Misplaced Pages

Tarkhan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:00, 27 August 2012 editGreczia (talk | contribs)401 edits correcting falsification of sources← Previous edit Revision as of 10:26, 27 August 2012 edit undoGreczia (talk | contribs)401 edits undoing falsification of sources and contentNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
Although ] reports that the word "was probably foreign to ]", hence considered to be a loanword from Turkic, G. Doerfer points out that even in Turkic languages, its ] is not Turkic (sing. ''tarxan'' --> plur. ''tarx'''at'''''), suggesting a non-Turkic origin.<ref name="Doerfer">G. Doerfer, ''Mongolo-Tungusica'', O. Harrassowitz, 1985, University of Virginia.</ref> L. Ligeti comes to the same conclusion, saying that ''"tarxan and tegin form the wholly un-Turkish plurals tarxat and tegit"'' and that the word was unknown to medieval western Turkic languages, such as ].<ref>L. Ligeti, ''Researches in Altaic languages'', e. A. Kiadó, 1975, University of Michigan, p. 48</ref> However ] argues that there is a resemblance between the dominant plural suffix '''-t''' and the Old Turkic plural suffix '''-tı''' (''oglı'''tı'''''/''kulu'''tı'''''), or '''-tar''' (''kırgıt'''tar'''''), as attested in the ]. In post-inscriptional Uyghur, ''tegi'''t'''-'''lär''''' was also attested.<ref>Marcel Erdal, Old Turkic Word Formation: A Functional Approach to the Lexicon, Vol. 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1991, pp.78, ISBN 978-344-703-084-7</ref> Taking this in consideration, the word is most likely derived from medieval Mongolian ''darqat'' (Mongolian plural suffix '''-at'''),<ref name="Marcel Erdal, Mongol"></ref> itself perhaps derived from the earlier Sogdian word ''*tarxa'''n'''t'' ("free of taxes").<ref name="Doerfer" /> In contrast L. Rogers argues that the Mongolian ''darxan'' is an ancient loan word from the Turkic ''tarqan'', and likely originated from the ] and ] (where it was associated with a title for nobility),<ref name="Leland Liu Rogers"></ref> whereas ] suggests the well-known Turkic title ''tarqan'' and Mongolian ''darxan''/''daruyu'', both preserving an original Xiongnu word.<ref name="Universität Bonn.">Universität Bonn. Seminar für Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft Zentralasiens: Zentralasiatische Studien, Vol. 24-26, p.21</ref> Abaev gives the additional elaboration that the related East Iranian Scythian (and ]) word ''*tarxan'' (from ] ''*tarkāna'', "judgment")<ref>Lars M. Hoffmann, Anuscha Monchizadeh, Zwischen Polis, Provinz und Peripherie: Beiträge Zur Byzantinischen Geschichte und Kultur, Otto Harrassowitz, 2005, p.378: Although ] reports that the word "was probably foreign to ]", hence considered to be a loanword from Turkic, G. Doerfer points out that even in Turkic languages, its ] is not Turkic (sing. ''tarxan'' --> plur. ''tarx'''at'''''), suggesting a non-Turkic origin.<ref name="Doerfer">G. Doerfer, ''Mongolo-Tungusica'', O. Harrassowitz, 1985, University of Virginia.</ref> L. Ligeti comes to the same conclusion, saying that ''"tarxan and tegin form the wholly un-Turkish plurals tarxat and tegit"'' and that the word was unknown to medieval western Turkic languages, such as ].<ref>L. Ligeti, ''Researches in Altaic languages'', e. A. Kiadó, 1975, University of Michigan, p. 48</ref> However ] argues that there is a resemblance between the dominant plural suffix '''-t''' and the Old Turkic plural suffix '''-tı''' (''oglı'''tı'''''/''kulu'''tı'''''), or '''-tar''' (''kırgıt'''tar'''''), as attested in the ]. In post-inscriptional Uyghur, ''tegi'''t'''-'''lär''''' was also attested.