| Revision as of 23:07, 12 May 2012 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,111 edits old business← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 15 May 2012 edit undoGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,287 edits →Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Wtshymanski: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Per ] and ], it is common practice to use official styling in the infoboxes for nobility and peers. --] (]) 20:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | Per ] and ], it is common practice to use official styling in the infoboxes for nobility and peers. --] (]) 20:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::Combine the Misplaced Pages manual of style and a peerage system and you're bound to get absurdities. Surelyl WP:COMMONNAME trumps? It's not as if Bennett inherited the title or passed it on and he only held his "peerage" for a couple of years. Finally, given the reputation of Canadians who acquired peerages, surely if someone was collecting viscounts they'd be as well served with a redirect to R.B. Bennett? --] (]) 23:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | ::Combine the Misplaced Pages manual of style and a peerage system and you're bound to get absurdities. Surelyl WP:COMMONNAME trumps? It's not as if Bennett inherited the title or passed it on and he only held his "peerage" for a couple of years. Finally, given the reputation of Canadians who acquired peerages, surely if someone was collecting viscounts they'd be as well served with a redirect to R.B. Bennett? --] (]) 23:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Could we just stop for a moment and have a serious conversation? No sarcasm, no blanking your userpage as soon as you see that I tried to reason with you, just a calm, rational discussion. Why don't you try discussion just once to see if it works? | |||
| How many people have to tell you before you admit that you have a problem? Is deleting material that should be ] and being ] really that important to you? Do you really want your legacy to be "pissed off a bunch of people, got banned from editing Misplaced Pages for life, watched as his former victims crawled through his edit history undeleting everything he deleted"? --] (]) 15:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:45, 15 May 2012
This page has been blanked. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC) ..again.
Peerages
Per MOS:HONORIFIC and WP:NCPEER, it is common practice to use official styling in the infoboxes for nobility and peers. --Tærkast (Discuss) 20:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Combine the Misplaced Pages manual of style and a peerage system and you're bound to get absurdities. Surelyl WP:COMMONNAME trumps? It's not as if Bennett inherited the title or passed it on and he only held his "peerage" for a couple of years. Finally, given the reputation of Canadians who acquired peerages, surely if someone was collecting viscounts they'd be as well served with a redirect to R.B. Bennett? --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Wtshymanski
Could we just stop for a moment and have a serious conversation? No sarcasm, no blanking your userpage as soon as you see that I tried to reason with you, just a calm, rational discussion. Why don't you try discussion just once to see if it works?
How many people have to tell you before you admit that you have a problem? Is deleting material that should be preserved and being rude and sarcastic really that important to you? Do you really want your legacy to be "pissed off a bunch of people, got banned from editing Misplaced Pages for life, watched as his former victims crawled through his edit history undeleting everything he deleted"? --Guy Macon (talk) 15:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)