| Revision as of 04:03, 19 September 2010 editTerra Novus (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers2,821 edits →Admin Coaching: Reconfirmation: Heim theory← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:06, 23 May 2012 edit undo68.185.43.47 (talk) →Attribution: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| ==Heim theory== | ==Heim theory== | ||
| Would you be willing to help improve ]? It seems that this article is suffering from under-exposure and to much POV.--<span style="background:saddlebrown; color:red;font-size:small;;font-family:Arial;">]</span><span style="background:darkgreen; color:white;font-size:small;;font-family:Arial;"> ]</span> 04:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | Would you be willing to help improve ]? It seems that this article is suffering from under-exposure and to much POV.--<span style="background:saddlebrown; color:red;font-size:small;;font-family:Arial;">]</span><span style="background:darkgreen; color:white;font-size:small;;font-family:Arial;"> ]</span> 04:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Attribution == | |||
| Dear Seth, | |||
| I am interested in using a photo you posted: Cathedral St.-Pierre in Geneva. Taken Sept 30 2005. | |||
| Unfortunately, I don't understand what attribution is necessary because I don't know what attribution means. Please help me. thank you | |||
| Harold Eberle | |||
Revision as of 02:06, 23 May 2012
Welcome to my talk page; please leave new messages at the bottom. I'll respond on your talk page, unless you request otherwise.
radical alterations to the intro to quantum mechanics article
Hi,
A new editor has unilaterally made many drastic changes to the article Introduction_to_quantum_mechanics to which you have made contributions. I do not think that the changes are desirable. I do not want to start an edit war. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks. P0M (talk)
Hi there -- I discovered that you are the contributor of 
. Please can you tell me why, in that image, you have a W+ boson coupling to four quarks? Surely the W+ in the top of the diagram should couple to an antilepton and an anti-lepton neutrino? 129.67.38.139 (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- It's not the best diagram. I've known for years that this, and a lot of other things from the ATLAS article, need to be fixed. -- SCZenz (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Admin Coaching: Reconfirmation
I was looking through the coaches at Misplaced Pages:Admin_coaching/Status and saw that there are a lot under "reconfirmation".
Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)
If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches.
Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Heim theory
Would you be willing to help improve Heim theory? It seems that this article is suffering from under-exposure and to much POV.--Novus Orator 04:03, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Attribution
Dear Seth, I am interested in using a photo you posted: Cathedral St.-Pierre in Geneva. Taken Sept 30 2005. Unfortunately, I don't understand what attribution is necessary because I don't know what attribution means. Please help me. thank you Harold Eberle