| Revision as of 16:56, 1 May 2006 editRavenswing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,937 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:02, 1 May 2006 edit undoThe Moose (talk | contribs)Administrators13,908 edits →[]: DeleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| '''Delete''' - seems inherently POV. Most of the content looks like original research as well. ] 15:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | '''Delete''' - seems inherently POV. Most of the content looks like original research as well. ] 15:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom unless it's brought to NPOV and ''seriously'' sourced. This also might not be a useful stand-alone article, as opposed to merging it into a general Indian Economics/Business article. ] 16:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom unless it's brought to NPOV and ''seriously'' sourced. This also might not be a useful stand-alone article, as opposed to merging it into a general Indian Economics/Business article. ] 16:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. A soapbox-like rail against India, highly unlikely to become a legit article. ]]] 21:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:02, 1 May 2006
Corruption in India
Delete - seems inherently POV. Most of the content looks like original research as well. Wickethewok 15:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom unless it's brought to NPOV and seriously sourced. This also might not be a useful stand-alone article, as opposed to merging it into a general Indian Economics/Business article. RGTraynor 16:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. A soapbox-like rail against India, highly unlikely to become a legit article. Grandmasterka 21:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)