Misplaced Pages

Timuquana Bridge: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:34, 12 June 2012 editSfan00 IMG (talk | contribs)505,076 edits Help needed: 103rd Street← Previous edit Revision as of 14:01, 14 June 2012 edit undoR'n'B (talk | contribs)Administrators420,600 editsm Unlinked: 103rd Street etc.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}} {{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}}
The '''Timuquana Bridge''' was a proposed ] over the ] in ], ] that was never built. The bridge was planned to connect with ] (]{{dn|date=June 2012}}/]) on the west shore of the St. Johns with ] (]) on the east shore. The '''Timuquana Bridge''' was a proposed ] over the ] in ], ] that was never built. The bridge was planned to connect with ] (103rd Street/Timuquana Road) on the west shore of the St. Johns with ] (Butler Boulevard) on the east shore.


The Timuquana was proposed because there is no other bridge crossing the eight-mile stretch of the St. Johns River between the ] and the ], and residents of the Westside wanting to go to the Southside need to travel many miles out of their way to cross the river. However, construction of the Timuquana would require the destruction of a great many houses on both sides of the river, including homes in some very exclusive neighborhoods along the west bank of the St. Johns. Accordingly, there was little to no political support for the idea from the start. The Timuquana was proposed because there is no other bridge crossing the eight-mile stretch of the St. Johns River between the ] and the ], and residents of the Westside wanting to go to the Southside need to travel many miles out of their way to cross the river. However, construction of the Timuquana would require the destruction of a great many houses on both sides of the river, including homes in some very exclusive neighborhoods along the west bank of the St. Johns. Accordingly, there was little to no political support for the idea from the start.

Revision as of 14:01, 14 June 2012

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Timuquana Bridge" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (December 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Timuquana Bridge was a proposed bridge over the St. Johns River in Jacksonville, Florida that was never built. The bridge was planned to connect with State Road 134 (103rd Street/Timuquana Road) on the west shore of the St. Johns with State Road 202 (Butler Boulevard) on the east shore.

The Timuquana was proposed because there is no other bridge crossing the eight-mile stretch of the St. Johns River between the Buckman Bridge and the Fuller Warren Bridge, and residents of the Westside wanting to go to the Southside need to travel many miles out of their way to cross the river. However, construction of the Timuquana would require the destruction of a great many houses on both sides of the river, including homes in some very exclusive neighborhoods along the west bank of the St. Johns. Accordingly, there was little to no political support for the idea from the start.

St. Johns River crossings in the Jacksonville, Florida area
Upriver from Downtown
Downtown Jacksonville
Downriver from Downtown
Italics indicate a bridge was never built.


Stub icon

This article about a specific bridge in the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Stub icon

This article about a building or structure in Florida is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: