Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arunsingh16: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:27, 18 August 2012 editArunsingh16 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,136 edits →Rollback Abuse← Previous edit Revision as of 23:25, 18 August 2012 edit undoDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,520 edits →Rollback AbuseNext edit →
Line 99: Line 99:
:*Dont look, your call. I did not invite you to the issue; you came either by your choice or Abhishek called you. By the way, I went to ANI before you went to an Admin (check the time stamp). If you are judgemental on something then have the courage to face the discussion - don’t run away. Stop bothering me and let the Admins resolve the issue.''']]''' 21:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC) :*Dont look, your call. I did not invite you to the issue; you came either by your choice or Abhishek called you. By the way, I went to ANI before you went to an Admin (check the time stamp). If you are judgemental on something then have the courage to face the discussion - don’t run away. Stop bothering me and let the Admins resolve the issue.''']]''' 21:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
::::::::*William, Before you tell me what to read & understand; read .''']]''' 21:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC) ::::::::*William, Before you tell me what to read & understand; read .''']]''' 21:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

:Arunsingh16, please consider this a warning on two fronts. Firstly, is an entirely unacceptable use of rollback, and you will likely lose your rollback access if you do something similar again.
:Further, please also be aware that you went exceptionally close to a block for edit warring with your last three edits to that page. Any further edit warring may also result in a block, either for yourself or others, should it continue tomorrow or in the near future. 3RR is not an entitlement to make three reverts, and having hit the magic number today means any future edit warring will be viewed in a very negative light.
:I strongly suggest everybody has another attempt at hashing this dispute out on the talk page rather than edit-warring on the article, and should that not work, please consider ].
:Regards,
:] (]) 23:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:25, 18 August 2012

Status: Unknown

User talk

Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Talkback

Hello, Arunsingh16. You have new messages at Faizanalivarya's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New articles

Hello. Thanks for exapnding our coverage of Indian cricketers. Just a quick note, there's no need to add a "See also" section with a link to their team, tournament they play in, and Cricket in India. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 13:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Reply to your message on my talk page

Hello, Arunsingh16. You have new messages at Optakeover's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Brahmeshwar Singh

Hi, i was not engaging in an edit war and my edits were not vandalism. I have no idea of what you are talking about. Those were perfectly legitimate normal edits, and not controversial by any stretch of the imagination. I added categories to the article, an external links section, and also fixed the intro. The intro in the previous version was rather unlettered.

"Brahmeshwar Singh alias Mukhiya was a caste based militia in Bihar.

I also explained my reason for the reversion in this edit summary. I would strongly suggest that you think straight and assume good faith the next time, and refrain from sending such unwarranted bogus warnings. That's against Misplaced Pages's policies. As a long-time Wikipedian, i personally found the warning to be a tad bit aggravating and insulting. I have retired from active editing anyway, and will not bother undoing your reversion. I just noticed the article, and felt like making some constructive minor edits to the article. Joyson Prabhu 18:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Joyson Prabhu; firstly tone down a bit and stop using multiple accounts to revert some edits. What is written in the article is a fact and you are distorting it. Singh is a convict & a criminal who is responsible for over 300 murders (please read news articles). It does not matter what you feel like but this is the fact. He (Singh) himself has denied entering politics whereas you were trying to change his status from 'Criminal' to a 'Politician'. Indian court found him a convict and it is NOT my personal judgement. You cannot change facts and also what has been reported in media widely. Please refrain from reverting / amending the changes or else I will have to report you. Please feel free to contribute to the article in a constructive way. Cheers AKS 18:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Arun Singh, the article is not your private property for you to grant me permission to contribute to the article, and warn me not to undo your reversion. Furthermore, you have no right to order me to tone down, after having sent me absurd warnings and falsely accusing me of sockpuppeteering twice without any proof. Assuming good faith and not asserting ownership over articles are not guidelines. These are core Misplaced Pages policies, and you have violated them repeatedly. Having said all that, i must say that you are under a grave misunderstanding! I am not abusing multiple accounts, and am not the operator of the other account. If you have any doubt, feel free to make an inquiry at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations. I changed his occupational status from "Fighter of Naxals" to "Politician", as i mistakenly assumed that he was one. Also, i didn't change or distort any info. The intro states that Singh was reported to be brutal, founder & head of militia Ranvir Sena that killed over 300 people and i changed it to the head and founder of the upper-caste militia Ranvir Sena, which killed over 300 people. You did not specify any reason for your removal of the cats, external links, and persondata. I have reverted the edits, but kept his occupation as criminal, removed the politician category, and added the criminal category. Any further act of article ownership, reversion as vandalism, or issue of false warning on your part will result in yourself being reported to WP:ANI. Joyson Prabhu 19:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Joyson Prabhu; I know I don’t own any article but neither do you. You are attempting to fabricate the article to suite & glorify Singh. Please take your emotions outside Misplaced Pages (I am sorry that I have to impart such an advice to a very experienced person like you). And yes, next time, tone down if you want to talk to me. Barring the "External Links", I am restoring the original text. What is written in the article, is from the media & public sources and if you have mistaken him to be a politician which I reverted and identified (as it changed the meaning of the article to a great extant) as vandalism, then you don’t have anyone else but yourself to blame for. Please do not compel me to report yet vandalism or report another user. Before executing any further changes, please first discuss here. Cheers AKS 20:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Nirupama Pathak death case

