Misplaced Pages

Redshift quantization: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:56, 3 May 2006 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,451 edits NPOVing intro← Previous edit Revision as of 11:58, 3 May 2006 edit undoජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,451 edits not all these studies were independent.Next edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
:"The work has developed within three broad categories, beginning with, (1), correlations between the redshift and intrinsic properties of galaxies. These studies quickly led to the discovery of apparent redshift quantization which provides the second type of test. (2) Is the redshift a discrete or continuous quantity? The need for high precision and a thorough understanding of uncertainties led more recently to the detection of apparent redshift variability which provides a third form of testing. (3) Is the redshift rapidly variable? Throughout the development of the program it has seemed increasingly clear that the redshift has properties inconsistent with a simple velocity and/or cosmic scale change interpretation. Various implications have been pointed out from time to time, but basically the work is observationally driven." <ref>Tifft, W. G., "", Astrophysics and Space Science, v. 227, p. 25-39, 1995</ref> :"The work has developed within three broad categories, beginning with, (1), correlations between the redshift and intrinsic properties of galaxies. These studies quickly led to the discovery of apparent redshift quantization which provides the second type of test. (2) Is the redshift a discrete or continuous quantity? The need for high precision and a thorough understanding of uncertainties led more recently to the detection of apparent redshift variability which provides a third form of testing. (3) Is the redshift rapidly variable? Throughout the development of the program it has seemed increasingly clear that the redshift has properties inconsistent with a simple velocity and/or cosmic scale change interpretation. Various implications have been pointed out from time to time, but basically the work is observationally driven." <ref>Tifft, W. G., "", Astrophysics and Space Science, v. 227, p. 25-39, 1995</ref>


===Subsequent work by other researchers===
===Independent studies===


In 1989, an independent study by Martin R. Croasdale, found that: In 1989, an independent study by Martin R. Croasdale, found that:
Line 30: Line 30:


==Criticism== ==Criticism==
Tifft's proposals are relatively unknown even among professionals. Of the small number of instances known where independent corroboration of the phenomenon has been attempted, there has been no evidence for quantization of redshifts. Current observations and models of ] trace ] ] and ] that cause most galaxies in a rough statistical sense to have correlated positions, but such groupings do not have the characteristics suggested by Tifft and his enthusiasts. As such with exceedingly few exceptions, modern cosmology researchers have suggested that redshift quantizations are manifestations of other phenomena, or not present at all.
Some researchers have suggested that redshift quantizations are manifestations of other phenomena, or not present at all.


In 1987, E. Sepulveda suggested that a geometric ] based on the ] could account for all redshift periodicities, and that: In 1987, E. Sepulveda suggested that a geometric ] based on the ] could account for all redshift periodicities, and that:

Revision as of 11:58, 3 May 2006

This article is under development

Redshift quantization or redshift periodicity is a proposal first made by William Tifft based on his early measurements of the redshift of galaxies, that the redshifts of galaxies tend to cluster around multiples of some particular value.. Since Hubble's Law predicts redshift as an indicator of distance, such a proposal would either indicate a quantization of distances of galaxies from Earth assuming an isotropic distribution or a problem with the redshift-distance correlation. Recent redshift surveys of quasars (QSOs) have found no evidence of quantization , and consequently most cosmologists dispute the existence of any redshift quantization.

Those who claim quantized redshift exist claim it to have implications for various standard cosmological models and alternative cosmological models. In particular, many opponents of the Big Bang from Halton Arp to creationists to geocentrists have referred to such observations as reasons to reject this standard account of the origin and evolution of the universe.

Background

"Redshift-magnitude banding correlation" as he first called it, was first investigated in the 1970s by (now Emeritus Professor of astronomy) William G. Tifft He wrote:

"Using more than 200 redshifts in Coma, Perseus, and A2199, the presence of a distinct band-related periodicity in redshifts is indicated. Finally, a new sample of accurate redshifts of bright Coma galaxies on a single band is presented, which shows a strong redshift periodicity of 220 km s. An upper limit of 20 km s is placed on the internal Doppler redshift component of motion in the Coma cluster".

In summary, Tiffts notes that:

"Redshift quantization has three main facets: 1) the internal organization of galaxies, 2) differential effects between galaxies in physical systems, 3) global effects linking all galaxies and cosmology. The subject originated as an outgrowth of redshift correlation studies including studies of internal kinematics of galaxies. While possibly central to understanding redshift quantization, this aspect is complex and largely undeveloped. The bulk of the evidence for redshift quantization comes from differential and global periodicity testing."
"The work has developed within three broad categories, beginning with, (1), correlations between the redshift and intrinsic properties of galaxies. These studies quickly led to the discovery of apparent redshift quantization which provides the second type of test. (2) Is the redshift a discrete or continuous quantity? The need for high precision and a thorough understanding of uncertainties led more recently to the detection of apparent redshift variability which provides a third form of testing. (3) Is the redshift rapidly variable? Throughout the development of the program it has seemed increasingly clear that the redshift has properties inconsistent with a simple velocity and/or cosmic scale change interpretation. Various implications have been pointed out from time to time, but basically the work is observationally driven."

