| Revision as of 01:43, 14 August 2012 editDennis Brown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions69,230 edits Marking case as closed← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:19, 14 August 2012 edit undoReaper Eternal (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Administrators62,576 edits Archiving case to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron/ArchiveNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|Marquis de la Eirron}} | {{SPIarchive notice|Marquis de la Eirron}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| {{SPI case status|close}} | |||
| =====<big>06 August 2012</big>===== | |||
| ;Suspected sockpuppets | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=I need to Tan}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| * <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| Repeating the as one , plus , , , and (and more, just for the record) all happen to be adding images uploaded to Commons by a Marquis account there (named Slytherining Around32, same as a previous sock here). <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 10:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Just block per ] if it's easier, I don't mind. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 15:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Checkuser can't confirm innocence, that's a long-established principle. As already shown in the archive he's got access to multiple ISPs including public computers (and even ]), a negative checkuser just means he's using a different public computer probably. As noted above, but deliberately left out of his unblock request, there's also the same edits to ] which go way beyond adding an image - that edit alone is a ] in itself. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 19:19, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | |||
| * Why is checkuser being requested? This isn't clear. <br /> — ] ] 15:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| * Blocked and tagged as ].<br /> — ] ] 16:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Re-opening case. Checkuser seems necessary now that {{user|I need to Tan}} blocked as a ] has has requested it to confirm innocence. ~] <small>(])</small> 19:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| *{{Endorse}} - to clarify. <br /> — ] ] 19:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| *{{inprogress}} per the duckish edits repeating those by a previous sock, and not because of the requested confirmation of innocence - we do not entertain such requests. ] (]) 21:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, CheckUser is not especially helpful. It is possible that the IP is that of a webhost, but I'm told that that's a hard call to make. At any rate, the behaviour is very suggestive. ] (]) 23:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Revision as of 13:19, 14 August 2012
Marquis de la Eirron
Marquis de la Eirron (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Marquis de la Eirron.