| Revision as of 20:56, 6 August 2012 editF382d56d7a18630cf764a5b576ea1b4810467238 (talk | contribs)20,803 edits →File:Ethnic cleansing of Serbs from Croatia.jpg: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:01, 6 August 2012 edit undoFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,183 edits →File:Ethnic cleansing of Serbs from Croatia.jpg: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| :::::: Did you just call me hypocritical?! Watch your language. – And no, without even a single reliable source talking about the image, it is everything but clear that it is notable. ] ] 20:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | :::::: Did you just call me hypocritical?! Watch your language. – And no, without even a single reliable source talking about the image, it is everything but clear that it is notable. ] ] 20:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::OK, i will add a lot about this, so it would be very, very clear that this image and event is notable. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 20:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | :::::::OK, i will add a lot about this, so it would be very, very clear that this image and event is notable. --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">]<sup>]</sup></span> 20:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::: The notability of the event is irrelevant. Only the notability of this specific photograph, as reflected in '']'' sources, is at issue. By the way, I have removed the image from the article now. Don't even think of reinserting it before you've found and added those reliable sources. ] ] 21:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
Revision as of 21:01, 6 August 2012
| < August 5 | August 7 > |
|---|
August 6
File:Ken Jennings - What is FedEx.jpg
- File:Ken Jennings - What is FedEx.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by EditorE (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC #8; the Final Jeopardy! round from Mr. Jennings's 75th episode is already very well described in the text. RJaguar3 | u | t 00:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
File:AKB48 1830m Regular Edition Back Cover.jpg
- File:AKB48 1830m Regular Edition Back Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hidayat alfian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
back cover with no specific rationale as to why we need it. Adds little or nothing to reader understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 11:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Catch you video.jpg
- File:Catch you video.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FanofPopMusic (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
random screenshot from a video that shows nothing of great note. Image does not significantly add to reader's understanding of the topic and has a rationale that in no way even hints at what this image is for. Fails WP:NFCC#8 at least. Peripitus (Talk) 11:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Ethnic cleansing of Serbs from Croatia.jpg
- File:Ethnic cleansing of Serbs from Croatia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WhiteWriter (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free historic photograph of a refugee treck in 1991, of undocumented authorship. Purely decorative use in article, not object of analytic discussion; contents could easily be covered by a textual description alone ("roads were crammed with trecks of refugees on tractors, lorries and other makeshift vehicles"). Fails WP:NFCC#8 per WP:NFC#UUI5. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Massive disagree. It is not decorative, it is essential, as this image directly represent aftermath of the situation. Also, i highly doubt that you can "explain" 300 km of refugees, better then just use image of at least part. And it is by far iconic image, included in World's famous photos, as it represent entire Operation Storm, as you may see if you search at least a little bit. Definitely dont fail NFC, questionable request here. --WhiteWriter 17:53, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- You can "explain" 300 km of refugees in words much better than in an image, because the image doesn't show those 300 km at all. But what's really the only thing that matters is that there is no sourced commentary on the photograph as an object of encyclopedic coverage in its own right. That's the criterion, period. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I do not agree with "purely decorative use in the article". The source says: "This photo, called "Trail Of Tears" is one of the most famous and tragic photos taken during the wars in Former Yugoslavia. It shows a column of Krajina Serbs being expelled by Croat forces in 1995 during Operation Storm." --Zoupan 19:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's of no use as long as there is nothing about that in the article and as long as it isn't backed by a reliable source. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- As you saw, we are just discussing on talk page about expansion of the article. It is a bit hypocritical to ask for deletion during that prices, that started yesterday... I would withdraw this, as it is quite clear that image is extremely notable. --WhiteWriter 20:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Did you just call me hypocritical?! Watch your language. – And no, without even a single reliable source talking about the image, it is everything but clear that it is notable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- OK, i will add a lot about this, so it would be very, very clear that this image and event is notable. --WhiteWriter 20:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The notability of the event is irrelevant. Only the notability of this specific photograph, as reflected in reliable sources, is at issue. By the way, I have removed the image from the article now. Don't even think of reinserting it before you've found and added those reliable sources. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- OK, i will add a lot about this, so it would be very, very clear that this image and event is notable. --WhiteWriter 20:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Did you just call me hypocritical?! Watch your language. – And no, without even a single reliable source talking about the image, it is everything but clear that it is notable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- As you saw, we are just discussing on talk page about expansion of the article. It is a bit hypocritical to ask for deletion during that prices, that started yesterday... I would withdraw this, as it is quite clear that image is extremely notable. --WhiteWriter 20:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- That's of no use as long as there is nothing about that in the article and as long as it isn't backed by a reliable source. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I do not agree with "purely decorative use in the article". The source says: "This photo, called "Trail Of Tears" is one of the most famous and tragic photos taken during the wars in Former Yugoslavia. It shows a column of Krajina Serbs being expelled by Croat forces in 1995 during Operation Storm." --Zoupan 19:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- You can "explain" 300 km of refugees in words much better than in an image, because the image doesn't show those 300 km at all. But what's really the only thing that matters is that there is no sourced commentary on the photograph as an object of encyclopedic coverage in its own right. That's the criterion, period. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
File:Alain Rochat Whitecaps FC.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- File:Alain Rochat Whitecaps FC.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dkd1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
publicity photo from the club is likely copyrighted Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.