<ref>Marcel Erdal, Old Turkic Word Formation: A Functional Approach to the Lexicon, Vol. 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1991, pp.78, ISBN 978-344-703-084-7</ref> Taking this in consideration, the word is most likely derived from medieval Mongolian ''darqat'' (Mongolian plural suffix '''-at'''),<ref name="Marcel Erdal, Mongol"></ref> itself perhaps derived from the earlier Sogdian word ''*tarxa'''n'''t'' ("free of taxes").<ref name="Doerfer" /> In contrast L. Rogers argues that the Mongolian ''darxan'' is an ancient loan word from the Turkic ''tarqan'', and likely originated from the ] and ] (where it was associated with a title for nobility),<ref name="Leland Liu Rogers"></ref> whereas ] suggests the well-known Turkic title ''tarqan'' and Mongolian ''darxan''/''daruyu'', both preserving an original Xiongnu word.<ref name="Universität Bonn.">Universität Bonn. Seminar für Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft Zentralasiens: Zentralasiatische Studien, Vol. 24-26, p.21</ref> Abaev gives the additional elaboration that the related East Iranian Scythian (and ]) word ''*tarxan'' (from ] ''*tarkāna'', "judgment")<ref>Lars M. Hoffmann, Anuscha Monchizadeh, Zwischen Polis, Provinz und Peripherie: Beiträge Zur Byzantinischen Geschichte und Kultur, Otto Harrassowitz, 2005, p.378:
*"''V.I. Abaev , der das ossetische Wort tærxon >>Gericht<< nicht als eine Entlehnung aus dem türkischen tarqan * tarxan oder dem mongolischen darxan ansieht, sondert das Wort aus dem indoiranischen ''*tarkāna''- (vgl. altindisch tarkana - >>Urteil; Annahme, Mutmaßung<<) ableitet.''" <small>'''Reference:'''<small> (see below) *"''V.I. Abaev , der das ossetische Wort tærxon >>Gericht<< nicht als eine Entlehnung aus dem türkischen tarqan * tarxan oder dem mongolischen darxan ansieht, sondert das Wort aus dem indoiranischen ''*tarkāna''- (vgl. altindisch tarkana - >>Urteil; Annahme, Mutmaßung<<) ableitet.''" <small>'''Reference:'''<small> (see below)
**</small> (V.I. Abaev, Tarxan, in: Saenatmecniero krebuli. Tbilisi 1979, p.21-25)</small></ref> still survives in ] ''tærxon'' ("argument, trial") and ''tærxon kænyn'' ("to judge").<ref name="Ossetic" /> ] also proposes an Iranian (]) root for the word.<ref>Bailey, H W. 1985. . Cambridge Univ. Press. (Reviewed )</ref> Han-Woo Choi proposes the same origin for Turkic ''tarqan'', Mongolian ''darxan'', and Korean ''tarho-'', interpreting this as a proof for early contacts between Central Asia and the ]. Regarding the etymology of these words, he suggests that the Sogdian ''trґwn'' may give further answers.<ref>Han-Woo Choi, , Handong University</ref> **</small> (V.I. Abaev, Tarxan, in: Saenatmecniero krebuli. Tbilisi 1979, p.21-25)</small></ref> still survives in ] ''tærxon'' ("argument, trial") and ''tærxon kænyn'' ("to judge").<ref name="Ossetic" /> ] also proposes an Iranian (]) root for the word.<ref>Bailey, H W. 1985. . Cambridge Univ. Press. (Reviewed )</ref> Han-Woo Choi indicates that the Mongolian meaning 'a blacksmith' is more original than the Sogdian meaning "free of taxes". Regarding the etymology of the ] form ''*tarkW'', Choi suggests that the Sogdian ''trґwn'' form of the word ''tarqan'' may give further answers. Furthermore he proposes the same origin for Turkic ''tarqan'', Mongolian ''darxan'', and Korean ''tarho-'', interpreting this as a proof for early contacts between Central Asia and the ] rooted in an ancient period of Turkic or ] ]. <ref>Han-Woo Choi, , Handong University</ref>

