Misplaced Pages

Senkaku Islands: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:57, 17 September 2012 view sourceLiu.spain (talk | contribs)108 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 16:02, 17 September 2012 view source Liu.spain (talk | contribs)108 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 57: Line 57:
}} }}


The '''Diaoyu Islands (Senkaku Islands)''' ({{zh|s={{linktext|钓鱼|岛|列岛}}|p= Diàoyúdǎo jí qí fùshǔ dǎoyǔ}}; also simply 钓鱼岛|p= Diàoyúdǎo) in Mainland China, also known as the '''Senkaku Islands''' {{Nihongo|Senkaku Islands|{{linktext|尖|閣|諸|島}}in Japan or '''Tiaoyutai Islands''' ({{zh|t={{linktext|釣魚|台|列|嶼}}|p=Diàoyútái liè yǔ}}) in Taiwan (Republic of China),<ref name="TWcouncilor"> {{cite web | url = http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20120708000063&cid=1101&MainCatID=11 | title = Former New Taipei councilor explains PRC flag controversy | accessdate = 21 July 2012 | author = WantChinaTimes.com | date = 8 July 2012 | work = WantChinaTimes.com}}</ref>, are a group of ] in the ]. They are located roughly due east of ], northeast of ], west of ], and north of the southwestern end of the ]. The '''Diaoyu Islands (Senkaku Islands)''' ({{zh|s={{linktext|钓鱼|岛}}|p= Diàoyúdǎo}}; in Mainland China, also known as the '''Senkaku Islands''' {{Nihongo|{{linktext|尖|閣|諸|島}}in Japan or '''Tiaoyutai Islands''' ({{zh|t={{linktext|釣魚|台|列|嶼}}|p=Diàoyútái liè yǔ}}) in Taiwan (Republic of China),<ref name="TWcouncilor"> {{cite web | url = http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20120708000063&cid=1101&MainCatID=11 | title = Former New Taipei councilor explains PRC flag controversy | accessdate = 21 July 2012 | author = WantChinaTimes.com | date = 8 July 2012 | work = WantChinaTimes.com}}</ref>, are a group of ] in the ]. They are located roughly due east of ], northeast of ], west of ], and north of the southwestern end of the ].


China claims that the Chinese discovered, explored and gained the control over the islands since 14th century (late Ming dynasty). The Chinese fishermen began to sail around the islands afterwards. Ancient Chinese books, such as "Geng Lu Bo" ({{zh|s={{linktext|更路簿}}| and "Shunfeng Xiangsong"({{zh|s={{linktext|顺风相送}}|, has officially documented Chinese activities around the Diaoyu islands since that time. Through the five centuries afterwards, Chinese has maintained a civil and military presence and retained the sailing rights over the islands. China claims that the Chinese discovered, explored and gained the control over the islands since 14th century (late Ming dynasty). The Chinese fishermen began to sail around the islands afterwards. Ancient Chinese books, such as "Geng Lu Bo" ({{zh|s={{linktext|更路簿}}| and "Voyage with a Tail Wind"({{zh|t=順風相送|s=顺风相送|p=Shùnfēng Xiāngsòng}}), has officially documented Chinese activities around the Diaoyu islands since that time. Through the five centuries afterwards, Chinese has maintained a civil and military presence and retained the sailing rights over the islands.


However, Ryukyu Kingdom was considered tributary lands controlled by the Chinese government during the Ming and Qing dynasties. The Diaoyu Islands were considered to be the crucial access to the Ryukyu Kingdom from Chinese mainland. The claims were writen in the book "Missionary to the Ryukyu"{{zh|s={{linktext|使琉球录}}|. In ancient times, the Diaoyu Islands have been controlled by the hinese government. However, Ryukyu Kingdom was considered tributary lands controlled by the Chinese government during the Ming and Qing dynasties. The Diaoyu Islands were considered to be the crucial access to the Ryukyu Kingdom from Chinese mainland. The claims were writen in the book "Record of the Imperial Envoy's Visit to Ryūkyū"({{zh|t=使琉球錄|s=使琉球录|p=Shĭ Liúqiú Lù}}). In ancient times, the Diaoyu Islands have been controlled by the hinese government.


