| Revision as of 22:17, 26 June 2012 editScottywong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,031 editsm →Unblocking? (2nd nomination): more← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:55, 26 June 2012 edit undoInterlude65 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,316 edits Yay!!! I'm so glad I got my editing privileges back!!! Cleaning out the talk page a little bit.Next edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| ''Interlude65, '''good luck, and have fun.''''' --<small><font face="arial">]<sup>]</sup></font></small> 22:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)</div> | ''Interlude65, '''good luck, and have fun.''''' --<small><font face="arial">]<sup>]</sup></font></small> 22:14, 30 May 2012 (UTC)</div> | ||
| == Welcome to Misplaced Pages: check out the Teahouse! == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Teahouse/Invitation|sign=] (]) 07:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Blanking and Redirecting== | ==Blanking and Redirecting== | ||
| Hi there, I noticed you blanked and redirected the ] page to ]. Even though the program (MobileMe) is defunct, it is still something that DID exist... just as we have, on the wiki, articles about ], for example. If this is unclear to you, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my ]. Thanks! <big>'''] '''</font></big><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 15:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | Hi there, I noticed you blanked and redirected the ] page to ]. Even though the program (MobileMe) is defunct, it is still something that DID exist... just as we have, on the wiki, articles about ], for example. If this is unclear to you, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my ]. Thanks! <big>'''] '''</font></big><sub><small>]</sup></sup></small> 15:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ] (]) 04:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Comment at AfD discussion == | |||
| {{tb|Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Flying Colors (software)}} {{mdash}}<small><font face="arial">]<sup>]</sup></font></small> 22:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == In regard to your recent edit on Apple, Inc. == | == In regard to your recent edit on Apple, Inc. == | ||
| Line 72: | Line 57: | ||
| Regarding edit on ]: No matter how much you think you might know about computers or the computer business, you can never be a source on Misplaced Pages. That would violate ]. Have a nice day. 02:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | Regarding edit on ]: No matter how much you think you might know about computers or the computer business, you can never be a source on Misplaced Pages. That would violate ]. Have a nice day. 02:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | You are free to add criticism, but not your ]. The article is not your ] and even a critical section should be written from a ]. Regards, ] (]) 19:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2012 == | |||
| ] An image or media file,User:Interlude65, has been removed from your userpage, user talk page, or other page because it was licensed as ]. Misplaced Pages's ] states that ''Copyrighted images under fair use are only allowed to be used in articles about the subject of the image, and only if no free equivalent is available. For example they are not allowed to be used on user pages, in lists, or (typically) in biographies of living people.'' As a result, although users are often given a great amount of latitude in the type of content that is allowed on their user pages, it is requested that you abide by this policy. Feel free, however, to add images and media files licensed under other terms. For more information, see ] and an ] on the removal of non-freeimages. Further use of these images will be considered ], and shall be treated as such. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.<!-- Template:uw-fuir --></div> ] <sup><font color="#E3A857">]</font></sup><sub> <font color="#008000">]</font></sub> 12:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Apple Inc. == | |||
| ⚫ | You are free to add criticism, but not your ]. The article is not your ] and even a critical section should be written from a ]. | ||
| Regards, ] (]) 19:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding your personal analysis or ] into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-nor3 --> ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> 19:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | ] Please stop your ]. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's ] by adding your personal analysis or ] into articles, as you did at ], you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-nor3 --> ] <sup>(] • ])</sup> 19:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Actually, there's no "may" about it. If I see you restore that section to the ] article again, you ''will'' be blocked from editing, because I will do it. Don't simply keep reincluding material over and over until other editors give up: go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue in order to find wording that will be acceptable.—](]) 21:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | Actually, there's no "may" about it. If I see you restore that section to the ] article again, you ''will'' be blocked from editing, because I will do it. Don't simply keep reincluding material over and over until other editors give up: go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue in order to find wording that will be acceptable.—](]) 21:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for making significant personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' ] '''</span>]) 18:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''60 hours''' for persistent ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. <font color="DarkGray">...</font> ] <sub>]</sub> 03:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-vblock --> | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk plainlinks" style="padding:5px; width:auto;" | |||
