Misplaced Pages

User talk:DCAnderson: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:16, 28 April 2006 editSkeenaR (talk | contribs)1,740 edits →9/11 conspiracy theories← Previous edit Revision as of 21:08, 1 May 2006 edit undoMorton devonshire (talk | contribs)6,576 edits →9/11 conspiracy theoriesNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:


Are you for real DC? ] 23:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC) Are you for real DC? ] 23:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

I grok you in complete fulfillment. ] 21:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:08, 1 May 2006

Welcome!

Hello, DCAnderson, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Grandmasterka 04:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

9/11 conspiracy theories

I liked your changes, and I hope we can add them back in gradually. Everything at Misplaced Pages takes forever; no page is ever done. SkeenaR is a decent guy who I usually disagree with, but he's more open to reason than many. I can't think of any more platitudes right now. Tom Harrison 02:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

DC, you put "other than al-qaeda orchestrated the attacks". There are people who believe that the government knew what al-quaeda was up to and let it happen on purpose to justify this war or that policy. That is a conspiracy theory. It is too broad to say that all the alternative theories to what is presented in the official explanation involve someone other than al-quaeda orchestrating the attacks. Just so you know, I didn't make that change just so I could revert one of your edits, please don't think that. But I did disagree with the content. SkeenaR 00:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

BTW, I'm not going to pretend to know what actually happened. It seems to me that the official explanation is a conspiracy theory just like the rest of them, inconsistincies and all, only easier for most to swallow. SkeenaR 02:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Your removal of unsorced OR material (with amusing edit summaries): May I recommend just commenting out the material for now so if sources are found it can be more easily put back in? JoshuaZ 05:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Are you for real DC? SkeenaR 23:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

I grok you in complete fulfillment. Morton devonshire 21:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)