In 1894, the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 bursted out. Japan, in victory, reclaimed that the Diaoyu Islands were uninhabited islands and then included them into the Japanese territory by the endorsement of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, signed between China and Japan. In 1894, the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 bursted out. Japan, in victory, reclaimed that the Diaoyu Islands were uninhabited islands and then included them into the Japanese territory by the endorsement of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, signed between China and Japan.
Line 72: Line 72:


==History== ==History==

===Early history=== ===Early history===
Records of these islands date back to as early as the 15th century. They were referred as ''Diaoyu'' in books such as ''Voyage with a Tail Wind'' ({{zh|t=順風相送|s=顺风相送|p=Shùnfēng Xiāngsòng}}) (1403) <ref>Title: Liang zhong hai dao zhen jing / .Imprint: Beijing : Zhonghua shu ju : Xin hua shu dian Beijing fa xing suo fa xing, 2000 reprint edition. Contents: Shun feng xiang song--Zhi nan zheng fa. (順風相送--指南正法). ISBN ISBN 7-101-02025-9. pp96 and . The full text is available on .</ref> and ''Record of the Imperial Envoy's Visit to Ryūkyū'' ({{zh|t=使琉球錄|s=使琉球录|p=Shĭ Liúqiú Lù}}) (1534). Adopted by the Chinese Imperial Map of the Ming Dynasty, the Chinese name for the island group (]) and the Japanese name for the main island (]) both mean "]". Records of these islands date back to as early as the 15th century. They were referred as ''Diaoyu'' in books such as ''Voyage with a Tail Wind'' ({{zh|t=順風相送|s=顺风相送|p=Shùnfēng Xiāngsòng}}) (1403) <ref>Title: Liang zhong hai dao zhen jing / .Imprint: Beijing : Zhonghua shu ju : Xin hua shu dian Beijing fa xing suo fa xing, 2000 reprint edition. Contents: Shun feng xiang song--Zhi nan zheng fa. (順風相送--指南正法). ISBN ISBN 7-101-02025-9. pp96 and . The full text is available on .</ref> and ''Record of the Imperial Envoy's Visit to Ryūkyū'' ({{zh|t=使琉球錄|s=使琉球录|p=Shĭ Liúqiú Lù}}) (1534). Adopted by the Chinese Imperial Map of the Ming Dynasty, the Chinese name for the island group (]) and the Japanese name for the main island (]) both mean "]".

Revision as of 16:02, 17 September 2012

"Diaoyutai" redirects here. For the Chinese state guesthouse, see Diaoyutai State Guesthouse.

Diaoyu Islands
Other names
Template:Lang-ja (Senkaku)
Chinese: 釣魚台列嶼 (Diaoyutai/Tiaoyutai)
or 钓鱼岛列岛 (Diaoyu/Tiaoyu)
Pinnacle Islands
Geography
LocationPacific Ocean
Coordinates25°44′41.49″N 123°28′29.79″E / 25.7448583°N 123.4749417°E / 25.7448583; 123.4749417
Administration
China

The Diaoyu Islands (Senkaku Islands) (Chinese: 钓鱼; pinyin: Diàoyúdǎo; in Mainland China, also known as the Senkaku Islands {{Nihongo|島in Japan or Tiaoyutai Islands (Chinese: 釣魚; pinyin: Diàoyútái liè yǔ) in Taiwan (Republic of China),, are a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea. They are located roughly due east of Mainland China, northeast of Taiwan, west of Okinawa Island, and north of the southwestern end of the Ryukyu Islands.

China claims that the Chinese discovered, explored and gained the control over the islands since 14th century (late Ming dynasty). The Chinese fishermen began to sail around the islands afterwards. Ancient Chinese books, such as "Geng Lu Bo" ({{zh|s=更路簿| and "Voyage with a Tail Wind"(simplified Chinese: 顺风相送; traditional Chinese: 順風相送; pinyin: Shùnfēng Xiāngsòng), has officially documented Chinese activities around the Diaoyu islands since that time. Through the five centuries afterwards, Chinese has maintained a civil and military presence and retained the sailing rights over the islands.

