Revision as of 02:16, 21 June 2012 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,375,693 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:XB70Valyrie/Archive1. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:04, 22 June 2012 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,375,693 editsm Archiving 6 discussions to User talk:XB70Valyrie/Archive1. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|archivebox=yes | |archivebox=yes | ||
}} | }} | ||
== :-) == | |||
Thank you for your recent comments. You may find ] interesting, found on ]. ] (]) 01:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Wow! Have you searched his name in the Admin noticeboards archive as well? | |||
] | |||
I saw activity going back to 2008. The editor in question appears in 332 complaints as either the filer of those complaints or the subject of them. There are accusations of "tag-team reverting". He's been blocked a number of times and has had the accusation of harassment leveled at him repeatedly. Interestingly, I cut my teeth on commenting on videos with people like this on Youtube on various topics. I'm used to it. It's not like it isn't in my genetics to begin with, but it was reinforced to never let people like this allow you to give up on delivering righteousness. Can you imagine a pilot where, as soon as trouble raised its ugly head, he'd get up, leave the cockpit, sit down in first class, and while the aircraft careened towards the ground exclaimed, "Oh I give up!" LoL! | |||
Well, I saw right away that the user fit the typical tea-party member profile. We're doing better now. We'll see how everything finally turns out, but I think we've both comprehended that neither one of us are push-overs. It's just that he seems to find himself in a lot of trouble assuming such role. --] (]) 02:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:I'll look at the link you posted. ] (view 500). Look for the "Be aware" Edit Summaries, for deletion on Talk pages. Here is an example: . Looking back over ] through the years Mr. Rubin seems to be a real fountain of hate, and given that he ] one might call it "]". ] (]) 03:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
::This clearly shows the subject has been deleting other users posts on talk pages with whom he has differences in opinion. A quick FireFox word search brings that all to light in an instant. That's unscrupulous. So, has anything been done? I mean, it seems as if this subject simply terrorizes WP with immunity. Although I might from time to time bumble my way into an honest mistake, I'm glad Misplaced Pages is as meticulous at record keeping as a Nazi death camp. The trail of this subjects abuse is all over.--] (]) 04:59, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::This ] is potentially interesting. a ] reference, then states there isn't a source for wording, then Edit Wars over a synonym. Petty dictator behavior. ] (]) 05:38, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Well. I see the word "mysterious" used in the correction from the June 6th article. ''"...A picture caption on Tuesday with an article about mysterious dolphin and seabird deaths..."'' But I don't see the June 6th article. Is there a link to it. I'm curious. | |||
::::I've had admins on another pilot career related site sanctioned before. I just had to contact the software owners at ]. Ultimately, people who actually run these sites are more contactable than you might think. Admins tend to think people don't know how to contact management, or are just too lazy.--] (]) 06:04, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
{{Od}} | |||
You've seen this, right? ] Look at the way bottom.--] (]) 06:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
I wrote an email to this address and copied this html conversation into it recommending for both his dismissal as an admin and permanently blocking his most used IP. I suggest you do the same.--] (]) 02:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:This may be of interest ... check-out ] on ], ], ], and ]. ] (]) 04:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
::]. ] (]) 06:40, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::I would also recommend calling the Wikimedia Foundation. I can't disclose my contact's name here, because then the user will just rush off and want to lobby that person at Misplaced Pages, but, I have a strange feeling, if you press hard enough, our paths will cross on the same person's desk. | |||
:::::Wikimedia Foundation Inc. | |||
:::::149 New Montgomery Street, 3rd Floor | |||
:::::San Francisco, CA 94105 | |||
:::::USA | |||
:::::'''Phone: +1-415-839-6885''' | |||
:::::Fax: +1-415-882-0495 | |||
:::::::By the way. If you do a Google "Misplaced Pages deletionist (User name) strikes again", you'll find out what makes them tick. AND! You'll see that the person whose article I was working on and this user, probably know of each other. All the pieces fit.--] (]) 07:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::::If the user concerned reads this and thinks they can stop me by suspending my account, I've already backed this section's html up in a word document. As a pilot, I'll bet you couldn't guess that system redundancy is one of my specialties.--] (]) 07:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::::::If you're interested, all those IPs are the same person, and have '''many''' more edits than you or I. Also, I wouldn't think that I could stop you from posting your ... statements ... outside of Misplaced Pages by blocking your account, even if you have no idea what Misplaced Pages is for. I would add, though, that you should only repost ''your'' contributions to the page, or you would risk having a copyright violation if you reposted without appropriate credits. | |||
:::::::::There is a reason that you have been unable to post your article (now on your user page) on Misplaced Pages, and I have had nothing to do with it. — ] ] 19:04, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== June 2012 == | |||
] Please ] other editors, as you did on ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> --] (]) 05:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Who's attacking who? You know what. It really doesn't mater. I'm in contact with Wikimedia management. This has grown beyond the web-pages of Misplaced Pages.org.--] (]) 05:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::Cool down Valyrie......let the issue be solved peacefully...{{smiley}} '''<span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px LightSkyBlue;">]] <sup>]</sup></span>''' 05:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::I've done my homework. I know what motivates the user in question. They are transparent to me.--] (]) 07:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::::Hi XB70Valyrie, I am not sure if you created the video on Youtube but I share a very similar experience with you and I have been heavily attacked not only by Arthur Rubin but also in response to reporting him to the Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. | |||
See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#List_of_potential_candidates_for_the_Nobel_Prize_in_Literature | |||
And: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Abusive_Admin_Arthur_Rubin_-_Please_help | |||
--] (]) 18:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ANI discussion == | |||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ] (]) 18:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== help needed tracking down a document == | |||
Please see ] for my request to find a document you mentioned on that page. ] (]) 20:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== User page change == | |||
Hello, I have made change to your user page. I hope that it solved your problem, otherwise feel free to revert. ] ] ] 21:09, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Notice == | |||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 21:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
==Blocked== | ==Blocked== |
Revision as of 04:04, 22 June 2012
Archives (Index) |
Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Off-wiki harassment, attempted outing, and WP:NOTHERE. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. User:Bwilkins (talk) 23:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
XB70Valyrie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ummm, no Arthur. You didn't get that website to do what you thought they might have done for you. You'll see I added a little ditty to the beginning of my work. That's why the link didn't go there anymore. As for me appealing to be "unblocked"? Puuu-lease! That would be like William Wallace pining to be subject to the tyrannical rule of Long-shanks again. No, no, no. I have Arthur Rubin EXACTLY where I want him. He's in MY...backyard now. I'll like to keep it that way. I can have a different IP every night, if I like. I'd like to keep it that way too. What's more, I have the power not only of the knowledge of "my back yard" on my side, but Rubin is now also transparent to me. Having an ego as big as he does would naturally expose a person like himself to being so easily understood. You'll have to work on that Rubie. You'll come to find now that the longer you hold on to your named account here on Wiki, the more uncomfortable it will get to put that glove on. Probably time to start cultivating one of your many sock-puppets to the level of admin. I think by that time though you'll have another bead drawn on you. The heat is on. =D --XB70Valyrie (talk) 12:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you've abused your right to appeal a block by posting more rants and threats of disruption, I've revoked your right to do so. If you ever change your attitude, you can appeal your block via WP:UTRS or WP:BASC. Bye. Max Semenik (talk) 12:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Misplaced Pages:Five pillars?
Of interest per, "the Revert" along with Special:Contributions/User:Fat&Happy and apparent Misplaced Pages:MEAT User:Vsmith are avoiding the Misplaced Pages:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle on Talk:Religion and environmentalism and Talk:Christianity and environmentalism. Is this a failure of the Misplaced Pages process? 99.181.151.68 (talk) 11:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Banned Forever
On June 2012, the community unanimously held a discussion here: (), and I am here to inform you that you are banned from editing Misplaced Pages. Please do not post an unblock request here. If you feel this ban is unjustified would like to appeal this ban, you may email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Do not evade this block by creating new accounts. Your edits will be seen, reverted on sight. Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 00:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)