According to D. Theodoridis it should not be ignored that since the beginning of the 1920's British scientists have developed the assertion that the word ''tarqan'' and the ] personal name ] (]) could be attributed to one and the same etymon.<ref> Lars M. Hoffmann, Anuscha Monchizadeh, Zwischen Polis, Provinz und Peripherie: Beiträge Zur Byzantinischen Geschichte und Kultur, chapt. by Dimitri Theodoridis: Tarhānīyāt, Otto Harrassowitz, 2005, pp.378:
*"''Es darf in diesem Zusammenhang nicht außer acht gelassen werden, dass britische Forscher die kühne Behauptung aufgestellt haben, wonach das Wort tarxan und der etruskische Personenname Tarquinus auf ein und dassselbe Etymon zurückzuführen wären.''" <small>'''References:'''<small> (see below)
**], The Mongol title tarkhan, in: Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1917), p.834:
***"''And I do not suppose that there can be any doubt that the names Tarchon, Tarquin and Tarkhan are identical.''"
**], Tarkhan and Tarquinus, in: Ebenda (1918), pp.122-123; and H. Beveridge, pp.314-316</ref>

The Mongolian word darxan also is used as an adjective meaning 'sacred or celebrated' in Lessing's dictionary (1960).<ref>Lessing, F.D., Mongolian-English Dictionary, 1960, p.236</ref>


What is certain is that ''Tarkhan'' is not related to the Turco-Mongol royal title '']''/'']''.<ref name="Qarib" /><ref name="Turkic1"></ref> What is certain is that ''Tarkhan'' is not related to the Turco-Mongol royal title '']''/'']''.<ref name="Qarib" /><ref name="Turkic1"></ref>

Revision as of 10:26, 27 August 2012

This article is about Tarkhan, an ancient Turkic title. For other uses, see Tarkan and Darkhan

Tarkhan (Old Turkic Tarqan; Mongolian: Darkhan; Template:Lang-fa; Chinese: 達干; Template:Lang-ar; alternative spellings Tarkan, Tarkhaan, Tarqan, Tarchan, Tarxan, Tarcan, Targan) is an ancient Central Asian title used by various Indo-European (i.e. Iranian and Tokharian), Turkic, Hun, Xiongnu and Mongol peoples, especially in the medieval era, and prominent among the successors of the Mongol Empire.

Etymology

The word Tarkhan has been studied by many scholars. Tarqan has generally been interpreted as “a title of nobility”, but no complete consensus has been reached on its analysis, therefore the origin of the word is uncertain. Various historians identify the word as either Turkic, Iranian or Mongolian.

Although R. Frye reports that the word "was probably foreign to Sogdian", hence considered to be a loanword from Turkic, G. Doerfer points out that even in Turkic languages, its plural is not Turkic (sing. tarxan --> plur. tarxat), suggesting a non-Turkic origin. L. Ligeti comes to the same conclusion, saying that "tarxan and tegin form the wholly un-Turkish plurals tarxat and tegit" and that the word was unknown to medieval western Turkic languages, such as Bulgar. However M. Erdal argues that there is a resemblance between the dominant plural suffix -t and the Old Turkic plural suffix -tı (oglı/kulu), or -tar (kırgıttar), as attested in the Yakut language. In post-inscriptional Uyghur, tegit-lär was also attested. Taking this in consideration, the word is most likely derived from medieval Mongolian darqat (Mongolian plural suffix -at), itself perhaps derived from the earlier Sogdian word *tarxant ("free of taxes"). In contrast L. Rogers argues that the Mongolian darxan is an ancient loan word from the Turkic tarqan, and likely originated from the Xiongnu and Huns (where it was associated with a title for nobility), whereas Edwin G. Pulleyblank suggests the well-known Turkic title tarqan and Mongolian darxan/daruyu, both preserving an original Xiongnu word. Abaev gives the additional elaboration that the related East Iranian Scythian (and Alanic) word *tarxan (from Indo-Iranian *tarkāna, "judgment") still survives in Ossetic tærxon ("argument, trial") and tærxon kænyn ("to judge"). Harold Walter Bailey also proposes an Iranian (Khotanese Saka) root for the word. Han-Woo Choi indicates that the Mongolian meaning 'a blacksmith' is more original than the Sogdian meaning "free of taxes". Regarding the etymology of the Korean form *tarkW, Choi suggests that the Sogdian trґwn form of the word tarqan may give further answers. Furthermore he proposes the same origin for Turkic tarqan, Mongolian darxan, and Korean tarho-, interpreting this as a proof for early contacts between Central Asia and the Korean peninsula rooted in an ancient period of Turkic or Proto-Altaic smith-shamanism.

