| Revision as of 00:25, 24 June 2012 editInterlude65 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,316 edits →Unblocking?← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:01, 24 June 2012 edit undoBeeblebrox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators112,480 edits →Unblocking?: nopeNext edit → | ||
| Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
| == Unblocking? == | == Unblocking? == | ||
| {{unblock|What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you |
{{unblock reviewed | 1=What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me. Also, I read the policies that Jasper Deng linked. | decline=Ok, we will accept that your account was not compromised, and it was indeed you that was commiting acts of outright vandalism such as and . There is no possible justification for such behavior, ever. I find your cookie-cutter responses to the questions elow insufficient to convinve that this behavior will not recur. ] (]) 22:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
| :"Probably compromised" = someone else has breached into your account, or that we believe that you have. This is based on the fact that your disruption increased suddenly very recently. But even if your account is not compromised you have a lot to explain - you'd have to go read ] and ], especially.--] ] 19:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | :"Probably compromised" = someone else has breached into your account, or that we believe that you have. This is based on the fact that your disruption increased suddenly very recently. But even if your account is not compromised you have a lot to explain - you'd have to go read ] and ], especially.--] ] 19:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :*OK, '''NOBODY''' has breached into my account, just myself, breaching into my own account. After seeing all of that vandalism on ] page, that sort of altered my Wikipedian-ness, and that's where those disruptive edits started. But I '''PROMISE''' to not do that anymore. '''So, this has all been a big misunderstanding.''' ] 19:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | :*OK, '''NOBODY''' has breached into my account, just myself, breaching into my own account. After seeing all of that vandalism on ] page, that sort of altered my Wikipedian-ness, and that's where those disruptive edits started. But I '''PROMISE''' to not do that anymore. '''So, this has all been a big misunderstanding.''' ] 19:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 24 June 2012
 | This is my own personal talk page. If you wish to discuss anything with me, you've come to the right place. You can also visit my user page by clicking the "User page" tab on the upper left. |
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Welcome to Misplaced Pages: check out the Teahouse!
|
Hello! Interlude65, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Misplaced Pages for new editors to ask questions about editing Misplaced Pages, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 07:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC) |
Blanking and Redirecting
Hi there, I noticed you blanked and redirected the MobileMe page to iCloud. Even though the program (MobileMe) is defunct, it is still something that DID exist... just as we have, on the wiki, articles about Mac OS 10.4, for example. If this is unclear to you, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 15:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Flying Colors (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying Colors (software) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Flying Colors (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment at AfD discussion
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—Northamerica1000 22:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
In regard to your recent edit on Apple, Inc.
Regarding this edit on Apple, Inc: No matter how much you think you might know about computers or the computer business, you can never be a source on Misplaced Pages. That would violate WP:OR. Have a nice day. 02:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
An image or media file,User:Interlude65, has been removed from your userpage, user talk page, or other page because it was licensed as non-free. Misplaced Pages's non-free policy states that Copyrighted images under fair use are only allowed to be used in articles about the subject of the image, and only if no free equivalent is available. For example they are not allowed to be used on user pages, in lists, or (typically) in biographies of living people. As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see Misplaced Pages's non-free content policy and an accompanying essay on the removal of non-freeimages. Further use of these images will be considered vandalism, and shall be treated as such. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Armbrust, B.Ed. The Undertaker 20–0 12:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Apple Inc.
You are free to add criticism, but not your own. The article is not your soapbox and even a critical section should be written from a neutral point of view.
Regards, O.Koslowski (talk) 19:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Apple Inc., you may be blocked from editing. Krenair 19:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Actually, there's no "may" about it. If I see you restore that section to the Apple, Inc. article again, you will be blocked from editing, because I will do it. Don't simply keep reincluding material over and over until other editors give up: go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue in order to find wording that will be acceptable.—Kww(talk) 21:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ... discospinster talk 03:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
|
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it has, or may have, been compromised.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. |
The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Unblocking?
Interlude65 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to ENDLESS, anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me. Also, I read the policies that Jasper Deng linked.
Decline reason:
Ok, we will accept that your account was not compromised, and it was indeed you that was commiting acts of outright vandalism such as this edit and this one. There is no possible justification for such behavior, ever. I find your cookie-cutter responses to the questions elow insufficient to convinve that this behavior will not recur. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- "Probably compromised" = someone else has breached into your account, or that we believe that you have. This is based on the fact that your disruption increased suddenly very recently. But even if your account is not compromised you have a lot to explain - you'd have to go read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL, especially.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- OK, NOBODY has breached into my account, just myself, breaching into my own account. After seeing all of that vandalism on 72Dino's page, that sort of altered my Wikipedian-ness, and that's where those disruptive edits started. But I PROMISE to not do that anymore. So, this has all been a big misunderstanding. Interlude 65 19:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- The ability to keep cool and civil, and to not WP:SHOUT is important here. Compromised or not, you're not going to be unblocked if you can't convince us that you can remain cool even if you see the most atrocious vandalism on someone else's userpage. I linked those policies for a reason, so to convince a reviewing administrator you must explicitly say that you understand and agree to those policies and that you will keep your call on this wiki at all times.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I read the policies listed and I agree and I will keep my call on this wiki at all times. Even if I see the most atrocious vandalism ever made, I will not change my Wikipedian ways and will promise to always make good contributions. Interlude 65 23:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- The ability to keep cool and civil, and to not WP:SHOUT is important here. Compromised or not, you're not going to be unblocked if you can't convince us that you can remain cool even if you see the most atrocious vandalism on someone else's userpage. I linked those policies for a reason, so to convince a reviewing administrator you must explicitly say that you understand and agree to those policies and that you will keep your call on this wiki at all times.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)