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Nirupama Pathak death case, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from see talk page, and therefore to constitute a violation of Misplaced Pages's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Misplaced Pages, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Misplaced Pages article layout. For more information on Misplaced Pages's policies, see Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Nirupama Pathak death case saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. Happy editing! —SpacemanSpiff 06:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

help

Hi friend... i want to add more details thirunagar page(http://en.wikipedia.org/Thirunagar)... im finding difficulties in editing... so if u r ready to help, i wil provide u with all informations and photos and u can edit that page... reply me as soon as possible... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsteen Ravi (talk • contribs) 11:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited The Mule (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to a better STiki !

Hello, Arunsingh16, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Misplaced Pages with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBigXray 22:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Arunsingh16. You have new messages at Vejvančický's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:50, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lakhumal Hiranand Hiranandani

You really need to give a reason for this deletion if you expect it to go through. Mangoe (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, I am not sure what other reasons should I give as the AfD has been tagged with notably issues. Cheers AKS 15:31, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Rollback Abuse

You have clearly abused your rollback privileges as you did here. From your contributions, it is clear that you always want to own an article you edit and that's not how things work here. Shame! — Abhishek  10:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

The consensus, based on talk page, is that the financial information doesn't belong in the article....William 17:44, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
And take a look at the joke of the year here. You don't seem to realise that SpacemanSpiff has never been blocked and the thread you started against him and Joyson Prabhu at ANI are archived as WP:BOOMERANG :P — Abhishek  19:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
User:Abhishek191288; explain to me where in Misplaced Pages is it mentioned that market share or financial information cannot be mentioned. Show me the clause. Until then, your actions are termed as unexplained removal of content. You also changed the article for POV which is incorrect. Please explain that also. Singh's article has nothing to do with what we are discussing here. Also, please explain how my rollback privileges were abuse and what shame are you talking about? Be civil when you discuss with experienced editors, especially once when you have lost that discussion several months back. I am reverting your changes on that article and should you want any changes, please discuss with undersigned without any prejudice or personal comments. Cheers AKS 19:47, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
User:WilliamJE What consensus are you talking about & where? Who reached to such consensus? Please explain. Cheers AKS 19:47, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Here it is. It's the first topic discussed....William 20:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
I have read that and that is your opinion on an old matter. If you want consensus, start a new forum and dont term your opinion as consensus. Cheers AKS 20:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
No its your responsibility to change the prior consensus, not me. I will bring in an administrator if you refuse to comply....William 20:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Feel free to get an admin. Cheers AKS 20:08, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
I already have....William 20:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
By the way, even I already have escalated the matter to admins as previously also it was escalated to them and they only resolved it. Abhishek went to the extent of changing content as an anonymous user and I reported that incident. In any case, you also need to explain me ‘’’which’’’ policy in Misplaced Pages mentions that Financial or market share information cannot be mentioned. If that is the case then several thousand articles on Misplaced Pages will be under severe default. Think about it. Cheers AKS 20:17, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Please see this Cheers AKS 20:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm not going to look at anything. An administrator has been called for, you went to ANI, and there is always this reply WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I have stepped back for now like I said to the administrator. When they reply, i might chime in, but till then. Also I ask you please stop putting talkbacks on talk page....William 21:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Dont look, your call. I did not invite you to the issue; you came either by your choice or Abhishek called you. By the way, I went to ANI before you went to an Admin (check the time stamp). If you are judgemental on something then have the courage to face the discussion - don’t run away. Stop bothering me and let the Admins resolve the issue. Cheers AKS 21:22, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Arunsingh16, please consider this a warning on two fronts. Firstly, this is an entirely unacceptable use of rollback, and you will likely lose your rollback access if you do something similar again.
Further, please also be aware that you went exceptionally close to a block for edit warring with your last three edits to that page. Any further edit warring may also result in a block, either for yourself or others, should it continue tomorrow or in the near future. 3RR is not an entitlement to make three reverts, and having hit the magic number today means any future edit warring will be viewed in a very negative light.
I strongly suggest everybody has another attempt at hashing this dispute out on the talk page rather than edit-warring on the article, and should that not work, please consider content dispute resolution.
Regards,
Daniel (talk) 23:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)