| Revision as of 03:18, 2 May 2006 editTheMadTim (talk | contribs)243 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:18, 2 May 2006 edit undoTheMadTim (talk | contribs)243 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| *'''Strong Delete''' per nom. Someone ought to flag down the editor with ]. ] 16:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | *'''Strong Delete''' per nom. Someone ought to flag down the editor with ]. ] 16:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Delete''' per nom. ] 23:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | *'''Strong Delete''' per nom. ] 23:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * |
*'''Keep''' (I don't buy into all that 'strong' and 'weak' keep and delete crap.) Once again, deletion is the route taken without giving the main contributor a chance to bring the article up to an acceptable standard.--] 03:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:18, 2 May 2006
Political change
Delete - An opinion piece for the most part frought with original research. Wickethewok 15:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete per nom. Someone ought to flag down the editor with WP:NOT. RGTraynor 16:52, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete per nom. Hornplease 23:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep (I don't buy into all that 'strong' and 'weak' keep and delete crap.) Once again, deletion is the route taken without giving the main contributor a chance to bring the article up to an acceptable standard.--TheMadTim 03:18, 2 May 2006 (UTC)