Misplaced Pages

User talk:SarekOfVulcan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:30, 30 July 2012 editSarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators51,711 edits Note comment: thx← Previous edit Revision as of 23:31, 30 July 2012 edit undoArcandam (talk | contribs)10,103 edits A kitten for you!: new WikiLove messageNext edit →
Line 94: Line 94:
::, sorry. I saw it as "Since BG is blocked it's not fair to continue discussing when there is no opportunity for rebuttal", but I suppose it can be read other ways. Won't replace. ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 17:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC) ::, sorry. I saw it as "Since BG is blocked it's not fair to continue discussing when there is no opportunity for rebuttal", but I suppose it can be read other ways. Won't replace. ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 17:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
:::Thanks. As I see it, banners like that are only appropriate after there have been declined unblocks, and not even then in all cases. --] 17:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC) :::Thanks. As I see it, banners like that are only appropriate after there have been declined unblocks, and not even then in all cases. --] 17:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

== A kitten for you! ==

]
I noticed a problem on your talkpage: not enough kittens!

] (]) 23:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both"/>

Revision as of 23:31, 30 July 2012

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.
Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26



This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.
Please add new comments in new sections, e.g., by clicking here. Thanks. SarekOfVulcan

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page.

Deletion request

Hello, SarekOfVulcan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

ANI

Hi, can you please clarify this thread? Regards, GiantSnowman 16:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Just sharing something I found really amusing. I'll remove it if nobody's commented on it. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Just confused is all! GiantSnowman 16:36, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Does this help? :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Next time, just make a simple hyperlink. Uncle G (talk) 16:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

I was trying to avoid piling on, which was why I erased the reporter's name from the screenshot and didn't directly link to the explanation. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

CT cancer risk

I have begun a discussion on the talk page. I see this adverse effect as sufficiently notable to be mentioned in the lead. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your talk page please reply on mine) 16:57, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Replied there, thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Why did you revert me Sarek?

Am I not allowed to discuss this with BWilkins? I am trying to work it out so there is no bad blood moving forward. ~ GabeMc 23:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Once an editor says thanks to your horrific battleground behavior, further posts from you will, indeed, be removed at my leisure, continuing to post on their talkpage on the exact same subject is usually a Very Bad Thing. Especially after they already reverted you once. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:49, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I hadn't noticed that Bwilkins reverted me before you did. I won't post there again regarding this issue. Thanks. ~ GabeMc 23:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:54, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Personal attacks at an article talk page

There are numerous personal attacks against me at the Sgt Pepper talk page. Other editors have tried to "hat" them but one or two users keep restoring them. It is my understanding that personal attacks can and should be removed from the talk page. Can you offer any advice in this regard, Thanks. ~ GabeMc 00:53, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

C. Ferris White

thanks for calling this to my attention. Let me know if you disagree with how I handled it. Cbl62 (talk) 16:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Major-thirds tuning sans hyphen?

Hi Sarek of Vulcan !

There is a discussion of hyphenation at major thirds tuning....

In the past, hyphenation has led to blood-shed, and so I trust that your logical mind can help us achieve consensus.

Cheers, Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Deletion review for Jesse Liberty

I have asked for a deletion review of Jesse Liberty. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Msnicki (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Note comment

Hello SoV,

Please note my comment here. Based on your comment on here it looks like you think James edited (i.e. altered) BG's RFC/U posting, but it was a straight-up undo. I'm not saying it was a good idea, just that it at least never said anything BG didn't say in the first place. I've excised BG's comments in the past and deleted whole sections of the talk page, but I realize that's a different (though still questionable) kettle of fish than actually editing content of comments.

My apologies if I'm mis-interpreting your message or intent. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 13:04, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

While WLU has been preparing an RFC/U since March 2011, I'm having to prepare a response quickly, as a work-in-progress. Perhaps this was not the best approach. Since I haven't been preparing for an RFC for over a year, I wouldn't know. However, the opposition should not be able to dictate both sides of the argument by censoring my response.
I have an unrelated, full-time job, so today will be effectively my last day of preparation. When the RFC goes live Monday, I'll be represented only by that response ... or what the others left of it. BitterGrey (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Oops, sorry. I saw it as "Since BG is blocked it's not fair to continue discussing when there is no opportunity for rebuttal", but I suppose it can be read other ways. Won't replace. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 17:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. As I see it, banners like that are only appropriate after there have been declined unblocks, and not even then in all cases. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I noticed a problem on your talkpage: not enough kittens!

Arcandam (talk) 23:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)