According to D. Theodoridis it should not be ignored that since the beginning of the 1920's British scientists have developed the assertion that the word tarqan and the Etruscan personal name Tarquin (Tarquinius) could be attributed to one and the same etymon.

The Mongolian word darxan also is used as an adjective meaning 'sacred or celebrated' in Lessing's dictionary (1960).

What is certain is that Tarkhan is not related to the Turco-Mongol royal title Khan/Khaqan.

The word was borrowed into many languages, including Armenian tʿarxan, Georgian t’arxani and Russian тархан.

History

It was used among the various Iranian (Sogdians, Khotanese, and Hephthalites), Mongol and Turkic peoples of Central Asia and other steppe people, and was a high rank in the army of Tamerlane. Tarkhans commanded military contingents (roughly of regimental size under the Khazar khan) and were, roughly speaking, generals. They could also be assigned as military governors of conquered regions.

The Göktürks probably adopted the title of Darqan (Mongolian spelling) from the Mongol-speaking Rourans or Avars. The Tarkhan were cited in inscription of Kul Tigin (d. c.731 CE). They were given high honors such as entering the ger of Khagan without any prior appointment and shown unusual ninefold pardon to the 9th generation from any crime they committed. Although, the etymology of the word is unknown, it is attested under the Khitans who ruled most of Mongolia and North China between 916 and 1125.

Like many titles, Tarkhan (Turkic spelling) also occurs as a personal name, independent of a person's rank, which makes some historical references confusing. For example, Arab texts refer to a "Tarkhan, king of the Khazars" as reigning in the mid ninth century. Whether this is a confused reference to a military official or the name of an individual Khazar khagan remains unclear. The name is occasionally used today in Turkish and Arabic speaking countries.

In the Mongol Empire, the Darkhan were exempted from taxation, socage and requisitioning. Genghis Khan made those who helped his rise Darkhans in 1206. The families of the Darkhan played crucial roles later when the succession crisis occurred in Yuan Dynasty and Ilkhanate. Abaqa Khan (1234–1282) made an Indian Darkhan after he had led his mother and her team all the way from Central Asia to Persia safely. A wealthy merchant of Persia was made of Darkhan by Ghazan (1271–1304) for his service during the early defeat of the Ilkhan. In Russia, the Khans of the Golden Horde assigned important tasks to the Darkhan. A jarliq of Temur Qutlugh (ca. 1370–1399) which authorized rights of the Tarkhan found in Crimea.

During the Yuan Dynasty (1271–1368), the title was bestowed mainly on the late Darkhans' families and the government officials.

After suppressing the rebellion of the right three tumens in Mongolia, Dayan Khan exempted his soldiers, who participated the battle of Dalan-Terqin, from imposts and made them Darkhan in 1513. Even after the collapse of the Northern Yuan with the death of Ligdan Khan, the title of Darkhan was bestowed on religious dignitaries, sometimes on persons of low-birth. For example, in 1665, the Khotgoid Altan Khan Lubsan bestowed the title on a Russian interpreter and requested the Russian Tsar to exempt the interpreter from all tax obligations.

The word refers the Blacksmith and is still used in Mongolia as privilege.

A Tarkhan established the Turkic Tarkhan Dynasty, ruling the Sindh region in modern-day Pakistan from 1554 to 1591 AD.

The town of Tutrakan (Тутракан) in Nort-East Bulgaria is said to have been found by the noble Turu Tarkan from the First Bulgarian Empire and still bears, slightly modified, his name.

