Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Religious rivalry in Glasgow: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:12, 1 May 2006 editYamaguchi先生 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators113,634 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 01:45, 2 May 2006 edit undoAngusmclellan (talk | contribs)64,067 edits []Next edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
**I'm certain it could conform to WP:V, because it is an often-noted thing in Scotland (yes, it's just me saying this.) The lack of sources is a flaw in the article, but taking the article away because of that flaw would, in this case, be a Bad Thing. ] 15:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC) **I'm certain it could conform to WP:V, because it is an often-noted thing in Scotland (yes, it's just me saying this.) The lack of sources is a flaw in the article, but taking the article away because of that flaw would, in this case, be a Bad Thing. ] 15:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as this is a ] nomination. ] 18:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' as this is a ] nomination. ] 18:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' ] can be addressed (and by the nom if willing, there is most certainly published material on this) but ] is telling. ] ] 01:45, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:45, 2 May 2006

Religious rivalry in Glasgow

The article is original research WP:OR and does not contain verified material WP:V refers, both are official Misplaced Pages policies TheMadTim 00:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

No, he means that this very nomination is an instance of WP:POINT, not that this article's creation was an instance thereof. Kimchi.sg 04:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I misunderstood, and am voting to keep. Darquis 06:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Just so that you know dude, WP:POINT is being used by Alibabs without basis. Alibabs has in fact been conducting a campaign of harassment against myself for a couple of days now. Ask them to explain exactly how ] applies. They can't. --TheMadTim 12:57, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I am voting to keep the article as you nominating the article is an attempt to make a WP:POINT. KarateKid7 03:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Err, are you able to cite any evidence of this dude? --TheMadTim 03:07, 1 May 2006 (UTC)