| Revision as of 17:08, 8 June 2012 editIjonTichyIjonTichy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,580 edits →Dispute resolution: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:23, 21 June 2012 edit undoLagesvantner (talk | contribs)6 edits →Resource-Based Economy; Alternative use: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "]". Thank you.<!--Template:DRN-notice--> --] (]) 17:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "]". Thank you.<!--Template:DRN-notice--> --] (]) 17:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Resource-Based Economy; Alternative use == | |||
| "The term resource-based economy is also applied to a hypothetical economy in which goods, services and information are produced with such efficiency and abundance as to render them free to the public." | |||
| I originally modified that statement for greater up-front clarification. Hearing someone say, "You can have everything for free" leads you to a very different conclusion than what hearing, "The social and technical hyper-efficiency will allow us to produce goods in such abundance that, based on the Law of Supply and Demand, the price will be so insignificant that it would be essentially free." I understand that it isn't exactly necessary, however, as a member of TZM, I know firsthand how much reading is involved to understand why society will be capable of providing free access to everything and quickly reading 'you can have everything for free' can be very misleading. | |||
| ] (]) 17:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Leo | |||
Revision as of 17:23, 21 June 2012
Hello Earl King Jr. (talk) 04:21, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes, and please go to what ever page is being discussed and we can hold the conversation there. Earl King Jr. (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Resource-based economy". Thank you. --IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 05:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your work
I'm sorry about the misunderstanding(s) we had. I apologize. Thank you for your good work on Resource-based economy. I'm looking forward to continuing to cooperate with you on improving future articles. Regards and best wishes, IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "The Zeitgeist Movement". Thank you. --IjonTichyIjonTichy (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Resource-Based Economy; Alternative use
"The term resource-based economy is also applied to a hypothetical economy in which goods, services and information are produced with such efficiency and abundance as to render them free to the public."
I originally modified that statement for greater up-front clarification. Hearing someone say, "You can have everything for free" leads you to a very different conclusion than what hearing, "The social and technical hyper-efficiency will allow us to produce goods in such abundance that, based on the Law of Supply and Demand, the price will be so insignificant that it would be essentially free." I understand that it isn't exactly necessary, however, as a member of TZM, I know firsthand how much reading is involved to understand why society will be capable of providing free access to everything and quickly reading 'you can have everything for free' can be very misleading.