| Revision as of 02:48, 3 August 2012 view sourceCoren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,492 edits →User talk:Coren: And in re Cohen← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:48, 3 August 2012 view source Coren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,492 editsm →User talk:Coren: Sometimes, wikimarkup can be so completely inane.Next edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| *Hi YRC, I've reverted you on Coren's talk and re-added the link you wanted to be there to a comment of mine below Ryulong's. Will you stop reverting now? If so, I'll close the AN3 report without taking action. Also, you're at 3RR at ] so you shouldn't revert that again today either. ] (]) 02:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | *Hi YRC, I've reverted you on Coren's talk and re-added the link you wanted to be there to a comment of mine below Ryulong's. Will you stop reverting now? If so, I'll close the AN3 report without taking action. Also, you're at 3RR at ] so you shouldn't revert that again today either. ] (]) 02:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| **And on that subject, YRC, you are threading ''really'' close to a long-lasting block. SlimVirgin gave you quite a bit of trust in unblocking you, and I would have thought that your efforts to deserve that trust would have lasted more than a couple of days.<p>You're not going to want to hear my advice, but you need to heed it regardless: step away from the Cohen article, you're not able to control your behaviour there. This way lies trouble. — ] <sup>]</sup> 02:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | **And on that subject, YRC, you are threading ''really'' close to a long-lasting block. SlimVirgin gave you quite a bit of trust in unblocking you, and I would have thought that your efforts to deserve that trust would have lasted more than a couple of days.<p>You're not going to want to hear my advice, but you need to heed it regardless: step away from the Cohen article, you're not able to control your behaviour there. This way lies trouble. — ] <sup>]</sup> 02:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:48, 3 August 2012
 | Previous account was User:Off2riorob |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
- Welcome to Youreallycan's talkpage. If you are unable to post here follow this link to post at my unprotected talkpage.
Veteran Editor IV
and is entitled to display
this
Gold Editor Star.
 | Youreallycan is burnt out and is taking an extended break from editing wikipedia articles - Youreallycan 04:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC) |
 |
Welcome |
| If you start a discussion here on my talkpage I will likely respond on this page as I like to keep discussion complete in one location. If you post an imo attacking comment here I will just delete it and you will no longer be welcome on my talkpage untill I remove the restriction.If I feel the discussion is confrontational or attacking I also reserve the right to request you to host it on your own talkpage. If I move the discussion to your talkpage please do not replace it here, I will delete it. |
 | This user helped promote Ed Miliband to good article status. |
A bowl of strawberries for you!
|
Thanks for this note two weeks ago about ArbCom rejecting the PC-closing case; it will make figuring out the history much easier in the future. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC) |
Aaaaarrrrrgh!
I hate edit conflicts!!! I'm not going to try again to touch Fetzer's talk page. LadyofShalott 16:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry LofS - I have done there now - we should try to stop the user repeating the ranting on the talkpage now that its freshened up - regards - Youreallycan 16:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for my frustration above. If there's one thing I wish the developers would fix, it's edit conflicts. You and I were trying to do the same sorts of things, but were on top of one another. LadyofShalott 16:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
S Cohen
Stephen_M._Cohen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I am attempting to avoid editing wiki articles but there is still a position here...b - Youreallycan 20:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Why do you persist to protect this man? His illicit activities have been proven in a court of law and the judicial order you are removing shows some of this information quite clearly.—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- thats what I do - I protect all comers from all comers - Youreallycan 00:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
User talk:Coren
You are not welcome to add anything to any comment I have made on any page on Misplaced Pages. I do not care if it is simply a link to the discussion for which I refer to. I will not allow you to modify or add to my non-article space text in any way, shape, or form. Do not add anything to the thread I made on Coren's talk page regarding my issues with your behavior, as it is not what I would do, unless it is your own comment below my own.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
For the last time, do not add this text to my comment on Coren's talk page. It makes it appear that I put it there, and I do not want it to be there. You have now reformatted my own talk page comment three times in a row. Cease and desist immediately.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
I've reported this to WP:AN3.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hi YRC, I've reverted you on Coren's talk and re-added the link you wanted to be there to a comment of mine below Ryulong's. Will you stop reverting now? If so, I'll close the AN3 report without taking action. Also, you're at 3RR at Stephen M. Cohen so you shouldn't revert that again today either. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- And on that subject, YRC, you are threading really close to a long-lasting block. SlimVirgin gave you quite a bit of trust in unblocking you, and I would have thought that your efforts to deserve that trust would have lasted more than a couple of days.
You're not going to want to hear my advice, but you need to heed it regardless: step away from the Cohen article, you're not able to control your behaviour there. This way lies trouble. — Coren 02:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- And on that subject, YRC, you are threading really close to a long-lasting block. SlimVirgin gave you quite a bit of trust in unblocking you, and I would have thought that your efforts to deserve that trust would have lasted more than a couple of days.
Calm down
Did that really just happen? Do I need to explain to you why that's not going to fly? — Coren 02:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)