See also

In fiction

Notes

  1. ^ A Study of the Ancient Turkic "TARQAN", Han-Woo Choi, Handong University
  2. Leland Liu Rogers – The Golden Summary of Cinggis Qayan: Cinggis Qayan-u Altan Tobci, p.80
  3. ^ Paul Ratchnevsky – Genghis Khan: his life and legacy, p.82
  4. ^ Qarīb, Badr-az-Zamān. 1995. Sogdian dictionary: Sogdian – Persian – English. Tehran: Farhangan Publ.
  5. Jonathan Karam Skaff, Sui-Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power, and Connections, 580-800, Oxford University Press, 2012, p.396
  6. ^ Leland Liu Rogers, The Golden Summary of Cinggis Qayan: Cinggis Qayan-u Altan Tobc, Otto Harrassowitz, 2009, p.80
  7. ^ Universität Bonn. Seminar für Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft Zentralasiens: Zentralasiatische Studien, Vol. 24-26, p.21
  8. Murat Ocak in: Hasan Celāl Güzel, Cem Oğuz, Osman Karatay, The Turks: Early ages, Yeni Türkiye, 2002, p.86 , ISBN 9756782552, 9789756782552, University of Michigan
  9. Frye, Richard N., "Tarxun-Turxun and Central Asian History", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1/2 pp. 105–129
  10. A.S. Amanjolov, History of Ancient Türkic Script: Chapter 10: Genesis of Türkic Runic Alpabet, Mektep Publishing, Almaty, 2003, p.293:
    • "The Türkic-linguality of the dynastic tribe of the Usun (As-Sün - Türk. As' Hun) union was stated by F.Hirt, K.Siratori, N.A.Aristov and other researchers after analysis of the Chinese transcriptions of the Usun words (kün beg, uluγ, tarqan, etc.). "The presence of Türkic words in the language of ancient Usuns in the 3rd - 1st cc. BC, - noted Yu.A.Zuev, - makes questionable the standard in the Soviet historical literature point of view about so-called "Türkifation" of the local population in Kazakhstan and Central Asia by the Huns (Chinese: Sünnu), beguning in the 1st century BC"."
  11. Central Asiatic Journal, O. Harrassowitz, 1993, v. 37, University of Michigan
  12. ^ Agustí Alemany, Sources on the Alans, Brill Academic Publishers, 2000:
    • "Abaev considers this word (lacking in a Turco-Mongolian etymology), as well Old Hungarian tarchan “olim judex”, borrowing from Scythians (Alans) *tarxan “judge” -> Ossetian. Taerxon “argument, trial”; cf. the Ossete idioms taerxon kaenyn “to judge” (+ kӕnyn “to do”) and tӕrxon lӕg “judge” (+l ӕg man). Iron ævzag"
  13. ^ Marcel Erdal, A Grammar Of Old Turkic, BRILL, 2004, p.128, ISBN 978-900-4102-94-1
  14. ^ G. Doerfer, Mongolo-Tungusica, O. Harrassowitz, 1985, University of Virginia.
  15. L. Ligeti, Researches in Altaic languages, e. A. Kiadó, 1975, University of Michigan, p. 48
  16. Marcel Erdal, Old Turkic Word Formation: A Functional Approach to the Lexicon, Vol. 1, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 1991, pp.78, ISBN 978-344-703-084-7
  17. Lars M. Hoffmann, Anuscha Monchizadeh, Zwischen Polis, Provinz und Peripherie: Beiträge Zur Byzantinischen Geschichte und Kultur, Otto Harrassowitz, 2005, p.378:
    • "V.I. Abaev , der das ossetische Wort tærxon >>Gericht<< nicht als eine Entlehnung aus dem türkischen tarqan * tarxan oder dem mongolischen darxan ansieht, sondert das Wort aus dem indoiranischen *tarkāna- (vgl. altindisch tarkana - >>Urteil; Annahme, Mutmaßung<<) ableitet." Reference: (see below)
      • (V.I. Abaev, Tarxan, in: Saenatmecniero krebuli. Tbilisi 1979, p.21-25)
  18. Bailey, H W. 1985. Indo-Scythian Studies: being Khotanese Texts, VII. Cambridge Univ. Press. (Reviewed here)
  19. Han-Woo Choi, A Study of the Ancient Turkic "TARQAN", Handong University
  20. Lars M. Hoffmann, Anuscha Monchizadeh, Zwischen Polis, Provinz und Peripherie: Beiträge Zur Byzantinischen Geschichte und Kultur, chapt. by Dimitri Theodoridis: Tarhānīyāt, Otto Harrassowitz, 2005, pp.378:
    • "Es darf in diesem Zusammenhang nicht außer acht gelassen werden, dass britische Forscher die kühne Behauptung aufgestellt haben, wonach das Wort tarxan und der etruskische Personenname Tarquinus auf ein und dassselbe Etymon zurückzuführen wären." References: (see below)
      • H. Beveridge, The Mongol title tarkhan, in: Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1917), p.834:
        • "And I do not suppose that there can be any doubt that the names Tarchon, Tarquin and Tarkhan are identical."
      • F. W. Thomas, Tarkhan and Tarquinus, in: Ebenda (1918), pp.122-123; and H. Beveridge, pp.314-316
  21. Lessing, F.D., Mongolian-English Dictionary, 1960, p.236
  22. Pelliot – Neuf Notes, p.250
  23. Eberhard – Conquerors and Rulers, p.98
  24. Wittfogel et al – Liao dynasty, p.433
  25. http://reff.net.ua/26327-YArlyki_hanov_Zolotoiy_Ordy_kak_istochnik_prava_i_kak_istochnik_po_istorii_prava.html
  26. Paul Ratchnevsky – Genghis Khan: his life and legacy, p.243
  27. Michael Kohn – Mongolia, p.126

