Misplaced Pages

User talk:Avidor: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:20, 17 April 2006 editFresheneesz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,055 edits Just to talk← Previous edit Revision as of 21:50, 22 April 2006 edit undoAvidor (talk | contribs)605 edits []Next edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
==]== ==]==
While nothing pleases me more than blocking vandals and the like, we aren't supposed to block any ] permanently unless it's an ]. Furthermore, the address is shared among multiple users, so any block beyond fifteen minutes is frowned upon. If the user keeps up the disruptive behavior, I might be able to ] your talk page, so drop me a line if he keeps it up. Cheers! ] 21:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC) While nothing pleases me more than blocking vandals and the like, we aren't supposed to block any ] permanently unless it's an ]. Furthermore, the address is shared among multiple users, so any block beyond fifteen minutes is frowned upon. If the user keeps up the disruptive behavior, I might be able to ] your talk page, so drop me a line if he keeps it up. Cheers! ] 21:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
]


==Just to talk== ==Just to talk==

Revision as of 21:50, 22 April 2006

User:207.171.180.101

While nothing pleases me more than blocking vandals and the like, we aren't supposed to block any IP address permanently unless it's an open proxy. Furthermore, the address is shared among multiple users, so any block beyond fifteen minutes is frowned upon. If the user keeps up the disruptive behavior, I might be able to semi-protect your talk page, so drop me a line if he keeps it up. Cheers! Deltabeignet 21:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Just to talk

Hey. Putting old conflicts aside, and noting that I know I've been a pompous ass toward you (also noting I think you've been the same to me), I'd be very interested in constructively discussing PRT with an opponent. You're obviously a very adement opponent, and I'd like to hear what you think in a more calm context than a wikipedia talk page. Perhaps you'll convince me of something. What do you say? Fresheneesz 06:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Fine ignore my friendly request. This simply proves to me that you don't care about transportation, you just care about your agenda. I'm not going around saying light rail is a scam, or that heavy rail is a scam, or busses or anything. However all those things lose money, and produce some sort of drain on our economy. This is your argument for what a PRT system would do - the same thing that current systems do. I'm disappointed that you're such an unkind person. Fresheneesz 22:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)