| Revision as of 13:46, 29 June 2012 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 3 threads (older than 7d) to User talk:WLU/Archive 9.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:24, 29 June 2012 edit undoWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits →Child pornography article: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| What do you make of ? Like I told ], "I've already replied on the talk page. Judging by the user's , and ones soon after it, I don't believe that this user is new to Misplaced Pages. I also don't know if I yet have any reason to be suspicious of him on child/underage teenager sexual abuse topics, but you know how these type of things begin. He's made a valid point about not all child pornography being sexual abuse, but you and I know that the sources are not usually talking about postpubescents or teenagers who ] each other or any of the examples he mentioned." ] (]) 09:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | What do you make of ? Like I told ], "I've already replied on the talk page. Judging by the user's , and ones soon after it, I don't believe that this user is new to Misplaced Pages. I also don't know if I yet have any reason to be suspicious of him on child/underage teenager sexual abuse topics, but you know how these type of things begin. He's made a valid point about not all child pornography being sexual abuse, but you and I know that the sources are not usually talking about postpubescents or teenagers who ] each other or any of the examples he mentioned." ] (]) 09:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :I'll try to look into this later on today. The point he removed was muddled and badly written, but given the referencing I would suggest rewording rather than removal. Have to look into it more before I give another opinion. ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 15:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:24, 29 June 2012
| Please note that I usually don't do e-mail; if it's about wikipedia use my talk page. |
| If I judge it requires discretion, I'll contact you. This is tremendously one-sided. I assure you, I feel terrible about it. Really I do. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Gulf War Syndrome
If you have time, I'd appreciate your input over at Gulf War syndrome. --sciencewatcher (talk) 22:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
- Heh, because I'm not already involved in a bunch of partisan pages stuffed with nutters :) No promises... WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 00:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks :) --sciencewatcher (talk) 13:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
If you have time, it would be useful to get more editors involved in the Gulf War Syndrome page again. It's just me and the ip editor having an edit war at the moment. He/she has asked Doc James to come in again, and if you could also take a look it would be useful. --sciencewatcher (talk) 23:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Discussion we had on my talk page in January
I finally answered your question... --Bluejay Young (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SudoGhost 19:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC) && 19:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Pierre Charles Alexandre Louis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Child pornography article
What do you make of this edit? Like I told Herostratus, "I've already replied on the talk page. Judging by the user's 'first' edit, and ones soon after it, I don't believe that this user is new to Misplaced Pages. I also don't know if I yet have any reason to be suspicious of him on child/underage teenager sexual abuse topics, but you know how these type of things begin. He's made a valid point about not all child pornography being sexual abuse, but you and I know that the sources are not usually talking about postpubescents or teenagers who sext each other or any of the examples he mentioned." Flyer22 (talk) 09:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'll try to look into this later on today. The point he removed was muddled and badly written, but given the referencing I would suggest rewording rather than removal. Have to look into it more before I give another opinion. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 15:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)