| Revision as of 19:36, 23 June 2012 editJasper Deng (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,719 edits →Unblocking?: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:46, 23 June 2012 edit undoInterlude65 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,316 edits →Unblocking?: Added commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
| {{unblock|What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me.}} | {{unblock|What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me.}} | ||
| :"Probably compromised" = someone else has breached into your account, or that we believe that you have. This is based on the fact that your disruption increased suddenly very recently. But even if your account is not compromised you have a lot to explain - you'd have to go read ] and ], especially.--] ] 19:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | :"Probably compromised" = someone else has breached into your account, or that we believe that you have. This is based on the fact that your disruption increased suddenly very recently. But even if your account is not compromised you have a lot to explain - you'd have to go read ] and ], especially.--] ] 19:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :*OK, '''NOBODY''' has breached into my account, just myself, breaching into my own account. After seeing all of that vandalism on ] page, that sort of altered my Wikipedian-ness, and that's where those disruptive edits started. But I '''PROMISE''' to not do that anymore. '''So, this has all been a big misunderstanding.''' ] 19:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:46, 23 June 2012
 | This is my own personal talk page. If you wish to discuss anything with me, you've come to the right place. You can also visit my user page by clicking the "User page" tab on the upper left. |
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Welcome to Misplaced Pages: check out the Teahouse!
|
Hello! Interlude65, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Misplaced Pages for new editors to ask questions about editing Misplaced Pages, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 07:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC) |
Blanking and Redirecting
Hi there, I noticed you blanked and redirected the MobileMe page to iCloud. Even though the program (MobileMe) is defunct, it is still something that DID exist... just as we have, on the wiki, articles about Mac OS 10.4, for example. If this is unclear to you, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 15:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Flying Colors (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying Colors (software) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Flying Colors (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment at AfD discussion
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—Northamerica1000 22:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
In regard to your recent edit on Apple, Inc.
Regarding this edit on Apple, Inc: No matter how much you think you might know about computers or the computer business, you can never be a source on Misplaced Pages. That would violate WP:OR. Have a nice day. 02:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
An image or media file,User:Interlude65, has been removed from your userpage, user talk page, or other page because it was licensed as non-free. Misplaced Pages's non-free policy states that Copyrighted images under fair use are only allowed to be used in articles about the subject of the image, and only if no free equivalent is available. For example they are not allowed to be used on user pages, in lists, or (typically) in biographies of living people. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Misplaced Pages's non-free content policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of non-freeimages. Further use of these images will be considered vandalism, and shall be treated as such. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Armbrust, B.Ed. The Undertaker 20–0 12:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Apple Inc.
You are free to add criticism, but not your own. The article is not your soapbox and even a critical section should be written from a neutral point of view.
Regards, O.Koslowski (talk) 19:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Apple Inc., you may be blocked from editing. Krenair 19:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Actually, there's no "may" about it. If I see you restore that section to the Apple, Inc. article again, you will be blocked from editing, because I will do it. Don't simply keep reincluding material over and over until other editors give up: go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue in order to find wording that will be acceptable.—Kww(talk) 21:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster talk 03:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
|
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it has, or may have, been compromised.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. |
The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Unblocking?
Interlude65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to ENDLESS, anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- "Probably compromised" = someone else has breached into your account, or that we believe that you have. This is based on the fact that your disruption increased suddenly very recently. But even if your account is not compromised you have a lot to explain - you'd have to go read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL, especially.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK, NOBODY has breached into my account, just myself, breaching into my own account. After seeing all of that vandalism on 72Dino's page, that sort of altered my Wikipedian-ness, and that's where those disruptive edits started. But I PROMISE to not do that anymore. So, this has all been a big misunderstanding. Interlude 65 19:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)