Revision as of 20:34, 13 May 2012 editPolisher of Cobwebs (talk | contribs)29,147 edits tweak lead← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:02, 28 June 2012 edit undoPolisher of Cobwebs (talk | contribs)29,147 edits sort categoriesNext edit → | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
Revision as of 01:02, 28 June 2012
File:Reading Capital.jpgThe 1977 New Left Books edition | |
Author | Louis Althusser, Étienne Balibar, Roger Establet, Jacques Rancière, Pierre Macherey |
---|---|
Original title | Lire le Capital |
Translator | Ben Brewster |
Language | French |
Subject | Philosophy |
Publisher | François Maspero |
Publication date | 1968 |
Publication place | France |
Published in English | 1970 |
Media type |
Reading Capital (Template:Lang-fr) is a 1965 work of Marxist philosophy. The book collects essays developed by Louis Althusser and his students in a seminar on Karl Marx's Das Kapital which took place earlier in 1965. As of 2005 the only English-language edition, a partial translation by Ben Brewster, includes only the contributions of Althusser and Étienne Balibar, while the original French edition includes several additional essays by other students in the seminar, including Roger Establet, Jacques Rancière, and Pierre Macherey. This version and a similarly abridged Italian edition were released in 1970.
Reading Capital contributes to Marxist philosophy, and also marks a moment in the history of structuralism. Althusser considered its return to a detailed engagement with the work of Marx parallel to the return to Freud initiated by Jacques Lacan in psychoanalysis. The book seeks to clarify differences between Marx's and Hegel's dialectics, and to more thoroughly demarcate the "break" which Althusser saw between Marx's later writings (Marxism proper) and his early, Hegelian work. The book also sought to re-establish Marxism as a viable position within philosophy, albeit in a manner influenced by structuralism, against its years of dilution from not only critiques (humanist and Sartrean ones, particularly) but also from the supposedly socialist philosophy of popular liberal-socialist democratic writing and politics.
In a 1970 preface Althusser repudiated some of the positions taken in the book, calling his earlier definition of philosophy as the "theory of theoretical practice" a theoreticist stance and hence "incorrect." The preface also noted that, although all the contributors to the book had taken efforts to distance themselves from the vocabulary and methods of structuralism, the book had often been called a structuralist Marxist work.