Revision as of 15:14, 8 August 2012 editSkäpperöd (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,457 edits →re:eeml: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:17, 8 August 2012 edit undoSkäpperöd (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,457 edits →re:eemlNext edit → | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
I see I mentioned you as "ex-(?) leader of the EEML." I did not consider this offensive, as it was pretty clear from the EEML evidence and I remember that someone styled himself "ringleader". | I see I mentioned you as "ex-(?) leader of the EEML." I did not consider this offensive, as it was pretty clear from the EEML evidence and I remember that someone styled himself "ringleader". | ||
However. If you give me your word, explicitely, that you, with the closure of the EEML arbcom, had definitely and ultimately left the group that evolved around you, Volunteer Marek and Molobo, I will take that mention out. ] (]) 15: |
However. If you give me your word, explicitely, that you, with the closure of the EEML arbcom, had definitely and ultimately left the group that evolved around you, Volunteer Marek and Molobo, I will take that mention out. If the EEML did not disband with the closure of the EEML arbcom, I want to know when and if that happened. ] (]) 15:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:17, 8 August 2012
: 632 : 82 : 6 : 22
You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Misplaced Pages Signpost today. |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it. |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
Talk archives:
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Current RfAdminship
Thanks for the starThanks for sending me a star for my 1,000th edit. Nice to get this. There's still a lot to do so I will now aim for the 10,000 mark. This might take a little time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmccawley (talk • contribs) 21:27, April 25, 2012 (UTC) TalkbackHello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Hamish59's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. TalkbackHello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Cycle of Violence.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
transcluded from Poeticbent talkGA review of Prussian Homage (painting)I did a rather extensive copyedit of the first paragraph in the lede and of the historical figures list sections. I have several questions regarding the list. I added a few more comments and the GAList template on this article's GA Review, located Talk:Prussian Homage (painting)/GA1. Hope my comments are helpful. I think we are relatively close to promoting this, as long as those questions are answered and the lede is expanded a bit more. --ColonelHenry (talk) 06:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC) A discussion that I think will be of interest to youSee ]. --Orestek (talk) 17:39, 3 August 2012 (UTC) Ministry of Sport and Tourism (Poland)Moved. There's a bot that should take care of the double redirects. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 18:31, 3 August 2012 (UTC) Template:Did you know nominations/Beilin-Abu Mazen agreementI fixed it again. Is it good enough for a did you know nomination now? Thank you. Futurist110 (talk) 02:19, 4 August 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 06 August 2012
Sorry for the delay!!Ciao, and thank you for your message (May 24, 2011). I could read it only now, I confess I did not know how to talk on wiki before. But... now I'm here! --Sandra.Cavallucci (talk) 12:57, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Fall 2012 Online Ambassador ProgramHi, Piotr! If you're still planning to work with a class in the US and Canada Education Program this Fall, please add your name to this census. Once the new class list is available, I will notify you guys so you can sign up for a class (or two) that interests you. I hope you're still interested in supporting these students for the coming term. I'm guessing you will want to work with professors who come in through ASA, so if that's the case, please indicate how many professors/classes/students you might be able to work with. Thanks! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Curiosity roverHello. I wonder why you took the time and effort messing with the references and violating not only common sense- but the MOS and WP:ASL:
I am sure you wanted to help, but please note it is not your talk page which you can load with flashy tricks and exentricities disregarding the effort of others. BatteryIncluded (talk) 04:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
So trhere, we have a cowboy that not just ignores the rules but denies they exist. For the SECOND time: WP:ASL:
There is nothing beneficial in your little bot/edit. I suggest you dedicate to articles to your caliber such as Betty Crocker. There, you can place your flashy bulshit and Hello Kittys in the reference section instead of the requirements twice indicated above. BatteryIncluded (talk) 13:56, 8 August 2012 (UTC) Featured articlesPiotr, thanks for your suggestion about featuring the entry on Ignatius Lissner. After having found myself involved in some unexpected editing wars on here, I am not sure I want to invite the possible aggrevation. But I appreciate your evaluation of the entry. Daniel the Monk (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC) re:eemlI see I mentioned you as "ex-(?) leader of the EEML." I did not consider this offensive, as it was pretty clear from the EEML evidence and I remember that someone styled himself "ringleader". However. If you give me your word, explicitely, that you, with the closure of the EEML arbcom, had definitely and ultimately left the group that evolved around you, Volunteer Marek and Molobo, I will take that mention out. If the EEML did not disband with the closure of the EEML arbcom, I want to know when and if that happened. Skäpperöd (talk) 15:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC) |