However, Ryukyu Kingdom was considered tributary lands controlled by the Chinese government during the Ming and Qing dynasties. The Diaoyu Islands were considered to be the crucial access to the Ryukyu Kingdom from Chinese mainland. The claims were writen in the book "Record of the Imperial Envoy's Visit to Ryūkyū"(simplified Chinese: 使琉球录; traditional Chinese: 使琉球錄; pinyin: Shĭ Liúqiú Lù). In ancient times, the Diaoyu Islands have been controlled by the hinese government.

In 1894, the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 bursted out. Japan, in victory, reclaimed that the Diaoyu Islands were uninhabited islands and then included them into the Japanese territory by the endorsement of the Treaty of Shimonoseki, signed between China and Japan.

After the World War II, Japan surrendered and saw its territory be reshaped by the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration. China has legally retrieved the Diaoyu Islands. However, In September 8, 1961, Japan privately signed the Okinawa Reversion Treaty with the government of the United States. The islands reverted to Japanese control under the Okinawa Reversion Treaty between the United States and Japan This treaty, however, was not recognized by the government of the People's Republic of China, nor by that of Republic of China.

Japan controlled the islands from 1895 until its surrender at the end of World War II. The United States administered them as part of the United States Civil Administration of the Ryukyu Islands from 1945 until 1972, when the islands reverted to Japanese control under the Okinawa Reversion Treaty between the United States and Japan.

The islands are an issue in foreign relations between Japan and the PRC and between Japan and the ROC. Despite the complexity of relations between the PRC and ROC, both governments agree that the islands are part of Taiwan as part of Toucheng Township in Yilan County of their respective divisions. Japan does not officially recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, and regards the islands as a part of Ishigaki, Okinawa Prefecture and acknowledges neither the claims of the PRC nor ROC to the islands. The Japanese government has not allowed Ishigaki to develop the islands.

History

Early history

Records of these islands date back to as early as the 15th century. They were referred as Diaoyu in books such as Voyage with a Tail Wind (simplified Chinese: 顺风相送; traditional Chinese: 順風相送; pinyin: Shùnfēng Xiāngsòng) (1403) and Record of the Imperial Envoy's Visit to Ryūkyū (simplified Chinese: 使琉球录; traditional Chinese: 使琉球錄; pinyin: Shĭ Liúqiú Lù) (1534). Adopted by the Chinese Imperial Map of the Ming Dynasty, the Chinese name for the island group (Diaoyu) and the Japanese name for the main island (Uotsuri) both mean "fishing".

The first published description of the islands in Europe was in a book imported by Isaac Titsingh in 1796. His small library of Japanese books included Sangoku Tsūran Zusetsu (三国通覧図説, An Illustrated Description of Three Countries) by Hayashi Shihei. This text, which was published in Japan in 1785, described the Ryūkyū Kingdom. In 1832, the Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland supported the posthumous abridged publication of Titsingh's French translation.

The first reference to the islands in a book published in English was Edward Belcher's 1848 account of the voyages of HMS Sammarang. Captain Belcher observed that "the names assigned in this region have been too hastily admitted." Belcher reported anchoring off Pinnacle Island in March 1845.

In 1870s and 1880s, the English name Pinnacle Islands was used by the British navy for the rocks adjacent to the largest island Uotsuri-jima/Diaoyu Dao (then called Hoa-pin-su, 和平屿, "Peace Island"); Kuba-jima/Huangwei Yu (then called Ti-a-usu); and Taishō-jima/Chiwei Yu. The name "Pinnacle Islands" is used by some as an English-language equivalent to "Senkaku" or "Diaoyu".

One islet of the group – Uotsuri

The collective use of the name "Senkaku" to denote the entire group began with the advent of the controversy in the 1970s.

Japanese and US control

Japanese workers at a bonito fisheries processing plant on Uotsuri-jima sometime around 1910

The Japanese central government formally annexed the islands on 14 January 1895. Around 1900, Japanese entrepreneur Koga Tatsushirō (古賀 辰四郎) constructed a bonito processing plant on the islands with 200 workers. The business failed in 1940 and the islands have remained deserted ever since. In the 1970s, Koga Tatsushirō's descendents Zenji and Hanako Tatsushirō sold four islets to the Kurihara family of Saitama Prefecture. Kunioki Kurihara owned Uotsuri, Kita-Kojima, and Minami-Kojima. Kunioki's sister owns Kuba.

