| Revision as of 21:02, 1 May 2006 editThe Moose (talk | contribs)Administrators13,908 edits →[]: Delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:15, 1 May 2006 edit undoGRBerry (talk | contribs)16,708 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom unless it's brought to NPOV and ''seriously'' sourced. This also might not be a useful stand-alone article, as opposed to merging it into a general Indian Economics/Business article. ] 16:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom unless it's brought to NPOV and ''seriously'' sourced. This also might not be a useful stand-alone article, as opposed to merging it into a general Indian Economics/Business article. ] 16:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. A soapbox-like rail against India, highly unlikely to become a legit article. ]]] 21:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. A soapbox-like rail against India, highly unlikely to become a legit article. ]]] 21:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep for now''' article has been in existance less than 24 hours. Initial author has made edits to attempt to improve. It is too early to judge that deletion is needed. I think sourcing is the most important change. | |||
Revision as of 21:15, 1 May 2006
Corruption in India
Delete - seems inherently POV. Most of the content looks like original research as well. Wickethewok 15:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom unless it's brought to NPOV and seriously sourced. This also might not be a useful stand-alone article, as opposed to merging it into a general Indian Economics/Business article. RGTraynor 16:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. A soapbox-like rail against India, highly unlikely to become a legit article. Grandmasterka 21:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep for now article has been in existance less than 24 hours. Initial author has made edits to attempt to improve. It is too early to judge that deletion is needed. I think sourcing is the most important change.