Subsequent work by other researchers

In 1989, an independent study by Martin R. Croasdale, found that:

"Using new data for unassociated galaxies with wide H I profiles and values of period and solar motion predicted by Tifft and Cocke (1984), a periodicity has been found which is significant at the conventional 5 percent level. Together with Tifft's work on galaxy pairs and small groups, this result appears to provide evidence in favor of the hypothesis that measured galaxy redshifts occur in steps of a little more than 72 km/s or a simple multiple of this period."

In 1990, B. Guthrie and William Napier found mixed results:

"No such periodicity is found for the dwarf irregulars, but there is a possible periodicity of about 71.1 km/s for the bright spirals. In a further exploratory study, the sample of 112 spirals is divided up according to environment. The spirals in high-density regions of the cluster show no quantization, whereas those in low-density regions appear to be partially quantized in intervals of about 71.0 km/s."

A year later, another study of theirs found:

"A strong periodicity of about 37.2 km/s is found, against a white noise background, for an assumed solar vector coincidental, within the uncertainties, with that corresponding to the sun's probable motion around the Galactic Center. Comparison with sets of synthetic data simulating the overall characteristics of the real data show the periodicity to be present at a high confidence level. As an independent test, the sample was divided into two groups of 40 and 49 galaxies with more and less accurately determined redshifts, respectively. The measured strength of the periodicity is significantly greater for the group of 40 galaxies. The overall probability that the periodicity of 37.2 km/s arises by chance is in the range of 3 x 10 exp -6 and exp -4."

In 1992, A. Holba, et al concluded:

"The space distribution of the sample by Broadhurst et al (1990) reveals a periodicity much better than that originally found by them, if the parameters of the cosmological model used to convert redshift to distance lie in a long a fairly wide strip periodicity may have not only geometrical but physical explanations too."

Criticism

Tifft's proposals are relatively unknown even among professionals. Of the small number of instances known where independent corroboration of the phenomenon has been attempted, there has been no evidence for quantization of redshifts. Current observations and models of large-scale structure models trace filamentary superclusters and voids that cause most galaxies in a rough statistical sense to have correlated positions, but such groupings do not have the characteristics suggested by Tifft and his enthusiasts. As such with exceedingly few exceptions, modern cosmology researchers have suggested that redshift quantizations are manifestations of other phenomena, or not present at all.

In 1987, E. Sepulveda suggested that a geometric paradigm based on the polytrope theory could account for all redshift periodicities, and that:

The smallest periodicities (Δz=72, 144 km/sec) are due to parallel line segments of galactic clustering. The largest (Δz=0.15) are due to circumferential circuits around the universe. Intermediate periodicities are due to other geometric irregularities. These periodicities or apparent quantizations are relics or faithful fossils of a real quantization that occured in the primordial atom".

In 2005, Tang, Su Min, et al:

".. used the publicly available data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and 2dF QSO redshift survey to test the hypothesis that QSOs are ejected from active galaxies with periodic noncosmological redshifts. For two different intrinsic redshift models, and find there is no evidence for a periodicity at the predicted frequency in log(1+z), or at any other frequency. "

Footnotes

  1. Tang, Su Min; Zhang, Shuang Nan, "Critical Examinations of QSO Redshift Periodicities and Associations with Galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data", in The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 633, Issue 1, pp. 41-51 (2005)
  2. Tifft, W. G., "Periodicity in the redshift intervals for double galaxies", in Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 236, Feb. 15, 1980, p. 70-74.
  3. Tifft, W. G., "Fine Structure Within the Redshift-Magnitude Correlation for Galaxies", The Formation and Dynamics of Galaxies: Proceedings from IAU Symposium no. 58 held in Canberra, Australia, August 12-15, 1973. Edited by John R. Shakeshaft. International Astronomical Union. Symposium no. 58, Dordrecht; Boston: Reidel, p.243
  4. Tifft, W. G., "Redshift Quantization - A Review", Astrophysics and Space Science, v. 227, p. 25-39, 1995
  5. Croasdale, Martin R., "Periodicities in galaxy redshifts", Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 345, Oct. 1, 1989, p. 72-83.
  6. Guthrie, B. N. G.; Napier, W. M., "The Virgo cluster as a test for quantization of extragalactic redshifts", Royal Astronomical Society, Monthly Notices (ISSN 0035-8711), vol. 243, April 1, 1990, p. 431-442.
  7. Guthrie, B. N. G.; Napier, W. M., "Evidence for redshift periodicity in nearby field galaxies", Royal Astronomical Society, Monthly Notices (ISSN 0035-8711), vol. 253, Dec. 1, 1991, p. 533-544.
  8. Holba, A., Horvath, I., Lukacs, B., & Paal, G, "Cosmological parameters and redshift periodicity", Astrophysics and Space Science (ISSN 0004-640X), vol. 198, no. 1, p. 111-120. 1992. See also reference to Broadhurst et al
  9. Sepulveda, E., "Geometric Paradigm Accounts for All Redshift Periodicities" (1987) Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 19, p.689
  10. Tang, Su Min; Zhang, Shuang Nan, "Critical Examinations of QSO Redshift Periodicities and Associations with Galaxies in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data", in The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 633, Issue 1, pp. 41-51 (2005)