The islands came under US government occupation in 1945 after the surrender of Japan ended World War II. In 1969, the United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (ECAFE) identified potential oil and gas reserves in the vicinity of the Senkaku Islands. In 1971, the Okinawa Reversion Treaty passed the U.S. Senate, returning the islands to Japanese control in 1972. Also in 1972, the Taiwanese and Chinese governments officially began to declare ownership of the islands.

Since the islands reverted to Japanese government control in 1972, the mayor of Ishigaki has been given civic authority over the territory. The Japanese central government, however, has prohibited Ishigaki from surveying or developing the islands. In 1979 an official delegation from the Japanese government composed of 50 academics, government officials from the Foreign and Transport ministries, officials from the now-defunct Okinawa Development Agency, and Hiroyuki Kurihara, visited the islands and camped on Uotsuri for about four weeks. The delegation surveyed the local ecosystem, finding moles and sheep, studied the local marine life, and examined whether the islands would support human habitation.

From 2002 to 2012, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications paid the Kurihara family ¥25 million a year to rent Uotsuri, Minami-Kojima and Kita-Kojima. Japan's Ministry of Defense rents Kuba island for an undisclosed amount. Kuba is used by the U.S. military as a practice aircraft bombing range. Japan's central government completely owns Taisho island.

On 17 December 2010, Ishigaki declared January 14 as "Pioneering Day" to commemorate Japan's 1895 annexation of the Senkaku Islands. China condemned Ishigaki's actions. In 2012, both the Tokyo Metropolitan and Japanese central governments announced plans to negotiate purchase of Uotsuri, Kita-Kojima, and Minami-Kojima from the Kurihara family.

On 11 September 2012, the Japanese government nationalized its control over Minamikojima, Kitakojima, and Uotsuri islands by purchasing them from the Kurihara family for ¥2.05 billion. China's Foreign Ministry objected saying Beijing would not "sit back and watch its territorial sovereignty violated."

Geography

A cluster of islets – Uotsuri-jima (left), Kita-Kojima and Minami-Kojima (right)

The island group consists of five uninhabited islets and three barren rocks.

These minor features in the East China Sea are located approximately 120 nautical miles northeast of Taiwan, 200 nautical miles east of the Chinese mainland and 200 nautical miles southwest of the Japanese island of Okinawa.

In ascending order of distances, the island cluster is located:

Islands in the group
No. Japanese name Chinese name Coordinates Area (km) Highest elevation (m)
1 Uotsuri-jima (魚釣島) Diaoyu Dao (釣魚島) 25°46′N 123°31′E / 25.767°N 123.517°E / 25.767; 123.517 4.32 383
2 Taishō-jima (大正島) Chiwei Yu (赤尾嶼) 25°55′N 124°34′E / 25.917°N 124.567°E / 25.917; 124.567 0.0609 75
3 Kuba-jima (久場島) Huangwei Yu (黃尾嶼) 25°56′N 123°41′E / 25.933°N 123.683°E / 25.933; 123.683 1.08 117
4 Kita-Ko-jima (北小島) Bei Xiaodao(北小島) 25°45′N 123°36′E / 25.750°N 123.600°E / 25.750; 123.600 0.3267 135
5 Minami-Ko-jima (南小島) Nan Xiaodao(南小島) 25°45′N 123°36′E / 25.750°N 123.600°E / 25.750; 123.600 0.4592 149
6 Oki-no-Kita-iwa (沖ノ北岩) Da Bei Xiaodao( Error: {{Lang}}: invalid parameter: |3= (help)/北岩) 25°49′N 123°36′E / 25.817°N 123.600°E / 25.817; 123.600 0.0183 nominal
7 Oki-no-Minami-iwa (沖ノ南岩) Da Nan Xiaodao (大南小島/南岩) 25°47′N 123°37′E / 25.783°N 123.617°E / 25.783; 123.617 0.0048 nominal
8 Tobise (飛瀬) Fei Jiao Yan (飛礁岩/飛岩) 25°45′N 123°33′E / 25.750°N 123.550°E / 25.750; 123.550 0.0008 nominal

The depth of the surrounding waters of the continental shelf is approximately 100–150 metres (328–492 ft) except for the Okinawa Trough on the south.

The existence of the back-arc basin complicates descriptive issues. According to Professor Ji Guoxing of the Asia-Pacific Department at Shanghai Institute for International Studies,

The Okinawa trough in context of back-arc basins of the world.
  • China's interpretation of the geography is that

    "...the Okinawa Trough proves that the continental shelves of China and Japan are not connected, that the Trough serves as the boundary between them, and that the Trough should not be ignored ...."

  • Japan's interpretation of the geography is that

    "...the trough is just an incidental depression in a continuous continental margin between the two countries ... the trough should be ignored ...."

Flora and fauna

Permission for collecting herbs on three of the islands was recorded in an Imperial Chinese edict of 1893.

Uotsuri Jima, the largest island, has a number of endemic species such as the Senkaku Mole (Mogera uchidai) and Okinawa-kuro-oo-ari ant. The Senkaku mole is an endangered species; and its existence is threatened by domestic goats which were introduced to the island in 1978.

Albatross are observed in the islands. Amongst all islands, Minami Kojima is one of the few breeding places of the rare Short-tailed Albatross (Phoebastria albatrus).

Sovereignty dispute

Two of the disputed islets – Kita-Kojima (left) and Minami-Kojima (right)
Main article: Senkaku Islands dispute

Territorial sovereignty over the islands and the maritime boundaries around them are disputed between the People's Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan), and Japan.

The People's Republic and Taiwan claim that the islands have been a part of Chinese territory since at least 1534. They acknowledge that Japan took control of the islands in 1894–1895 during the first Sino-Japanese War, through the signature of the Treaty of Shimonoseki. They assert that the Potsdam Declaration (which Japan accepted as part of the San Francisco Peace Treaty) required that Japan relinquish control of all islands except for "the islands of Honshū, Hokkaidō, Kyūshū, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine", and they state that this means control of the islands should pass to China.

Japan does not accept that there is a dispute, asserting that the islands are an integral part of Japan. Japan has rejected claims that the islands were under China's control prior to 1895, and that these islands were contemplated by the Potsdam Declaration or affected by the San Francisco Peace Treaty.

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ WantChinaTimes.com (July 8, 2012). "Former New Taipei councilor explains PRC flag controversy". WantChinaTimes.com. Retrieved July 21, 2012.
  2. Lee, Seokwoo. (2002). Territorial Disputes Among Japan, China and Taiwan Concerning the Senkaku Islands, pp. 10–13., p. 10, at Google Books
  3. McDorman, Ted L. (2005). "Central Pacific and East Asian Maritime Boundaries" in International Maritime Boundaries, Vol. 5, pp. 3441., p. 3441, at Google Books
  4. Title: Liang zhong hai dao zhen jing / .Imprint: Beijing : Zhonghua shu ju : Xin hua shu dian Beijing fa xing suo fa xing, 2000 reprint edition. Contents: Shun feng xiang song--Zhi nan zheng fa. (順風相送--指南正法). ISBN ISBN 7-101-02025-9. pp96 and pp253. The full text is available on wikisource.
  5. WorldCat, Sangoku Tsūran Zusetsu; alternate romaji Sankoku Tsūran Zusetsu
  6. Cullen, Louis M. (2003). A History of Japan, 1582–1941: Internal and External Worlds, p. 137., p. 137, at Google Books
  7. Klaproth, Julius. (1832). San kokf tsou ran to sets, ou Aperçu général des trois royaumes, pp. 169–180., p. i, at Google Books
  8. Suganuma, Unryu. (2001). Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations, at Google Books
  9. Belcher, Edward. (1848). Narrative of the Voyage of H.M.S. Samarang, Vol. I, pp. 315., p. 315, at Google Books; Belcher, Vol. II, pp. 572–574., p. 572, at Google Books.
  10. Belcher, Vol. I, at Google Books; excerpt at p. 317, "On the 16th, we endeavoured to obtain observations on Tia-usu; a landing was effected, but the absence of sun prevented our obtaining satisfactory observations, and bad weather coming on hastened our departure. This group, comprehending Hoa-pin-san (和平山,"Peace Island", Uotsuri-jima), Pinnacle Rocks, and Tias-usu (Kuba-kima), form a triangle, of which the hypothenuse, or distance between Hoa-pin-san and Tia-usu, extends about fourteen miles, and that between Hoa-pinsan and the Southern Pinnacle, about two miles."
  11. Suganuma, p. 90., p. 90, at Google Books; Jarrad, Frederick W. (1873). The China Sea Directory, Vol. IV, pp. 141–142., p. 141, at Google Books
  12. Hagström, Linus. (2005). Japan's China Policy: A Relational Power Analysis, , p. 1, at Google Books
  13. Koo, Min Gyo (2009). Disputes and Maritime Regime Building in East Asia, p. 103 n2. citing Park (1973) "Oil under Troubled Waters: The Northeast Asia Seabed Controversy," 14 HILJ (Harvard International Law Journal) 212, 248–249; also Park, Choon-Ho. (1972)Continental Shelf Issues in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. Kingston, Rhode Island: Law of the Sea Institute, pp. 1–64.
  14. ^ Kaneko, Maya, (Kyodo News) "Ishigaki fishermen fret over Senkaku encroachment", Japan Times, December 8, 2010, p. 3.
  15. "BBC News - Japan confirms disputed islands purchase plan". bbc.co.uk. 2012 . Retrieved 10 September 2012. Kunioki Kurihara {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  16. Ito, Masami, "Owner OK with metro bid to buy disputed Senkaku Islands", Japan Times, 18 May 2012, pp. 1-2
  17. "Senkaku/Diaoyutai Islands". Globalsecurity.org.
  18. Finney, John W. "Senate Endorses Okinawa Treaty; Votes 84 to 6 for Island's Return to Japan," New York Times. November 11, 1971.
  19. Kyodo News, "Senkaku purchase bid made official", Japan Times, 11 September 2012, p. 2
  20. Ito, Masami, "Jurisdiction over remote Senkakus comes with hot-button dangers", Japan Times, 18 May 2012, p. 1
  21. Ito, Masami, "Owner OK with metro bid to buy disputed Senkaku Islands", Japan Times, 18 May 2012, pp. 1-2
  22. Hongo, Jun, "Tokyo's intentions for Senkaku islets", Japan Times, 19 April 2012, p. 2.
  23. Ito, Masami, "Owner OK with metro bid to buy disputed Senkaku Islands", Japan Times, 18 May 2012, pp. 1-2
  24. Agence France-Presse, "Senkaku memorial day riles China", Japan Times, December 19, 2010, p. 1. Retrieved January 29, 2011.
  25. Ito, Masami, "Owner OK with metro bid to buy disputed Senkaku Islands", Japan Times, 18 May 2012, pp. 1-2
  26. NHK World, "Senkaku Isles Nationalized", 11 September 2012
  27. Kyodo News, "Senkaku purchase bid made official", Japan Times, 11 September 2012, p. 2
  28. "Japan says it will purchase disputed islands from private owner, angering China". Washington Post. AP. September 10, 2012. Retrieved September 10, 2012.
  29. UC Berkeley: UC Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation; retrieved November 15, 2010.
  30. Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrals (ACAP), Breeding site details: Agincourt/P'eng-chia-Hsu
  31. Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI), 魚釣島 (Uotsuri Jima).
  32. GSI, 大正島 (Taishō Jima).
  33. GSI, 久場島 (Kuba Jima).
  34. Google Maps, 北小島 (Kita Kojima); GSI, 北小島 (Kita Kojima).
  35. Google Maps, 南小島 (Minami Kojima)
  36. GSI, 沖ノ北岩 (Okino Kitaiwa).
  37. GSI, 沖ノ南岩 (Okino Minami-iwa).
  38. GSI, 飛瀬 (Tobise).
  39. Ji, Guoxing. (1995). "Maritime Jurisdiction in the Three China Seas," p. 11; Sibuet, Jean-Claude et al. "Back arc extension in the Okinawa Trough," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 92, Issue B13, p. 14041-14063.
  40. ^ Ji, p. 11.
  41. Ji, p. 11; excerpt, "In 1893, Empress Dowager Tsu Shih of the Qing Dynasty issued an imperial edict .... China argues that discovery accompanied by some formal act of usage is sufficient to establish sovereignty over the islands."
  42. Zoological Society of London, EDGE (Evolutionary Distinct & Globally Endangered) Senkaku mole, 2006; retrieved November 15, 2010.
  43. Porcasi, Judith F. (1999). "Prehistoric Exploitation of Albatross on the Southern California Channel Islands," Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology. Vol. 21 (1), pp. 109, citing Hasegawa, Hiroshi. (1979). "Status of the Short-tailed Albatross of Torishimia and in the Senkaku Retto in 1978/79. Pacific Seabird Group Bulletin 6:23–25; and Hasegawa, Hiroshi and Anthony R. Degange. (1982). "The Short-tailed Albatross, 'Diamedea albatrus, Its Status, Distribution and Natural History." American Birds, 36(5):806–814.
  44. Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea (NILOS). (2000). International Organizations and the Law of the Sea, p. 108., p. 108, at Google Books
  45. Ji, pp. 11–12, 19.

References

  • Belcher, Edward and Arthur Adams. (1848). Narrative of the Voyage of H.M.S. Samarang, During the Years 1843–46: Employed Surveying the Islands of the Eastern Archipelago. London : Reeve, Benham, and Reeve. OCLC 192154
  • Charney, Jonathan I., David A. Colson, Robert W. Smith. (2005). International Maritime Boundaries, 5 vols. Hotei Publishing: Leiden. 10-ISBN 0792311876/13-ISBN 9780792311874; 10-ISBN 904111954X/13-ISBN 9789041119544; 10-ISBN 9041103457/13-ISBN 9789041103451; 10-ISBN 9004144617/13-ISBN 9789004144613; 10-ISBN 900414479X/13-ISBN 9789004144798; OCLC 23254092
  • Findlay, Alexander George. (1889). A Directory for the Navigation of the Indian Archipelago and the Coast of China. London: R. H. Laurie. OCLC 55548028
  • Hagström, Linus. (2005). Japan's China Policy: A Relational Power Analysis. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-34679-5; OCLC 475020946
  • Inoue, Kiyoshi. (1972) Senkaku Letto /Diaoyu Islands The Historical Treatise. Kyoto: Daisan Publisher (出版社: 第三書館) (1996/10)「尖閣」列島―釣魚諸島の史的解明 [単行本]. ISBN 978-4-8074-9612-9; also hosted in here for online reading (set to Shift-JIS character code), with English synopsis here. Chinese translation by Ying Hui, Published by Commercial Press Hong Kong (1973) 釣魚列島的歷史和主權問題 / 井上清著 ; 英慧譯, ISBN 9622574734.
  • Jarrad, Frederick W. (1873). The China Sea Directory, Vol. IV. Comprising the Coasts of Korea, Russian Tartary, the Japan Islands, Gulfs of Tartary and Amúr, and the Sea of Okhotsk. London: Hydrographic Office, Admiralty. OCLC 557221949
  • Lee, Seokwoo, Shelagh Furness and Clive Schofield. (2002). Territorial disputes among Japan, China and Taiwan concerning the Senkaku Islands. Durham: University of Durham, International Boundaries Research Unit (IBRU). ISBN 978-1-897643-50-1; OCLC 249501645
  • Suganuma, Unryu. (2000). Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in Sino-Japanese Relations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-2159-3; OCLC 170955369
  • Valencia, Mark J. (2001). Maritime Regime Building: Lessons Learned and Their Relevance for Northeast Asia. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 10-ISBN 9041115803/13-ISBN 9789041115805; OCLC 174100966

Further reading

External links

Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia
LandIslands and waters
  • 1: Divided among multiple claimants
Categories: