Revision as of 04:04, 22 June 2012 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,374,196 editsm Archiving 6 discussions to User talk:XB70Valyrie/Archive1. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:38, 22 June 2012 edit undoVanished user e0713c3d61020017da51b48fb17851ba (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,589 edits no need for notices here.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{banned}} | |||
{{bannedmeansbanned}} |
{{bannedmeansbanned}} | ||
|archiveprefix=User talk:XB70Valyrie/Archive | |||
|format=%%i | |||
|maxarchsize=150000 | |||
|age=72 | |||
|index=yes | |||
|archivebox=yes | |||
}} | |||
==Blocked== | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for Off-wiki harassment, attempted outing, and ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''your reason here''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 23:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC) </div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> | |||
{{unblock reviewed|reason=Ummm, no Arthur. You didn't get that website to do what you thought they might have done for you. You'll see I added a little ditty to the beginning of my work. That's why the link didn't go there anymore. As for me appealing to be "unblocked"? Puuu-lease! That would be like William Wallace pining to be subject to the tyrannical rule of Long-shanks again. No, no, no. I have Arthur Rubin EXACTLY where I want him. He's in MY...backyard now. I'll like to keep it that way. I can have a different IP every night, if I like. I'd like to keep it that way too. What's more, I have the power not only of the knowledge of "my back yard" on my side, but Rubin is now also transparent to me. Having an ego as big as he does would naturally expose a person like himself to being so easily understood. You'll have to work on that Rubie. You'll come to find now that the longer you hold on to your named account here on Wiki, the more uncomfortable it will get to put that glove on. Probably time to start cultivating one of your many sock-puppets to the level of admin. I think by that time though you'll have another bead drawn on you. The heat is on. =D --XB70Valyrie (talk) 12:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
|decline=Since you've abused your right to appeal a block by posting more rants and threats of disruption, I've revoked your right to do so. If you ever change your attitude, you can appeal your block via ] or ]. Bye. ] (]) 12:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
== ]? == | |||
Of interest ], ] along with ] and apparent ] ] are avoiding the ] on ] and ]. Is this a failure of the Misplaced Pages process? ] (]) 11:53, 19 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Banned Forever == | == Banned Forever == | ||
Revision as of 09:38, 22 June 2012
This user is banned from editing the English Misplaced Pages. Administrators, please review the banning policy before unblocking. (block log · contributions) |
Banned Forever
On June 2012, the community unanimously held a discussion here: (), and I am here to inform you that you are banned from editing Misplaced Pages. Please do not post an unblock request here. If you feel this ban is unjustified would like to appeal this ban, you may email arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Do not evade this block by creating new accounts. Your edits will be seen, reverted on sight. Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 00:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)