Misplaced Pages

Transnistria conflict: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:19, 24 April 2006 editValentinian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users54,499 edits Romanian side: destubbed (this article is way bigger than 10 sentences = not a stub)← Previous edit Revision as of 23:32, 24 April 2006 edit undoKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 editsm Category:Transnistria - should I add Category:Moldova as well?Next edit →
Line 44: Line 44:
=====Romanian side===== =====Romanian side=====
* *

]

Revision as of 23:32, 24 April 2006

Politics of Transnistria
Constitution
Executive
LegislatureSupreme Council Speaker
Alexander Korshunov
Political parties
Elections
Administrative divisions
  • Five Raions
  • One Municipality
Foreign relations

Diplomatic missions of / in Transnistria

The disputed status of Transnistria arose because of the Transnistrian declaration of independence on Sep. 2, 1990, which is not recognized by Moldova.

Moldova lost control of Transnistria in the 1990 breakup of the Moldavian SSR and the subsequent War of Transnistria, but never formally ceded the territory. Moreover, Transnistria has not been internationally recognised (except by other unrecognised states) and is generally considered to be a part Moldova.

Transnistria's two main political groups, Republic (Respublika) and Renewal (Obnovleniye) oppose any transfer of sovereignty to Moldova, and no major political party or pressure group in Transnistria supports union with Moldova. However, negotiations under OSCE auspices have been ongoing since 1997 based on the premise that better relations are desirable, and that the restrictions on communications, movement of people, and trade flows must be removed.

Historical status of Transnistria

Although ethnic Romanians have historically made up a large minority of the population, the area was never considered part of the traditional lands of Romanian settlement. The territory east of the Dniester river belonged to Kievan Rus' and the kingdom of Halych-Volhynia from the ninth to the fourteenth centuries, passing to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and then into the hands of Russia in the eighteenth century. Even with the rise of Romanian nationalism in the nineteenth century, the far reaches of Transylvania were considered the western boundary of the Romanian lands while the Dniester formed the eastern. The national poet Mihai Eminescu, in his famous poem Doina, spoke of a Romania stretching only "from the Dniester to the Tisza" and not farther east.

In World War II, when Romania, aided by Nazi Germany, for the first time in history took control of Transnistria there was never any attempt to annex the occupied territory beyond the Dniester for it was generally considered merely a temporary buffer zone between Greater Romania and the Soviet front line. Transnistria had never been considered part of Bessarabia. Two preeminent political figures of the day, Iuliu Maniu and Constantin Bratianu declared that "the Romanian people will never consent to the continuation of the struggle beyond our national borders."

Position of the Transnistrian side

The territory to the East of the Dniester River never belonged neither to Romania, nor to its predecessors, such as the Principality of Moldavia. This territory was split off from Ukrainian SSR in a political maneuver of the USSR to become a seed of the Moldavian SSR. (A similar example of a Soviet expansionist maneuver was the Finnish Democratic Republic). Transnistria ceded itself from Moldavian SSR before the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Since Moldova declared independence of the Soviet Union, all political arrangements made within the Soviet Union must be considered void.

Position of the Moldovan side

The Republic of Moldova considers itself the rightful successor state to the Moldavian SSR. It considers the current Transnistrian government to be illegitimate and not the rightful representative of the region's populace. It insists that Transnistria cannot exist as an independent political entity but must be reintegrated into Moldova.

See also

External links

Transnistrian side

Moldovan side

Others

International organizations
Ukrainian side
Russian side
Romanian side
Category: