| Revision as of 19:06, 28 August 2012 editChipmunkdavis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,423 edits →Former countries: Thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:20, 28 August 2012 edit undoDanlaycock (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors31,459 edits →Former countries: npNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ::{{done}} - Both templates should be working now. ] (]) 03:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC) | ::{{done}} - Both templates should be working now. ] (]) 03:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::Appears they are. ] is a working example, if you're interested. Thanks, maybe one day I'll learn the code. ] (]) 19:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC) | :::Appears they are. ] is a working example, if you're interested. Thanks, maybe one day I'll learn the code. ] (]) 19:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::No problem! ] (]) 22:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:20, 28 August 2012
| This is Danlaycock's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
Kosovo recognition
I don't see something that should be discussed. All the publication in the article have they reference. For example FM of Kazakhstan said that "...." is a fact. We can't change the context of discussion. What is the problem here? I'm open to discuss. (In the sub article about Greek opinion is mentioned the fact that Athens support Kosovo Eu integration, and Kosovo membership to IBRD; See Greece's reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence) Irvi Hyka (talk) 00:23, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- But the quote you are including doesn't say that Kazakhstan supported Kosovo's membership in the IBRD. It says that they will think about it. That's not notable. I'm happy to discuss this on the talk page (there's already a discussion started there) but you need to self-revert as per WP:BRD. Edit warring in your desired changes is not the appropriate way to handle the situation. TDL (talk) 22:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
What is the difference between "completely ratified" and "deposited"?
I am not an expert in this field, and also think other editors wonder about it. So I posted the question at the talkpage of the "Fiscal Compact". I hope you can help me out, and post a good reply at talkpage. Best regards, Danish Expert (talk) 21:38, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
European Union
I think you may have made a mistake removing my edit on the EU, my edit was not personal opinion but fact, I do however acknowledge that I may not of referenced these facts, something which I will do now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.217.47 (talk) 08:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- No it wasn't a mistake, your edit was soapboxing. One of the five pillars of wikipedia is that content must adhere to a neutral point of view. Your edit was written as an attack on the EU, not a neutral description. I strongly suggest that you do not re-add this content to the article and instead start a discussion on the article's discussion page. Here you can propose changes and other editors will weight in and help you formulate your edit in a neutral manner. TDL (talk) 08:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Former countries
Could you apply the changes you made to the country infobox somehow to Template:Infobox former country? It's even more desirable there, as it's not a snapshot of the present. Cheers, CMD (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, can do. Unfortunately both templates are fully protected so I can't make the changes myself. But I've made an edit request here so it should be dealt with shortly. TDL (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Done - Both templates should be working now. TDL (talk) 03:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
- Appears they are. Republic of China (1912–1949) is a working example, if you're interested. Thanks, maybe one day I'll learn the code. CMD (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- No problem! TDL (talk) 22:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Appears they are. Republic of China (1912–1949) is a working example, if you're interested. Thanks, maybe one day I'll learn the code. CMD (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)