Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:55, 9 July 2012

Archives
Barnstars · The and Non-notable relatives · 2· 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35

This editor is a Master Editor and is entitled to display this Platinum Editor Star.

Apology

Look here. I did apologize, but I will apologize once again. I'm really sorry, can we please move on now? ~ GabeMc 00:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Move on to your looking at your own version of a consensus that was achieved after many years of arguing? You don't like it, because people contributing to the "Misplaced Pages project The Beatles", like to work with each other towards a peaceful resolution. You are stirring up the mud, which nobody wants. Shame on you.--andreasegde (talk) 00:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Andrea, I'll say it again. It was ip 99.251.125.65 that started it up again, look at the Beatles talk page and McCartney's talk page if you do not believe me. ~ GabeMc 00:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Also, for the record there is no reason why your triangular diplomacy solution cannot be implemented at Pepper as well, it is the third !voting option, maintain. We just have to establish consensus at Pepper either way, that's all. You are getting a little worked up over this IMO. Just relax, it's only a "t". ~ GabeMc 00:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Don't bullshit me with your bullshit. Sorry, I couldn't think of a better word. Of the many that said "Support" on this page, you (of course), did not. You are dragging this thing back into mud again, because you did not "get your own way". People like you have tried these sort of tricks before, and you should be ashamed of your own willingness to have things as you want them. Misplaced Pages is an inter-active project, and you will never subjugate that.--andreasegde (talk) 00:30, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Okay, this has gone way far enough. I sincerely apologize for any comments you took as uncivil, and I will not address the point again. Also, I am formally asking you to cease and desist from posting to my talk page as your behaviour is bordering on harassment. ~ GabeMc 00:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh, that's a good trick, but it's a very old one. I posted one single post (oops, two) on your page about your disgusting accusations, and you have posted more on mine. Do you know how long I've been here, and how often I have seen people like you use tactics like this? Wake up and smell the coffee. :)) --andreasegde (talk) 01:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

GabeMc, by his apology, for something, and then attempting to blame me for another unrelated topic, either doesn't appear to know what he is apologising for, or is attempting another distraction from the real issue, here. I have to agree with you, Andreasegde, regarding this apology as a technique to confuse the issues as these actions exhibit WP:Battleground behaviour, even using guerilla tactics. This history has repeated itself many time in various Beatle's articles now. Insults and innuendos are constantly thrown around and then an apology is issued some of the times, if threatened with correction. The cycle repeats frequently each time a contradictory viewpoint to his is offered. Perhaps this editor is just too emotionally involved, overtired or WP:COMPETENCY is a problem. It would seem he should edit something less controversial for a break.99.251.125.65 (talk) 02:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I agree. It seems Mr. Cockerel wants to rule the roost, by any means at his disposal.--andreasegde (talk) 02:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

The discussion is taking place on the "Pepper" page, and not on The Beatles or McCartney's page. Why, you may ask? Because McCartney is undergoing an FAC, and Mr. Mc doesn't want any fuss, so he thought he could slip it into somewhere else. Very underhand.--andreasegde (talk) 11:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Warring

I just noticed this unbelievably fruitless discussion about The Beatles vs. the Beatles, where there is hardly any talk of the The/the bit and mostly of the "I am good, you are bad" type of attacking. From a neutral point of view, while both of you seem to be acting like little toddlers fighting for the same toy, your comments are significantly less civil and extremely WP:BATTLEGROUND-inducing. Stop. Nobody cares to know who is wrong and who isn't, and your constant barbs are hardly helping you. And yes, any further escalation of this matter, either through insults towards each other or to uninvolved editors, will entail immediate reporting to WP:ANI. And that is not an empty threat. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Then I strongly suggest that you take it there. Being called a person with "OCD" (and other insults), by GabeMc was most unpleasant. I am not "Warring" with him; I am simply presenting the other side which is the present consensus. If you take the time to research the The/the problem, you will find that the aforementioned editor is doing his utmost to revive a years-long argument that nearly destroyed The Beatles Project. BTW, I resent your "little toddlers fighting for the same toy" comment, which is demeaning to both sides. Please proceed.--andreasegde (talk) 17:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Wow, you are far more childish than I expected. You resent practically everything that says something against you. I do hope you have better luck with the administrators. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Calling someone "childish" is an insult, and for you to presume that I "resent practically everything" is nothing short of arrogance, as you do not know me at all. BTW, writing "far more childish than I expected", says an awful lot about your expectations. Why did you expect anything at all? You made a rash generalisation about a person, which is not acceptable. I did say "Please proceed", which was not a request for insults.--andreasegde (talk) 17:37, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Umm, no, calling somebody "childish" is not insulting. I can give you an answer for every statement you make (and each of your statements are becoming funnier than the previous), but on hindsight, that's not necessary. I can see the pointlessness of your prickly and war-inducing comments, so I shall ask an administrator to deal with this matter. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Please proceed. Sorry, did I not mention that before, or are you just posting comments here to make further insults? End of, and goodbye.--andreasegde (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your wish has been granted, Your Highness. The discussion can be seen here, that is if you wish to comment there, Your Majesty. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

It seems (from your posts here), that you don't know when to stop insulting people. Nevertheless, I thank you for proceeding with the matter at hand.--andreasegde (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Ah, but what is insulting and what is not is something that will be decided by a third party. Let me point out that more than one editor has squarely pulled you up for making an extremely uncivil comment at the The/the discussion, so attempts at condescending others is fruitless and may even be dangerous. Take care. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop commenting on my page, as you are being very tedious. The process is in place, so I will await a message confirming that. Of course, if you feel the need to "have the last word" (on my own talk page), it will confirm that you are fairly new here, and do not accept polite requests to cease and desist. The end.--andreasegde (talk) 18:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Final message: first, I am not new here, having been present for over three years and possessing a number of good contributions. I have had a share of unreasonable discussions, which has allowed me to spot one when I see it. I don't need to have "the last word", and "polite requests" filled with bad faith accusations are something of an oxymoron. Lastly, I have no desire of commenting on this page, especially considering the editor you are, but it is necessary to make oneself clear. I believe now would be "The end", though if you would like to insert another reply, you are free to do so. Good day. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I believe the message was "Goodbye/The end", no? Do you often ignore simple requests? BTW, I congratulate you on your three years (26 January 2009), and your number of good contributions (10,463). Goodbye.--andreasegde (talk) 18:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

My two cents: this is the most childish thing I have ever seen on this website. Mythpage88 (talk) 19:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I agree. Sad, isn't it? BTW, will you want the last word as well?--andreasegde (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your conduct is childish and anything but civil. I would suggest that you stop acting like a child. Mythpage88 (talk) 19:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I thought you would do that. More insults...--andreasegde (talk) 19:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Tell me, where did I insult you? Mythpage88 (talk) 19:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)