Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wtshymanski: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:00, 7 July 2012 editCanoe1967 (talk | contribs)10,807 edits Welcome back: need your wisdom← Previous edit Revision as of 14:35, 18 July 2012 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,122 edits edited the pageNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
This page has been edited.
{{collapse top}}
This page has been blanked. --] (]) 19:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
..again.

== Peerages ==

Per ] and ], it is common practice to use official styling in the infoboxes for nobility and peers. --] (]) 20:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
::Combine the Misplaced Pages manual of style and a peerage system and you're bound to get absurdities. Surelyl WP:COMMONNAME trumps? It's not as if Bennett inherited the title or passed it on and he only held his "peerage" for a couple of years. Finally, given the reputation of Canadians who acquired peerages, surely if someone was collecting viscounts they'd be as well served with a redirect to R.B. Bennett? --] (]) 23:04, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

: I don't trust you. This makes meaningful discussion difficult (see ]). Your professed concern for my legacy is doubtless some strategey of yours which I am too thick to figure out. I've learned that making complex hypothetical mental models of the behavior of other people rarely give me any meaningful insight into their next actions and is never worth the effort. To "edit" is also sometimes to delete. --] (]) 16:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

== Thanks for the tip! ==
Dear Wtshymanski, thanks for the tip about adding pages to your watchlist. I can't believe it was that simple. Best regards, ] (]) 16:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC).

==And see==
But I'm being called stupid. --] (]) 16:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

== Intermittent energy source ==

Hi, Wtshymanski. You participated in the discussion about the intermittent energy source and therefore I inform you that there is a ] about merging ] and ] articles. Your opinion is appreciated. ] (]) 14:22, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
<strike>
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Subject matter not notable as it is a modest sized project'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 14:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Material is complete duplication of material in other articles.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 14:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)</strike>
{{collapse bottom}}

== Result of ] ==

Hello, I have closed the above discussion with the following result:

:"All six or so registered editors who have participated in this RfC agree that Wtshymanski's mode of contributing to Misplaced Pages is disruptive. They agree that some of his contributions have merit, but that this is far outweighed by what the commentators consider to be a rude and battleground-like conduct and a lack of the collaborative spirit required for the participation in this project.
:Considering that Wtshymanski has not edited since 16 May 2012, no immediate administrative action appears required. However, I invite Wtshymanski to take the concerns voiced here under serious consideration. Administrative action may be requested if the conduct that has been the focus of this discussion continues."

Regards, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 11:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

== Welcome back ==
I added a section to an article that I need your wisdom on. ] It has been years since I have worked on one of these. Could you take a look if you get a chance?--] (]) 19:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:35, 18 July 2012

This page has been edited.