| Revision as of 11:50, 30 April 2006 editJJay (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,366 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:35, 30 April 2006 edit undoWarriorScribe (talk | contribs)1,372 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. ]. 09:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. ]. 09:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Strong delete'''. Calling this a "mini series" seems to be a bit pretentious as it looks to be an investigative report from a local news station aired 13 years ago. I get 26 googles for the report, some of which are not relevant . If this had greater impact - released on video, converted into a book, etc. - then maybe there would be something worth salvaging. As it stands, though, it is not a valid topic for an article, unless we want articles on individual stories from 60 Minutes, A Current Affair and the Insider. -- ] 11:50, 30 April 2006 (UTC) | * '''Strong delete'''. Calling this a "mini series" seems to be a bit pretentious as it looks to be an investigative report from a local news station aired 13 years ago. I get 26 googles for the report, some of which are not relevant . If this had greater impact - released on video, converted into a book, etc. - then maybe there would be something worth salvaging. As it stands, though, it is not a valid topic for an article, unless we want articles on individual stories from 60 Minutes, A Current Affair and the Insider. -- ] 11:50, 30 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Merge''' per JzG. | |||
Revision as of 14:35, 30 April 2006
Preying from the Pulpit
Delete. This is a non-notable subject. It was a nightly news series from an unknown station, on an unknown date, at an unknown time Vivaldi (talk) 08:08, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to the FBC, Hammond article. It has little wider relevance outside of FBC and its people. Just zis Guy you know? 08:41, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable enough. - Richardcavell 08:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kimchi.sg 09:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Calling this a "mini series" seems to be a bit pretentious as it looks to be an investigative report from a local news station aired 13 years ago. I get 26 googles for the report, some of which are not relevant . If this had greater impact - released on video, converted into a book, etc. - then maybe there would be something worth salvaging. As it stands, though, it is not a valid topic for an article, unless we want articles on individual stories from 60 Minutes, A Current Affair and the Insider. -- JJay 11:50, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per JzG.