Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
{{WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities}}
{{WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities}}
{{English variant notice
|small = {{{small|}}}
|form = {{{form|}}}
|id = hieeditnotice
|image = Flag of Liberia.svg
|variant= Liberian English
}}
== a note to helpers ==
== a note to helpers ==
Line 8:
Line 14:
== dynamics ==
The article is looking at two countries in particular just at the moment, although there are certainly a lot of others to cover, like the approaches taken in Germany, China and Sharia law to name just a few possibilities.
I have seen some editors get excited over ] and it's often the case that some British and American editors get ''over''-excited on this topic. So to extinguish the dynamic now, I'll pop a var notice on to illustrate the var of the article. There are enough editors now to make suggestions, and please do feel free to do as you please changing it, or supporting it, or not commenting as you wish. No changes to the article are needed.
Editors might be tempted to go and read up on Liberia before commenting or making changes, but I assure you it's not necessary, and note that if in the future there was an excited discussion about changing away from Liberian, the participants would be obliged to do some study they might not have otherwise wanted to do in order to be impolite to each other. I know perfectly well what I have been adding to the article in phrases and style, but don't see the need to draw attention to the numerous examples of the variant in the article, as the problem has already been solved by the act of opening discussion on the issue at this point. It is actually solved now whether there is any further comment on the topic or not. Any suggestions for change that are made, I will agree with in order to assist in establishing a consensus which can be pointed to in the future. <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">]</span>] 04:53, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities
please do go ahead and knock yourselves out :) I am in no way an ownership kind of person, and cases and discussion about this subject is plentiful. Penyulap ☏19:30, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
The article is looking at two countries in particular just at the moment, although there are certainly a lot of others to cover, like the approaches taken in Germany, China and Sharia law to name just a few possibilities.
I have seen some editors get excited over wp:engvar and it's often the case that some British and American editors get over-excited on this topic. So to extinguish the dynamic now, I'll pop a var notice on to illustrate the var of the article. There are enough editors now to make suggestions, and please do feel free to do as you please changing it, or supporting it, or not commenting as you wish. No changes to the article are needed.
Editors might be tempted to go and read up on Liberia before commenting or making changes, but I assure you it's not necessary, and note that if in the future there was an excited discussion about changing away from Liberian, the participants would be obliged to do some study they might not have otherwise wanted to do in order to be impolite to each other. I know perfectly well what I have been adding to the article in phrases and style, but don't see the need to draw attention to the numerous examples of the variant in the article, as the problem has already been solved by the act of opening discussion on the issue at this point. It is actually solved now whether there is any further comment on the topic or not. Any suggestions for change that are made, I will agree with in order to assist in establishing a consensus which can be pointed to in the future. Penyulap ☏ 04:53, 6 Jun 2012 (UTC)
