| Revision as of 03:49, 22 August 2012 editGhajinidetails (talk | contribs)1,211 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:17, 22 August 2012 edit undoAloak1 (talk | contribs)272 edits →Mai Baap: new WikiLove messageNext edit → | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| Every Bolywood films should have information of screen count when it is releasing.So I added Rowdy rathore screen count.Its not a vandalism.Not even think about it. --] (]) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | Every Bolywood films should have information of screen count when it is releasing.So I added Rowdy rathore screen count.Its not a vandalism.Not even think about it. --] (]) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Mai Baap == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Allah ''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | teri ************** ] (]) 08:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 08:17, 22 August 2012
 Archives | |||||||
|
|||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
CVUA
 |
We see that you need a little more understanding of Counter-Vandalism before you're granted Rollback. The Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy exists to help users, like yourself, understand the way to identify and handle Vandalism through one-on-one instruction. Perhaps you'd like to ask a question of our instructors, or perhaps Enroll in the Academy. |
Reply
Shoot. Secret of success (talk) 07:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keeping the box office numbers in the infobox requires more detail in brackets. This causes clutter and has to be updated everyday. Hence, it is advisable to add the gross once the film has completed its major run. Regards, Secret of success (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Btw, I have restored your edit on the Pakistani screening. Sorry about reverting it. Secret of success (talk) 15:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
If you have seen the film, please try to add a plot section too. Thanks. Secret of success (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Jannat 2
Hi! I could not understand what was the problem with my edits. I provided reliable sources for each and edited the whole page just like that. 111.92.95.82 (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
CVUA
 |
Hi there, Zeeyanwiki! There's been a reply to your request for enrollment over at the CVUA Enroll Page - why don't you give it a look? You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Template:CVUA Enroll Talkback}} template. |
Hi Zeeyanketu, welcome to the CVUA! I will be your instructor and hope that you'll have a really great experience, and learn along the way. I have created an academy page specifically for you, located at User:ItsZippy/CVUA/Zeeyanketu, which we will use to track your progress (there is an introduction there, which will explain things a little better). I like to tailor my courses to my students, so if there is anything that you would like to cover in more detail, or anything you think I could do better, please let me know. I am also available for more general advice about anti-vandalism, so please ask me if you ever have any questions. ItsZippy 19:30, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
RE
ETT So you will decide what is the best format? Don't boss around.--almightyvegeta (talk) 19:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Top Most respected critics should come first. That should be the order from now.
Don't fight and agree with it.--almightyvegeta (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Putting Taran Adarsh's Review on top is disrespect to wikipedia itself. I suggest not to include his reviews in future. Masand and Anupama are the most respected critics ask anyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almightyvegeta (talk • contribs) 20:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC) TA is a Box office critic not a film critic. If you are on twitter then you'll know what Taran's reputation is. His Sold old reviews should be barred from wiki.--almightyvegeta (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. When you recently edited Ek Tha Tiger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Sources for nett gross in India for Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia.com cannot be used as official reference(tracker) for Bollywood films nett collections in India. BoxofficeIndia is not updating its website on a regular basis ,so the reports og nett collections in India are reported very late on its website.Also, Misplaced Pages is not able to utilize lists of film grosses created by Box Office India, until permission is provided to the Wikimedia Foundation of permission by Box Office India. Respected critics such as Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta are giving regualar and genuine nett collection figures in India for Bollywood films.Taran Adarsh has website www.bollywoodhungama.com and Komal Nahta has website www.koimoi.com We can also use OneIndia.com, The Times of India as sources it doesn’t means that a magazine like Hindustan Times or The hindu will not report genuine sources ,compared to a not so updated website of BoxofficeIndia.com BoxofficeIndia should be used only when other sources stop giving gross report.First bring a consensus on this nett gross issue. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Its looks ridiculous,that by Monday,August 20,2012 at around 4 pm,the news of Ek tha tiger grossing 100 crore nett in India,came out on www.bollywoodhungama.com and even Taran Adarsh also tweeted the 100 crore figure.crossed in 5 days only.TV news channels like CNN-IBN,Zee-News,ABP News and Aaj Tak all showed 100 crore news of Ek tha Tiger on Monday itself .But BoxofficeIndia figures are so clumpsy and outdated.they showed ek tha tiger crossed 100 crore in 6 days and reported that news on Tuesday,August 21,2012.They even haven’t given reports of Bol Bachchan crossing 100 crore nett in India,while the news has already came out on all TV channels.Can u show me piece of information that Misplaced Pages wants only this waste crap website www.BoxofficeIndia.com source only? --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Sources for worldwide gross and overseas gross of Bollywood films
BoxofficeIndia has demerit that it is not giving overseas reports of films on a regular basis.It will show figues only once or twice,So u cannot include BoxofficeIndia figures. Also,When u wil see infobox of Holywood films,they have worldwide gross. So try to include worldwide gross which includes domestic gross(nett gross in India+entertainment tax) and overseas gross. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 20:16, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
BoxofficeIndia doesn’t give overseas information within week.Also it is not generally much detailed.So don’t go for BoxofficeIndia.com as it doesnot give country-by-country breakup of collections. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
CVUA
Hi Zeeyanketu, your first task is waiting for you at your academy page. It would be helpful if you could add that page to your watchlist, so that I don't need to let you know every time anything changes. Is that ok? Let me know if you have any problems. ItsZippy 16:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Screens count of a Bollywood film’s release needed.
Every Bolywood films should have information of screen count when it is releasing.So I added Rowdy rathore screen count.Its not a vandalism.Not even think about it. --Ghajinidetails (talk) 7:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Mai Baap
|
Allah |
| teri ************** Aloak1 (talk) 08:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC) |