Misplaced Pages

Talk:Kirkintilloch: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:30, 27 April 2006 editTheMadTim (talk | contribs)243 editsNo edit summary  Revision as of 01:44, 27 April 2006 edit undoJoyous! (talk | contribs)Administrators81,057 edits reasonNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Errrr why was the link to Kirkie Mierda pulled? It's the top ranking site in Yahoo for the search term 'Kirkie'. It does get a lot of hits. I'm not even related to whoever it is that does it, but it's a very popular 'Kirkie' site. I think we should put it back in. --] 01:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC) Errrr why was the link to Kirkie Mierda pulled? It's the top ranking site in Yahoo for the search term 'Kirkie'. It does get a lot of hits. I'm not even related to whoever it is that does it, but it's a very popular 'Kirkie' site. I think we should put it back in. --] 01:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I removed it because it is essentially a personal website with no particular verifiable information about the town. ] | ] 01:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:44, 27 April 2006

Errrr why was the link to Kirkie Mierda pulled? It's the top ranking site in Yahoo for the search term 'Kirkie'. It does get a lot of hits. I'm not even related to whoever it is that does it, but it's a very popular 'Kirkie' site. I think we should put it back in. --TheMadTim 01:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I removed it because it is essentially a personal website with no particular verifiable information about the town. Joyous | Talk 01:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)