| | ] | |||
| | '''This account has been ] from editing because {{#switch:|checkuser|checkuser=] confirms|yes|yes=}} it has{{#if:||, or may have,}} been ]. {{#if:|<br />The user who legitimately owns this account has created a new account named ].}}''' | |||
| Please refer to {{#if:||]}} for evidence.<br /><small>(see: • ] • • )</small> | |||
| |}]<!-- Template:Compromised account --> | |||
| ] (]) 04:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Unblocking? == | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=What do you mean, "probably compromised"? Why did you change my block settings to '''ENDLESS''', anyway?? Also, I apologize for those disruptive edits I made. I promise to never make a bad contribution ever again, and I actually won't. I hope all of you guys forgive me. Also, I read the policies that Jasper Deng linked. | decline=Ok, we will accept that your account was not compromised, and it was indeed you that was commiting acts of outright vandalism such as and . There is no possible justification for such behavior, ever. I find your cookie-cutter responses to the questions below insufficient to convince that this behavior will not recur. ] (]) 22:01, 24 June 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
| :"Probably compromised" = someone else has breached into your account, or that we believe that you have. This is based on the fact that your disruption increased suddenly very recently. But even if your account is not compromised you have a lot to explain - you'd have to go read ] and ], especially.--] ] 19:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :*OK, '''NOBODY''' has breached into my account, just myself, breaching into my own account. After seeing all of that vandalism on ] page, that sort of altered my Wikipedian-ness, and that's where those disruptive edits started. But I '''PROMISE''' to not do that anymore. '''So, this has all been a big misunderstanding.''' ] 19:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::The ability to keep cool and civil, and to not ] is important here. Compromised or not, you're not going to be unblocked if you can't convince us that you can remain cool even if you see the most atrocious vandalism on someone else's userpage. I linked those policies for a reason, so to convince a reviewing administrator you must explicitly say that you understand and agree to those policies and that you will keep your call on this wiki at all times.--] ] 19:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Well, I read the policies listed and I agree and I will keep my call on this wiki at all times. Even if I see the most atrocious vandalism ever made, I will not change my Wikipedian ways and will promise to always make good contributions. ] 23:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Unblocking? (2nd nomination) == | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=Because it was wrong and not the right thing to do to make those disruptive edits. Now that I've learned my lesson from that, I want to have my editing privileges back. '''I apologize for doing those disruptive edits, I won't do it again and I actually won't.''' ] 14:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC) | accept=Hopefully a lesson has been learned here. Note that future disruption will almost certainly result in an immediate block without warning, and admins will likely be much less willing to overturn future blocks. ]] 22:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 22:55, 26 June 2012
 | This is my own personal talk page. If you wish to discuss anything with me, you've come to the right place. You can also visit my user page by clicking the "User page" tab on the upper left. |
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Blanking and Redirecting
Hi there, I noticed you blanked and redirected the MobileMe page to iCloud. Even though the program (MobileMe) is defunct, it is still something that DID exist... just as we have, on the wiki, articles about Mac OS 10.4, for example. If this is unclear to you, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Theopolisme TALK 15:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
In regard to your recent edit on Apple, Inc.
Regarding this edit on Apple, Inc: No matter how much you think you might know about computers or the computer business, you can never be a source on Misplaced Pages. That would violate WP:OR. Have a nice day. 02:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
You are free to add criticism, but not your own. The article is not your soapbox and even a critical section should be written from a neutral point of view. Regards, O.Koslowski (talk) 19:41, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Apple Inc., you may be blocked from editing. Krenair 19:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Actually, there's no "may" about it. If I see you restore that section to the Apple, Inc. article again, you will be blocked from editing, because I will do it. Don't simply keep reincluding material over and over until other editors give up: go to the article's talk page and discuss the issue in order to find wording that will be acceptable.—Kww(talk) 21:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)