ] ]''''' 07:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::::Well I was going to ask him if he was speaking as an admin or just as an editor, but I saw on his page you asked him to have a look anyhow. I think that it can't be admin shopping if Ckatz is just acting as an editor. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">]</span>] 07:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == List of oko satellites == | == List of oko satellites == | ||
Revision as of 07:36, 9 May 2012
 | If you leave me a message, I will respond here and if followup is required, I will let you know on your talk page using the {{Talkback}} template. |
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:WDGraham/Archive 2024. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
| Archives | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2006 | 2007 |
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
| 2011 | ||
Hi WD
I was just wondering, if at the time or indeed now, that when you deactivated my request for uninvolved assistance on the ISS talkpage, were you aware that it was a request for "uninvolved" assistance ? Penyulap ☏ 04:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- There was a consensus to remove it and end the discussion. --W. D. Graham 06:58, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough, was any party involved in said discussion and consensus uninvolved ? Penyulap ☏ 08:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- That is irrelevant. You can't call someone in from outside to overrule a community decision just because you aren't happy with it. --W. D. Graham 08:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- well, I was sort of considering returning the template for uninvolved help to the talkpage because I'm kind of thinking that a fresh approach from a complete stranger might help change things. Penyulap ☏ 15:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- No, you just want to keep admin shopping, as you have been trying to all along; oh, and for the record, you are the only editor who wants to "change things" - and there is a consensus to keep it the way it is, so are you are saying that you are above consensus? If you try to raise this issue again it will do nothing but prove that you are a disruptive editor, and I will have absolutely no hesitation in requesting that you are either blocked, or topic-banned. --W. D. Graham 16:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- But if I was shopping about, doesn't that mean that at least one admin must have already given me a decision about the matter ? Penyulap ☏ 07:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ckatz did give you an answer, you just didn't like it. --W. D. Graham 07:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well I was going to ask him if he was speaking as an admin or just as an editor, but I saw on his page you asked him to have a look anyhow. I think that it can't be admin shopping if Ckatz is just acting as an editor. Penyulap ☏ 07:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Ckatz did give you an answer, you just didn't like it. --W. D. Graham 07:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- But if I was shopping about, doesn't that mean that at least one admin must have already given me a decision about the matter ? Penyulap ☏ 07:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- No, you just want to keep admin shopping, as you have been trying to all along; oh, and for the record, you are the only editor who wants to "change things" - and there is a consensus to keep it the way it is, so are you are saying that you are above consensus? If you try to raise this issue again it will do nothing but prove that you are a disruptive editor, and I will have absolutely no hesitation in requesting that you are either blocked, or topic-banned. --W. D. Graham 16:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- well, I was sort of considering returning the template for uninvolved help to the talkpage because I'm kind of thinking that a fresh approach from a complete stranger might help change things. Penyulap ☏ 15:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- That is irrelevant. You can't call someone in from outside to overrule a community decision just because you aren't happy with it. --W. D. Graham 08:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Fair enough, was any party involved in said discussion and consensus uninvolved ? Penyulap ☏ 08:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
List of oko satellites
|
Have a ball! |
| Just a note to say that I think your List of Oko satellites is great work. Secretlondon (talk) 21:13, 5 May 2012 (UTC) |
- Thanks --W. D. Graham 10:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:34, 9 May 2012 (UTC)