Revision as of 07:56, 9 July 2012 editPolisher of Cobwebs (talk | contribs)29,147 editsm Reverted 1 edit by RJR3333 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Fat&Happy. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:30, 29 August 2012 edit undoJim1138 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers297,704 edits →Issue of Kerry's decision to dispute the win being in the lead: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --] (]) 01:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC) | ''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --] (]) 01:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Issue of Kerry's decision to dispute the win being in the lead == | |||
Should this text be in the second paragraph: {{quote|The winner was not determined until the following day, when Kerry decided not to dispute Bush's win in the state of ]. The state held enough electoral votes to determine the winner of the presidency. Both Kerry and ] Chairman ] have stated their opinion that voting in Ohio did not proceed fairly and that, had it done so, the Democratic ticket might have won that state and therefore the election.<nowiki><ref name=RS>{{cite news|url= http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0601-34.htm |title=Was the 2004 Election Stolen? : Rolling Stone |publisher=Rollingstone.com |author=Kennedy, Robert F.|accessdate=November 3, 2008}}</ref></nowiki> }} | |||
It would seem to be rather notable as it may have determined the outcome of the election. ] (]) 08:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:30, 29 August 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2004 United States presidential election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
2004 United States presidential election is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||
|
United States: Presidential elections Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Template:U.S. presidential election, yyyy project page link
Archives | ||||||
Index
|
||||||
Dick Gephardt
I changed the description of Dick Gephardt in the caption under his picture from former minority leader to former majority leader because even though he was more recently a minority leader, majority leader is a higher position. Soxrock24 (talk) 04:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Ohio court disclosures
Is this a credible source? If so, it seems the article needs to be updated to cite this source: New Court Filing Reveals How the 2004 Ohio Presidential Election Was Hacked. WilliamKF (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Bad data in table of popular vote counts by state
It seems that the data in the by-state tally is incorrect.
The button for the link: http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2004/federalelections2004.pdf states: "Note also: Official Federal Election Commission Report, with the latest, most final, and complete vote totals available."
For Arkansas, the table lists 573,182 votes for Bush, but the FEC report (p.27) at the link I mention lists 572,898 votes for Bush. There are discrepancies for Illinois also.
Is there an explanation for these apparent errors?
Thanks.CountMacula (talk) 02:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Al Sharpton by David Shankbone.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Al Sharpton by David Shankbone.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Misplaced Pages. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Al Sharpton by David Shankbone.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:46, 24 February 2012 (UTC) |
Issue of Kerry's decision to dispute the win being in the lead
Should this text be in the second paragraph:
The winner was not determined until the following day, when Kerry decided not to dispute Bush's win in the state of Ohio. The state held enough electoral votes to determine the winner of the presidency. Both Kerry and Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean have stated their opinion that voting in Ohio did not proceed fairly and that, had it done so, the Democratic ticket might have won that state and therefore the election.<ref name=RS>{{cite news|url= http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0601-34.htm |title=Was the 2004 Election Stolen? : Rolling Stone |publisher=Rollingstone.com |author=Kennedy, Robert F.|accessdate=November 3, 2008}}</ref>
It would seem to be rather notable as it may have determined the outcome of the election. Jim1138 (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Categories:- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Unknown-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States articles