External links

Mongol Empire
Terminology
Titles
  • Political
  • Military
  • Politics
  • Organization
  • Life
Topics
Khanates
Major cities
  • Campaigns
  • Battles
Asia
Central
East
Southeast
South
Europe
Middle East
Civil wars
People
Great Khans
Khans
Military
Timeline of the Mongol Empire
Northern Yuan (1368–1635)
Political organizationList of KhansIndependent khans
Six Tumen MongolsFour OiratNotable citiesTitles

Three Eastern Tumens
Khalkha
Chahar
Uriankhai
Three Western Tumens
Ordos
Tumed
Yunshebu Tümen

Choros
Torghut
Khoid
Dörbet Oirat

Yingchang
Karakorum
Hohhot

Khagan
Khan
Khatun
Taishi
Jinong
Khong Tayiji
Noyan
Tarkhan
Councellor
Wang

UnifiedChahar

Ukhaantu Khan Toghun-Temur (1368–1370)
Biligtü Khan Ayushiridara (1370–1378)
Uskhal Khan Tögüs Temür (1378–1388)
Jorightu Khan Yesüder (1388–1391)
Engke Khan (1391–1394)
Elbeg Nigülesügchi Khan (1394–1399)
Gün Temür Khan (1399–1402)
Örüg Temür Khan Gulichi (1402–1408)
Öljei Temür Khan Bunyashiri (1403–1412)
Delbeg Khan (1411–1415)
Oyiradai Khan (1415–1425)
Adai Khan (1425–1438)
Tayisung Khan Toghtoa Bukha (1433–1452)
Agbarjin (1453)
Esen Taishi (1453–1454)
Markörgis Khan (Ükegtü) (1454–1465)
Molon Khan (1465–1466)
Manduul Khan (1475–1479)

Dayan Khan (1480–1516)
Bars Bolud Jinong (deputy)
Bodi Alagh Khan (1516–1547)
Darayisung Gödeng Khan (1547–1557)
Tümen Jasaghtu Khan (1557–1592)
Buyan Sechen Khan (1592–1604)
Ligdan Khan (1604–1634)
Ejei Khan (1634–1635)

TumedOrdosTüsheetJasagtuSechenKhotogoid

Altan Khan (1521–1582)
Sengge Düüreng Khan (1583–1585)
Namudai Sechen Khan (1586–1607)
Boshugtu Khung Taiji (1608–1636)

Barsu-Bolod (d. 1521)
Mergen Jinong (d. 1542)
Noyandara Jinong (1543–1572)
Buyan Baatur Taiji (1573–1576)
Boshugtu Jinong (1577–1624)
Erinchen Jinong (1624–1636)

Abtai Sain Khan (1567–1588)
Eriyekhei Mergen Khan (1589–?)
Gombodorji Khan (d. 1655)
Chakhun Dorji Khan (1654–1698)

Laikhur Khan
Subandai Khan
Norbu Bisireltü Khan (d. 1661)
Chambun Khan (1670?–)
Zenggün
Shara (d. 1687)

Soloi Maqasamadi Sechen Khan (1577–1652)
Baba Sechen Khan (1653–?)
Sechen Khan (d. 1686)

Ubasi Khong Tayiji (c.1609–1623)
Badma Erdeni Khong Tayiji (1623–1652)
Erinchin Lobsang Tayiji (1652–1667)

Categories: