| Revision as of 16:09, 24 April 2006 editBTfromLA (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,301 edits Does the temporary injunction extend to article talk pages?← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:46, 24 April 2006 edit undoTerryeo (talk | contribs)7,752 edits →Terryeo is selectively removing and altering his talk page discussions: reply of why I did and that differenceNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| It is unclear to me why his is doing this. His explanation does not make sense: "Sure, Fahrenheit451. I removed that older discussion material from my discussion page so as to keep its length within what I consider to be reasonable limits. I understand I could archive it if I chose to, I also understand that every editor may make their own choice, archive or delete at their own whim. I also understand the single item which an editor may not delete from his user page. I did not delete it to present a particular point of view because my point of view is pretty widely recognized and if anyone has any doubt of my stance, my user page tells you what I think of Misplaced Pages and how I hope to achieve a reader being able to come here to our Misplaced Pages and learn about those things which I feel I am capable of contributing about. To be honest, I don't understand your statement, "in a rather POV manner", if you would care to discuss how my deletion of past, resolved (I thought) discussions is contradictory to ongoing discussions, please say so. Terryeo 03:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)" ] 20:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC) | It is unclear to me why his is doing this. His explanation does not make sense: "Sure, Fahrenheit451. I removed that older discussion material from my discussion page so as to keep its length within what I consider to be reasonable limits. I understand I could archive it if I chose to, I also understand that every editor may make their own choice, archive or delete at their own whim. I also understand the single item which an editor may not delete from his user page. I did not delete it to present a particular point of view because my point of view is pretty widely recognized and if anyone has any doubt of my stance, my user page tells you what I think of Misplaced Pages and how I hope to achieve a reader being able to come here to our Misplaced Pages and learn about those things which I feel I am capable of contributing about. To be honest, I don't understand your statement, "in a rather POV manner", if you would care to discuss how my deletion of past, resolved (I thought) discussions is contradictory to ongoing discussions, please say so. Terryeo 03:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)" ] 20:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| : It is a user's perogative to edit their user page. I removed because, as I spelled out when I did, I did not like your invective use of language. I notice you use even stronger language which includes racial slurs on other editor's talk pages. I don't have the administrative status that ] does, but it is nonetheless within my rights as an editor to remove invective statements and past discussions. I thought we had finished the patter drill discussions. I provided you with the information you requested and you wrote the patter drill article which still, largely, stands. ] 17:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Does the temporary injunction extend to article talk pages? == | == Does the temporary injunction extend to article talk pages? == | ||
Revision as of 17:46, 24 April 2006
Terryeo is selectively removing and altering his talk page discussions
It is unclear to me why his is doing this. His explanation does not make sense: "Sure, Fahrenheit451. I removed that older discussion material from my discussion page so as to keep its length within what I consider to be reasonable limits. I understand I could archive it if I chose to, I also understand that every editor may make their own choice, archive or delete at their own whim. I also understand the single item which an editor may not delete from his user page. I did not delete it to present a particular point of view because my point of view is pretty widely recognized and if anyone has any doubt of my stance, my user page tells you what I think of Misplaced Pages and how I hope to achieve a reader being able to come here to our Misplaced Pages and learn about those things which I feel I am capable of contributing about. To be honest, I don't understand your statement, "in a rather POV manner", if you would care to discuss how my deletion of past, resolved (I thought) discussions is contradictory to ongoing discussions, please say so. Terryeo 03:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)" Fahrenheit451 20:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- It is a user's perogative to edit their user page. I removed this because, as I spelled out when I did, I did not like your invective use of language. I notice you use even stronger language which includes racial slurs on other editor's talk pages. I don't have the administrative status that User_talk:SlimVirgin does, but it is nonetheless within my rights as an editor to remove invective statements and past discussions. I thought we had finished the patter drill discussions. I provided you with the information you requested and you wrote the patter drill article which still, largely, stands. Terryeo 17:46, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Does the temporary injunction extend to article talk pages?
The arb com has issued an injunction against Terryeo editing Dianetics- and Scientology-related articles. Does this ban extend to the talk pages on those articles as well? If not, I suggest that the committee consider extending the injunction and any ultimate ban to include those, as in my view much of the Terryeo's disruptive action has taken the form of "wikilawyering" on article talk pages. BTfromLA 16:09, 24 April 2006 (UTC)