| Revision as of 18:54, 7 April 2006 edit130.232.130.226 (talk) Removed another Epistemic virtue + typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:26, 22 April 2006 edit undoSpencerk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,233 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{merge|Research}} | {{merge|Research}} | ||
| '''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of ], ], ], or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The |
'''Intellectual dishonesty''' is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of ], ], ], or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The truth value of work may be lost as a result. | ||
| Scientists and scholars generally consider ] a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ], and the unsupported amplification of a relationship. | Scientists and scholars generally consider ] a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ], and the unsupported amplification of a relationship. | ||
| ==Intellectual abuse== | |||
| Often, individuals with experience or training in ]s can exploit certain strategies of persuasion or "]". This also appears in overuse of esoteric terminology, or the use of unnecessary ideas in a sentance, like "]". (''see ]''). | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | *] | ||
| *] | |||
Revision as of 06:26, 22 April 2006
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged with Research. (Discuss) |
Intellectual dishonesty is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of rhetoric, logical fallacy, fraud, or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The truth value of work may be lost as a result.
Scientists and scholars generally consider plagiarism a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ellipsis, and the unsupported amplification of a relationship.
Intellectual abuse
Often, individuals with experience or training in arguments can exploit certain strategies of persuasion or "spin". This also appears in overuse of esoteric terminology, or the use of unnecessary ideas in a sentance, like "per se". (see Academic elitism).
See also
- In specific fields:
- Honesty
- Ethics
- Epistemic virtue
- Scientific skepticism
- Scientism
- Rigour
- anti-intellectualism
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |