Revision as of 03:41, 19 June 2012 editSarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators51,701 edits →Requested move: moved← Previous edit |
Revision as of 17:11, 25 June 2012 edit undoKiefer.Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)39,688 edits →Template:Did you know nominations/Major thirds tuning: new sectionNext edit → |
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
|
:Seems like a good idea. All-thirds tuning was named to be similar with the NPOV all-fourths, all-fifths tuning (not perfect fourths and fifths). However, since there is a "minor thirds tuning" (in theory), "all-thirds" could be ambiguous. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 21:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
:Seems like a good idea. All-thirds tuning was named to be similar with the NPOV all-fourths, all-fifths tuning (not perfect fourths and fifths). However, since there is a "minor thirds tuning" (in theory), "all-thirds" could be ambiguous. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 21:30, 14 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
|
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
The ] still needs to be reviewed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]]</span></small> 17:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |